Literature DB >> 25001008

Intraocular pressure alterations after visual field testing.

Akira Sawada1, Hiroki Yamada, Yoshikazu Yamamoto, Tetsuya Yamamoto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether intraocular pressure (IOP) is significantly altered after visual field (VF) testing in eyes with open-angle glaucoma (OAG).
METHODS: A prospective clinical trial of 106 OAG patients who had not had any previous surgical interventions. IOP was measured with a non-contact tonometer and refractive error with an auto refractometer. The measurements were made before and immediately after the VF test of the first eye (OD) and the second eye (OS).
RESULTS: The baseline refractive error (spherical equivalent) was -4.13 ± 3.61 diopters (D) OD and -4.05 ± 3.63 D OS. The average VF testing time was 7.5 ± 1.4 min OU. The average baseline IOP was 12.8 ± 2.9 mmHg OD and 12.6 ± 2.8 mmHg OS. After the VF testing OD, the average IOP decreased significantly to 12.3 ± 2.6 mmHg (P = 0.001), but the IOP (12.5 ± 2.6 mmHg) OS was not significantly unchanged (P = 0.190). Following the VF testing OS, the IOP OD was 12.2 ± 2.6 mmHg (P = 0.252) and OS was 12.4 ± 2.7 mmHg (P = 0.487). An elevation of ≥2 mmHg in the IOP after the VF testing was found in 2.8 % of the right eyes and 0.9 % of the left eyes. The refractive error was not significantly changed after the VF testing. Multivariate analysis showed statistically significant correlations between the IOP decrease after the VF testing and the baseline IOP (P = 0.000) and the central corneal thickness (P = 0.034).
CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of eyes with OAG, VF testing did not lead to an increase in the IOP. The amount of IOP reduction after VF testing is significantly correlated with the baseline IOP and central corneal thickness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25001008     DOI: 10.1007/s10384-014-0332-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0021-5155            Impact factor:   2.447


  22 in total

1.  Diurnal variation of intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Y Kitazawa; T Horie
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Assessment of the accuracy and reliability of the Topcon CT80 non-contact tonometer.

Authors:  Kelechi C Ogbuehi
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  [Effect of mental and physical stress on intraocular pressure--a pilot study].

Authors:  C Erb; S Brody; H Rau
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 0.700

4.  Effect of accommodation on intraocular pressure in glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  L Cassidy; Y Delaney; P Fitzpatrick; J Blake
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1998 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  [Variations of intraocular pressure induced by psychological stress (author's transl)].

Authors:  F M Grignolo; C Bongioanni; B B Carenini
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 0.700

6.  Long-term intraocular pressure changes after combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and vitrectomy.

Authors:  Yuya Ki-I; Takehiro Yamashita; Akinori Uemura; Taiji Sakamoto
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  The influence of position on intraocular pressure.

Authors:  D R Anderson; W M Grant
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1973-03

8.  Seasonal variation in intraocular pressure.

Authors:  M Blumenthal; R Blumenthal; E Peritz; M Best
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Association of central corneal thickness and 24-hour intraocular pressure fluctuation.

Authors:  Sameh Mosaed; Winston Douglas Chamberlain; John H K Liu; Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Intraocular pressure reduction after phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes: evaluation of a causal relationship between the natural lens and open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Brooks J Poley; Richard L Lindstrom; Thomas W Samuelson; Richard Schulze
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.351

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from Melbourne Rapid Fields Tablet Perimeter Software and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Glaucoma Patients.

Authors:  Harsh Kumar; Mithun Thulasidas
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-22       Impact factor: 1.909

2.  Automatic method of analysis and measurement of additional parameters of corneal deformation in the Corvis tonometer.

Authors:  Robert Koprowski
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.819

3.  Impact of Visual Field Testing on Intraocular Pressure Change Trends in Healthy People and Glaucoma Patients.

Authors:  Mengwei Li; Bingxin Zheng; Qi Wang; Xinghuai Sun
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 1.909

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.