Daniel Coro1, Amanda Hutchinson2, Sophie Dahlenburg2, Siobhan Banks2, Alison Coates3. 1. Behaviour-Brain-Body Research Centre, School of Psychology, Social Work and Social Policy, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. daniel.coro@mymail.unisa.edu.au. 2. Behaviour-Brain-Body Research Centre, School of Psychology, Social Work and Social Policy, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 3. Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review identifying how dietary factors are related to cognitive function in cancer survivors who are not currently undergoing primary treatment. METHODS: Using the PRISMA framework, a search was conducted for studies published before February 2019 across multiple databases, identifying 2304 unique articles. Twelve met final inclusion criteria and were evaluated through narrative synthesis. This review was registered with the International Prospective Register Of Systematic Reviews (CRD42018111941). RESULTS: Included studies were heterogeneous in methodology and in dietary and cognitive variables investigated making direct comparisons difficult. Evidence of a relationship between diet and cognition was mixed; the most consistent evidence was identified in relation to a positive relationship between fruit and vegetable intake and cognitive function (both self-reported and objectively tested) in five out of six studies, but was not concordant across all studies. CONCLUSION: Preliminary evidence exists that a greater fruit and vegetable intake is associated with better cognitive functioning in cancer survivors, as has been reported in healthy populations; however, these data are correlational and include relatively small samples. Most evidence related to breast cancer survivors, with individual studies extending to colorectal and stomach cancer survivors. Experimental trials are needed to identify causal attribution of dietary factors on cognitive function in cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: At this time, there is not sufficient evidence to make dietary or nutritional recommendations specifically for improving cognitive function in cancer survivors. This should be considered in light of the general paucity of research on this subject, necessitating further investigations.
PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review identifying how dietary factors are related to cognitive function in cancer survivors who are not currently undergoing primary treatment. METHODS: Using the PRISMA framework, a search was conducted for studies published before February 2019 across multiple databases, identifying 2304 unique articles. Twelve met final inclusion criteria and were evaluated through narrative synthesis. This review was registered with the International Prospective Register Of Systematic Reviews (CRD42018111941). RESULTS: Included studies were heterogeneous in methodology and in dietary and cognitive variables investigated making direct comparisons difficult. Evidence of a relationship between diet and cognition was mixed; the most consistent evidence was identified in relation to a positive relationship between fruit and vegetable intake and cognitive function (both self-reported and objectively tested) in five out of six studies, but was not concordant across all studies. CONCLUSION: Preliminary evidence exists that a greater fruit and vegetable intake is associated with better cognitive functioning in cancer survivors, as has been reported in healthy populations; however, these data are correlational and include relatively small samples. Most evidence related to breast cancer survivors, with individual studies extending to colorectal and stomach cancer survivors. Experimental trials are needed to identify causal attribution of dietary factors on cognitive function in cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: At this time, there is not sufficient evidence to make dietary or nutritional recommendations specifically for improving cognitive function in cancer survivors. This should be considered in light of the general paucity of research on this subject, necessitating further investigations.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer; Cancer survivors; Cognition; Cognitive function; Diet; Nutrition
Authors: S Mayo; H A Messner; S B Rourke; D Howell; J C Victor; J Kuruvilla; J H Lipton; V Gupta; D D Kim; C Piescic; D Breen; A Lambie; D Loach; F V Michelis; N Alam; J Uhm; L McGillis; K Metcalfe Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2016-02-29 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Krystle E Zuniga; Michael J Mackenzie; Sarah A Roberts; Lauren B Raine; Charles H Hillman; Arthur F Kramer; Edward McAuley Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2015-06-30 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Kimberly D Miller; Rebecca L Siegel; Chun Chieh Lin; Angela B Mariotto; Joan L Kramer; Julia H Rowland; Kevin D Stein; Rick Alteri; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Raymond L Rodriguez; John G Albeck; Ameer Y Taha; Kassandra M Ori-McKenney; Gregg H Recanzone; Tyler W Stradleigh; Bronte C Hernandez; Feng-Yao Vincent Tang; En-Pei Isabel Chiang; Lillian Cruz-Orengo Journal: NPJ Sci Food Date: 2017-10-30
Authors: Ana F Oliveira; Sofia Fernandes; Juliana D Reis; Ana Torres; Isabel M Santos; Diane Von Ah Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-07-12 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Amanda M Marín-Chollom; Christiane Hale; Pamela Koch; Ann Ogden Gaffney; Isobel Contento; Hanjie Shen; Dawn L Hershman; Adam M Brickman; Heather Greenlee Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2021-10-28
Authors: Sheri J Hartman; Lauren S Weiner; Loki Natarajan; Dorothy D Sears; Barton W Palmer; Barbara Parker; Tim Ahles; Melinda L Irwin; Kaylene Au Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2021-01-24 Impact factor: 2.226