Literature DB >> 25000903

Complete genome sequence of a broad-host-range lytic Dickeya spp. bacteriophage ϕD5.

Robert Czajkowski1, Zofia Ozymko, Szymon Zwirowski, Ewa Lojkowska.   

Abstract

Little is known about lytic bacteriophages infecting plant-pathogenic Dickeya spp. These bacteria cause economically significant losses in arable crops and ornamental plant production worldwide. At present, there is no effective control of diseases caused by Dickeya spp. A novel bacteriophage, ϕD5, belonging to the family Myoviridae, order Caudovirales, that could be used to control these bacteria was isolated previously. This report provides information on its characterization. The ϕD5 genome consists of 155,346-bp-length double-stranded DNA with a GC content of 49.7 % and is predicted to have 196 open reading frames (ORFs) with an average length of 711 nucleotides each. The ORFs were classified into functional groups, including phage structure, packaging, DNA metabolism, regulation, and additional functions. The phage lifestyle predicted from PHACTS indicated that ϕD5 may be a lytic phage and therefore can efficiently kill plant-pathogenic Dickeya spp.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25000903      PMCID: PMC4200354          DOI: 10.1007/s00705-014-2170-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Virol        ISSN: 0304-8608            Impact factor:   2.574


Dickeya spp. (formerly Erwinia chrysanthemi or Pectobacterium chrysanthemum) together with Pectobacterium carotovorum and P. atrosepticum (formerly Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora and Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica, respectively) are plant-pathogenic bacteria that are responsible for economically important losses in potato and other arable and ornamental crops worldwide [8, 10]. They are recognized to be among the top ten most destructive bacterial pathogens in agriculture [6]. In the past, Dickeya spp. were associated mainly with crop diseases in tropical and subtropical regions and were rarely isolated from diseased plants cultivated in Western and Northern Europe [5]. However, recently, there has been an increase in potato crop infection in Europe attributed to Dickeya spp., and especially to the presence and spread of a new virulent species named D. solani [11]. D. solani has been reported in several countries in Western Europe, including France, the Netherlands, Belgium, Poland, Germany, Spain, Sweden, Finland, and the United Kingdom, as well as in Israel and Georgia [11]. At present, there is no effective control of Dickeya spp. diseases, whether based on physical, chemical or biological measures under field conditions [3]. There are also no immune crop cultivars readily available on the market. Current control relies solely on measures in crop production that avoid or reduce the risks of contamination of the propagative material – measures that are far from being reliable [3]. Bacteriophages are a promising and environmentally friendly substitute to supplement present control strategies to protect growing plants as well as harvested crops against plant-pathogenic bacteria [7]. Their potential as biological control agents has been evaluated in different studies involving various plant pathogens [6]. Recently, Adriaenssens and co-workers presented a genetic and proteomic study on the first D. solani phage, named LIMEstone [1] and we presented data on isolation and characterization of several lytic bacteriophages against different Dickeya species [4]. Despite the growing interest in using bacteriophages to control Dickeya species, in general, there is still very little information on their genome organization and structure. Data on phage genomics may facilitate development of biological control procedures. For example, the understanding of the genetic background of the phage lifestyle can help in designing better biological control applications, and new delivery strategies may support longer stability of phages in the environment. So far, there is only one Dickeya spp. phage genome available in the GenBank database (NC019925), and this phage has a very restricted host range, able to infect D. solani only [1]. In contrast, bacteriophage ϕD5, despite its morphological similarity (both phages belong to the family Myoviridae), has a broad host range, larger genome, and higher GC content in comparison with LIMEstone phage [4]. Due to its broad host range, phage ϕD5 appears to be a very good candidate as biological control agent. The ϕD5 phage was isolated in our previous study from arable soil in the Pomorskie region in Poland, primarily using D. solani (strain IPO2222) as a host [4]. It has been characterized in full for its morphologic and phenotypic features. Host-range experiments have showed that it can infect/lyse not only D. solani but also other Dickeya spp., including D. dianthicola, D. zeae, D. dadantii and D. chrysanthemi [4]. Transmission electron microscopy as described by Czajkowski et al. [4] revealed that phage ϕD5 belongs to the family Myoviridae and the order Caudovirales, with a contractive tail (ca. 140 nm in length) and an icosahedral head (ca. 100 nm in diameter). To obtain a high phage titer (ca. 1013–1014 plaque-forming units [pfu] ml−1) for genomic DNA purification, phage ϕD5 was enriched in D. solani IPO2222 [9] cultures as described previously [2]. After enrichment, bacterial cells were removed by centrifugation (8000×g, 20 min), and the resulting phage suspension (ca. 50 ml) was filtered using a 0.22-µm membrane filter to remove bacterial debris. The phage suspension was treated with DNase I (Sigma-Aldrich; final concentration, 0.5 mg ml−1) for 60 min at 37 °C with shaking (100 rpm) to digest the bacterial DNA. Phage particles were further purified and concentrated via ultracentrifugation (35,000×g, 4 °C) in a CsCl (Sigma) gradient with densities of 1.4 to 1.7 g ml−1 for 3 h following by a second round of equilibrium gradient ultracentrifugation (35,000×g, 4 °C) in 1.4 g ml−1 CsCl for 18 h. The resulting high-titer phage suspension (ca. 1.5–2 ml) was dialyzed to remove CsCl at 4 °C in CsCl solutions in water in descending CsCl concentrations (60 % to 10 % CsCl) for 2 h. The ϕD5 phage genomic DNA was isolated as described previously [2]. Phage ϕD5 genomic DNA was sequenced using the Illumina technology and re-assembled de novo at Baseclear, The Netherlands (www.baseclear.com). Structural and functional annotation was obtained from the IGS Annotation Service (Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine automated pipeline http://ae.igs.umaryland.edu/cgi/index.cgi) and from RAST (Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology, accessed via the internet http://rast.nmpdr.org/). The ϕD5 genome was mapped and annotated using available phage genome sequences deposited in GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/). The lifestyle of phage ϕD5 (lytic or temperate) was predicted using the PHACTS program (http://www.phantome.org/PHACTS/online.htm). The genome sequence of phage ϕD5 contains 155,346 bp, 196 predicted open reading frames (ORFs; predicted protein-encoding genes [PEGs]) and an average GC content of 49.7 %. The average gene length was predicted to be 711 nucleotides, and 89.9 % of the genome consists of coding regions. Of the 196 putative PEGs, 50 PEGs (25.5 %) have an assigned function, 42 (21.4 %) were unclassified with no assigned category, and eight (4.1 %) PEGs have unknown function. The rest were classified as (conserved) hypothetical proteins. Functional grouping of predicted ORFs (and PEGs) revealed that two ORFs are associated with nucleotide metabolism, one with energy metabolism, seven with transport and binding proteins, nine with DNA metabolism, three with transcription, one with regulatory functions, four with the cell envelope, six with cellular processes, and four with mobile and extrachromosomal elements (Supplementary Tab. 1). The ϕD5 genome encodes only one tRNA, and for the majority of genes (94.4 %), the start codon for transcription is ATG, whereas GTG and TTG are start codons in only 4.1 % and 1.5 % phage genes, respectively. The functions of the majority of phage ϕD5 genes could not be identified, probably due to the lack of annotation data on phages present in the majority of international genome sequence databases (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

