| Literature DB >> 24999629 |
Kristian Alfsnes1, Xavier Raynaud2, Tone Tønjum1, Ole Herman Ambur3.
Abstract
Evolvability by means of simple sequence repeat (SSR) instability is a feature under the constant influence of opposing selective pressures to expand and compress the repeat tract and is mechanistically influenced by factors that affect genetic instability. In addition to direct selection for protein expression and structural integrity, other factors that influence tract length evolution were studied. The genetic instability of SSRs that switch the expression of antibiotic resistance ON and OFF was modelled mathematically and monitored in a panel of live meningococcal strains. The mathematical model showed that the SSR length of a theoretical locus in an evolving population may be shaped by direct selection of expression status (ON or OFF), tract length dependent (α) and tract length independent factors (β). According to the model an increase in α drives the evolution towards shorter tracts. An increase in β drives the evolution towards a normal distribution of tract lengths given that an upper and a lower limit are set. Insertion and deletion biases were shown to skew allelic distributions in both directions. The meningococcal SSR model was tested in vivo by monitoring the frequency of spectinomycin resistance OFF→ON switching in a designed locus. The instability of a comprehensive panel of the homopolymeric SSRs, constituted of a range of 5-13 guanine nucleotides, was monitored in wildtype and mismatch repair deficient backgrounds. Both the repeat length itself and mismatch repair deficiency were shown to influence the genetic instability of the homopolymeric tracts. A possible insertion bias was observed in tracts ≤G10. Finally, an inverse correlation between the number of tract-encoded amino acids and growth in the presence of ON-selection illustrated a limitation to SSR expansion in an essential gene associated with the designed model locus and the protein function mediating antibiotic resistance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24999629 PMCID: PMC4085013 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101637
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Plasmids, primers and strains.
| Plasmids: | Description | Reference |
| pARR2107 |
|
|
| pBluescript SKII+ (pBSKII+) | Cloning vector, AmpR | Stratagene |
| pUP6 | Cloning vector pHSS6 modified with DUS and reverse DUS, KanR |
|
| pUD8 | pARR2107 with inserted 12-mer DUS downstream of | This study |
| pUD5 | Same as above, but with G5 tract | This study |
| pUD7 | Same as above, but with G7 tract | This study |
| pUD10 | Same as above, but with G10 tract | This study |
| pUD11 | Same as above, but with G11 tract | This study |
| pUD13 | Same as above, but with G13 tract | This study |
| pO9 | pARR2107 with inserted 12-mer DUS downstream of | This study |
| pO12 | Same as above, but with 12 nt non-repeat tract in ON-state | This study |
| pOHA | pBSK II+ harboring | This study |
|
|
|
|
|
| Serogroup A, isolated in the Philippines in 1968 | Dominique A. Caugant |
|
| Electrocompetent cells prepared following standard protocol | New England Biolabs |
|
|
|
|
| 7160SAF-Tn5- | Construction of pOHA |
|
| 7161SAF-Tn5- | Construction of pOHA |
|
| 7162OHA101 | Construction of pOHA |
|
| 7163OHA106 | Construction of pOHA |
|
| 7164 OHA105 | Construction of pOHA |
|
| 7165OHA104 | Construction of pOHA |
|
| KA24 | pUD7 |
|
| KA25 | pUD7 |
|
| KA26 | Sequencing primer |
|
| KA27 | Sequencing primer |
|
| KA28 | pUD5 |
|
| KA29 | pUD5 |
|
| KA30 | pUD10 |
|
| KA31 | pUD10 |
|
| KA32 | pUD11 |
|
| KA33 | pUD11 |
|
| KA91 | pUD13 |
|
| KA92 | pUD13 |
|
| KA111 | pO9 |
|
| KA112 | pO9 |
|
| JEE7 | pO12 |
|
| JEE8 | pO12 |
|
1. Alexander HL, Richardson AR, Stojiljkovic I (2004) Natural transformation and phase variation modulation in Neisseria meningitidis. Mol Microbiol 52: 771–783.
2. Wolfgang M, Van Putten JPM, Hayes SF, Koomey M (1999) The comP locus of Neisseria gonorrhoeae encodes a type IV prepilin that is dispensable for pilus biogenesis but essential for natural transformation. Mol Microbiol 31: 1345–1357.
Sequence of the polyG tract constructs.
| Constructs | PolyG tract region | Required OFF→ON mutation | # of AA as ON |
|
|
| +1 nt (to G6) | 2×Gly |
|
|
| −1 nt (to G6) | 2×Gly |
|
|
| +1 nt (to G9) | 3×Gly |
|
|
| −1 nt (to G9) | 3×Gly |
|
|
| +1 nt (to G12) | 4×Gly |
|
|
| −1 nt (to G12) | 4×Gly |
|
|
| In-frame | 3×Gly |
|
|
| In-frame | 4×Gly |
*This lists the number of amino acids (AA) only in the tract as seen bold in the table, Gly = Glycine.
