Literature DB >> 24998180

Permeability of subcutaneous tissues surrounding long-term implants to oxygen.

Lucas S Kumosa1, Timothy L Routh2, Joe T Lin2, Joseph Y Lucisano2, David A Gough3.   

Abstract

Certain types of implanted medical devices depend on oxygen supplied from surrounding tissues for their function. However, there is a concern that the tissue associated with the foreign body response to implants may become impermeable to oxygen over the long term and render the implant nonfunctional. We report oxygen flux recordings from electrochemical oxygen sensor devices with wireless telemetry implanted in subcutaneous porcine tissues. The devices remained implanted for up to 13 weeks and were removed with adjacent tissues at specified times for histologic examination. There are four main observations: (1) In the first few weeks after implantation, the oxygen flux to the sensors, or current density, declined to a sustained mean value, having unsynchronized cyclic variations around the mean; (2) The oxygen mass transfer resistance of the sensor membrane was negligible compared to that of the tissue, allowing for a sensitive estimate of the tissue permeability; (3) The effective diffusion coefficient of oxygen in tissues was found to be approximately one order of magnitude lower than in water; and (4) Quantitative histologic analysis of the tissues showed a mild foreign body response to the PDMS sensor membrane material, with capillaries positioned close to the implant surface. Continuous recordings of oxygen flux indicate that the tissue permeability changes predictably with time, and suggest that oxygen delivery can be sustained over the long term.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foreign body response; Long-term implants; Oxygen mass transfer; Tissue permeability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24998180      PMCID: PMC4527688          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  18 in total

1.  Mass transfer and gas-phase calibration of implanted oxygen sensors.

Authors:  Milan T Makale; Michael C Jablecki; David A Gough
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Phenotypic and functional characterization of porcine granulocyte developmental stages using two new markers.

Authors:  C Pérez; C Revilla; B Alvarez; S Chamorro; C Correa; N Domenech; F Alonso; A Ezquerra; J Domínguez
Journal:  Dev Comp Immunol       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  Oxygen and inulin transport measurements in a planar tissue-engineered bioartificial organ.

Authors:  Zhan Ding; Ronald L Fournier
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2002-02

4.  Anti-Leu-3/T4 antibodies react with cells of monocyte/macrophage and Langerhans lineage.

Authors:  G S Wood; N L Warner; R A Warnke
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  Diffusion coefficient of oxygen through tissues.

Authors:  J D MacDougall; M McCabe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-09-09       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Function of an implanted tissue glucose sensor for more than 1 year in animals.

Authors:  David A Gough; Lucas S Kumosa; Timothy L Routh; Joe T Lin; Joseph Y Lucisano
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 7.  Oxygen gradients in the microcirculation.

Authors:  Amy G Tsai; Paul C Johnson; Marcos Intaglietta
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 37.312

8.  Diffusion and convection in collagen gels: implications for transport in the tumor interstitium.

Authors:  Saroja Ramanujan; Alain Pluen; Trevor D McKee; Edward B Brown; Yves Boucher; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Effect of hypoxia on insulin secretion by isolated rat and canine islets of Langerhans.

Authors:  K E Dionne; C K Colton; M L Yarmush
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 9.461

10.  Energy extraction from the biologic battery in the inner ear.

Authors:  Patrick P Mercier; Andrew C Lysaght; Saurav Bandyopadhyay; Anantha P Chandrakasan; Konstantina M Stankovic
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  In Vivo Chemical Sensors: Role of Biocompatibility on Performance and Utility.

Authors:  Robert J Soto; Jackson R Hall; Micah D Brown; James B Taylor; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Body mass scaling of passive oxygen diffusion in endotherms and ectotherms.

Authors:  James F Gillooly; Juan Pablo Gomez; Evgeny V Mavrodiev; Yue Rong; Eric S McLamore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Glucose Monitoring in Individuals With Diabetes Using a Long-Term Implanted Sensor/Telemetry System and Model.

Authors:  Joseph Y Lucisano; Timothy L Routh; Joe T Lin; David A Gough
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Modeling the Physiological Factors Affecting Glucose Sensor Function in Vivo.

Authors:  Matthew T Novak; William M Reichert
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-30

5.  Macrophage embedded fibrin gels: an in vitro platform for assessing inflammation effects on implantable glucose sensors.

Authors:  Matthew T Novak; Fan Yuan; William M Reichert
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Review of the Long-Term Implantable Senseonics Continuous Glucose Monitoring System and Other Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Joseph
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-04-29

7.  Composite Hydrogels with Engineered Microdomains for Optical Glucose Sensing at Low Oxygen Conditions.

Authors:  Lindsey R Bornhoeft; Aniket Biswas; Michael J McShane
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-22

Review 8.  Monitoring with In Vivo Electrochemical Sensors: Navigating the Complexities of Blood and Tissue Reactivity.

Authors:  Pankaj Vadgama
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Monte Carlo method for assessment of a multimodal insertable biosensor.

Authors:  Jesse Fine; Michael J McShane; Gerard L Coté
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 3.758

10.  Development of a Bioartificial Vascular Pancreas.

Authors:  Edward X Han; Juan Wang; Mehmet Kural; Bo Jiang; Katherine L Leiby; Nazar Chowdhury; George Tellides; Richard G Kibbey; Jeffrey H Lawson; Laura E Niklason
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 7.813

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.