The genome of the bacteriophage ϕD5 (155,346 bp). Structural and functional annotation was obtained from the IGS Annotation Service (Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine automated pipeline http://ae.igs.umaryland.edu/cgi/index.cgi) and from RAST (Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology, accessed via the internet http://rast.nmpdr.org/). ORFs coding for proteins involved in DNA/RNA transcription, translation and metabolism are marked in green, ORFs coding for proteins involved in bacteriophage particle assembly are marked in yellow, and ORFs coding for enzymes involved in metabolism are marked in red. The tRNA is marked with a blue square. Arrows indicate the direction of transcription and translation. The ORFs coding for hypothetical and conserved hypothetical proteins are not shown on the map. The figure was generated using the genome visualization program SnapGene ver. 2.3.4 (http://www.snapgene.com/)

The genome of the bacteriophage ϕD5 (155,346 bp). Structural and functional annotation was obtained from the IGS Annotation Service (Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine automated pipeline http://ae.igs.umaryland.edu/cgi/index.cgi) and from RAST (Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology, accessed via the internet http://rast.nmpdr.org/). ORFs coding for proteins involved in DNA/RNA transcription, translation and metabolism are marked in green, ORFs coding for proteins involved in bacteriophage particle assembly are marked in yellow, and ORFs coding for enzymes involved in metabolism are marked in red. The tRNA is marked with a blue square. Arrows indicate the direction of transcription and translation. The ORFs coding for hypothetical and conserved hypothetical proteins are not shown on the map. The figure was generated using the genome visualization program SnapGene ver. 2.3.4 (http://www.snapgene.com/) To our knowledge, this is the first report of a broad-host-range Dickeya spp.-infecting bacteriophage and its complete genome sequence, and it is the first genome sequence of a Dickeya spp. bacteriophage isolated in Poland. This sequence will provide useful fundamental information for advanced molecular research on the infection/interaction of phage ϕD5 and its Dickeya spp. host. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 25 kb)
  3 in total

Review 1.  Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology.