OFF→ON Switching frequencies.
| Initial tract length | Median (range) (wt) | Step-wise comparison (wt) | Median (range) (MMR) | Step-wise comparison (MMR) | Comparison wt & MMR deficient | Comparison repeat & non-repeat tract |
|
| 7.7×10−12 (5.1×10−12–2.7×10−11) | 1.7×10−09 (6.8×10−12–2.1×10−05) | −52.9, | N/A | ||
| −43.3, | −67.2, | |||||
|
| 6.5×10−10 (1.4×10−11–1.5×10−07) | 1.9×10−07 (1.6×10−10–2.1×10−05) | −76.7, | N/A | ||
| −50.5, | −44.1, | |||||
|
| 2.4×10−08 (1.3×10−09–2.1×10−06) | 9.3×10−06 (1.7×10−08–1.0×10−03) | −70.3, | −147.2, | ||
| −20.2, | 38.4, | |||||
|
| 1.2×10−07 (3.0×10−10–1.1×10−05) | 5.2×10−07 (3.2×10−10–1.4×10−05) | −11.7, | −96.7, | ||
| 57.7, | 77.1, | |||||
|
| 1.2×10−09 (1.2×10−11–5.3×10−07) | 1.2×10−09 (4.6×10−11–1.1×10−07) | 7.7, | −111.9, | ||
| −0.5, | −26.0, | |||||
|
| 4.5×10−09 (1.4×10−11–2.8×10−07) | 1.1×10−08 (1.0×10−10–4.0×10−07) | −17.9, | −111.5, | ||
| - | ||||||
|
| 0.6 (0.5–1.1) | N/A | N/A | - | ||
| 22.3, | N/A | |||||
|
| 2.2×10−04 (2.4×10−07–5.6×10−04) | N/A | N/A | - |
*Initial tract length and closest ON configuration in (), see Table 2.
**Kruskal-Wallis with post Dunn's multiple comparison tests, difference in rank sum.
Median survival frequencies are shown for the two non-repeat controls (O9 and O12).
No significant difference denoted by “ns”.
Non appropriate comparison denoted by “-”.
Not available denoted by “N/A”.
Figure 1Mathematical model illustrating random walk.
Allelic steady-state distribution is shown of a modelled bacterial population without selection and no contribution of the cis acting factor α. The figure illustrate the isolated effect of the trans acting factor β on the distribution of the tract lengths, an effect caused by increased random walk within a defined range of tract lengths. Where K = 100, μ = 5, and d = 5.
Figure 2Mathematical modelling of the evolution of homopolymeric tract length.
Allelic steady-state distributions are shown following different values of tract length dependent instability (α) and tract length independent instability (β) (panel A–D). The influence of selection was taken into account by implementing penalizing selection on tracts that were not multiples of 3, corresponding to the out-of-frame tract length selection seen in the PV assay. Where K = 100, μ = 5, d = 1 and d = 5.
Figure 3Distribution of homopolymeric tract lengths in Mc strains.
A comparison of the homopolymeric tract lengths of putative PV genes identified in three different Mc strains (see references in Table S1).
Figure 4Switching frequencies of a range of polyG tracts in vivo in Mc wt and MMR deficient backgrounds.
Switching frequencies (left y-axis) are shown for each tract length G5 to G13 in wt (black pyramids), the MMR deficient background (grey squares), and the survival frequencies (right y-axis) for the non-repeat controls (black circles). Median value indicated for each tract length for wt (red) and MMR deficient (blue) background. Dotted line indicates the spontaneous mutation frequency for Spc resistance (1.0×10−12).
Figure 5An inverse relationship between Mc colony size and homopolymeric tract length.
Colony sizes (area) of CFUs following the PV assay are shown for the in-frame tract length of the PV constructs (black diamonds), and the non-repeat controls (black circles). Mean value for each in-frame tract length indicated (red).
Colony size (mm2).
| In-frame tract length | Mean (95% CI) | Step-wise comparison | Comparison repeat & non-repeat tract |
|
| 10.9 (9.9–12.0) | N/A | |
|
| |||
|
| 4.4 (4.0–4.7) |
| |
|
| |||
|
| 0.6 (0.5–0.6) |
| |
|
| 3.7 (3.4–4.1) | - | |
|
| |||
|
| 0.3 (0.2–0.3) | - |
*In-frame ON tract length, see Table 2.
**Unpaired Student's t-test, two-tailed p-value.
Non appropriate comparison denoted by “-”.
Not available denoted by “N/A”.