Authors:  John Mansfield; Stephane Genin; Shimpei Magori; Vitaly Citovsky; Malinee Sriariyanum; Pamela Ronald; Max Dow; Valérie Verdier; Steven V Beer; Marcos A Machado; Ian Toth; George Salmond; Gary D Foster
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 5.663

2.  Dickeya solani sp. nov., a pectinolytic plant-pathogenic bacterium isolated from potato (Solanum tuberosum).

Authors:  Jan M van der Wolf; Els H Nijhuis; Malgorzata J Kowalewska; Gerry S Saddler; Neil Parkinson; John G Elphinstone; Leighton Pritchard; Ian K Toth; Ewa Lojkowska; Marta Potrykus; Malgorzata Waleron; Paul de Vos; Ilse Cleenwerck; Minna Pirhonen; Linda Garlant; Valérie Hélias; Joël F Pothier; Valentin Pflüger; Brion Duffy; Leah Tsror; Shula Manulis
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  T4-related bacteriophage LIMEstone isolates for the control of soft rot on potato caused by 'Dickeya solani'.

Authors:  Evelien M Adriaenssens; Johan Van Vaerenbergh; Dieter Vandenheuvel; Vincent Dunon; Pieter-Jan Ceyssens; Maurice De Proft; Andrew M Kropinski; Jean-Paul Noben; Martine Maes; Rob Lavigne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total
  11 in total

1.  Bi- and Multi-directional Gene Transfer in the Natural Populations of Polyvalent Bacteriophages, and Their Host Species Spectrum Representing Foodborne Versus Other Human and/or Animal Pathogens.

Authors:  Ekaterine Gabashvili; Saba Kobakhidze; Stylianos Koulouris; Tobin Robinson; Mamuka Kotetishvili
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Diversity of limestone bacteriophages infecting Dickeya solani isolated in the Czech Republic.

Authors:  Karel Petrzik; Josef Vacek; Sára Brázdová; Rudolf Ševčík; Igor Koloniuk
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.574

3.  Genomic, proteomic and morphological characterization of two novel broad host lytic bacteriophages ΦPD10.3 and ΦPD23.1 infecting pectinolytic Pectobacterium spp. and Dickeya spp.

Authors:  Robert Czajkowski; Zofia Ozymko; Victor de Jager; Joanna Siwinska; Anna Smolarska; Adam Ossowicki; Magdalena Narajczyk; Ewa Lojkowska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Application of zinc chloride precipitation method for rapid isolation and concentration of infectious Pectobacterium spp. and Dickeya spp. lytic bacteriophages from surface water and plant and soil extracts.

Authors:  Robert Czajkowski; Zofia Ozymko; Ewa Lojkowska
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.099

5.  The viability of lytic bacteriophage ΦD5 in potato-associated environments and its effect on Dickeya solani in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plants.

Authors:  Robert Czajkowski; Anna Smolarska; Zofia Ozymko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Environmental Bacteriophages of the Emerging Enterobacterial Phytopathogen, Dickeya solani, Show Genomic Conservation and Capacity for Horizontal Gene Transfer between Their Bacterial Hosts.

Authors:  Andrew Day; Jiyoon Ahn; Xinzhe Fang; George P C Salmond
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  The complete genome, structural proteome, comparative genomics and phylogenetic analysis of a broad host lytic bacteriophage ϕD3 infecting pectinolytic Dickeya spp.

Authors:  Robert Czajkowski; Zofia Ozymko; Joanna Siwinska; Adam Ossowicki; Victor de Jager; Magdalena Narajczyk; Ewa Łojkowska
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2015-09-24

8.  Bacteriophages isolated from Lake Michigan demonstrate broad host-range across several bacterial phyla.

Authors:  Kema Malki; Alex Kula; Katherine Bruder; Emily Sible; Thomas Hatzopoulos; Stephanie Steidel; Siobhan C Watkins; Catherine Putonti
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.099

9.  Jumbo Bacteriophages Are Represented Within an Increasing Diversity of Environmental Viruses Infecting the Emerging Phytopathogen, Dickeya solani.

Authors:  Andrew Day; Jiyoon Ahn; George P C Salmond
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Host Specificity of the Dickeya Bacteriophage PP35 Is Directed by a Tail Spike Interaction With Bacterial O-Antigen, Enabling the Infection of Alternative Non-pathogenic Bacterial Host.

Authors:  Anastasia P Kabanova; Mikhail M Shneider; Aleksei A Korzhenkov; Eugenia N Bugaeva; Kirill K Miroshnikov; Evelina L Zdorovenko; Eugene E Kulikov; Stepan V Toschakov; Alexander N Ignatov; Yuriy A Knirel; Konstantin A Miroshnikov
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.