Literature DB >> 24997319

Evaluation of the Ion Torrent™ HID SNP 169-plex: A SNP typing assay developed for human identification by second generation sequencing.

Claus Børsting1, Sarah L Fordyce2, Jill Olofsson1, Helle Smidt Mogensen1, Niels Morling1.   

Abstract

The Ion Torrent™ HID SNP assay amplified 136 autosomal SNPs and 33 Y-chromosome markers in one PCR and the markers were subsequently typed using the Ion PGM™ second generation sequencing platform. A total of 51 of the autosomal SNPs were selected from the SNPforID panel that is routinely used in our ISO 17025 accredited laboratory. Concordance between the Ion Torrent™ HID SNP assay and the SNPforID assay was tested by typing 44 Iraqis twice with the Ion Torrent™ HID SNP assay. The same samples were previously typed with the SNPforID assay and the Y-chromosome haplogroups of the individuals were previously identified by typing 45 Y-chromosome SNPs. Full concordance between the assays were obtained except for the SNP genotypes of two SNPs. These SNPs were among the eight SNPs (rs2399332, rs1029047, rs10776839, rs4530059, rs8037429, rs430046, rs1031825 and rs1523537) with inconsistent allele balance among samples. These SNPs should be excluded from the panel. The optimal amount of DNA in the PCR seemed to be ≥0.5ng. Allele drop-outs were rare and only seen in experiments with <0.5ng input DNA and with a coverage of <50reads. No allele drop-in was observed. The great majority of the heterozygote allele balances were between 0.6 and 1.6, which is comparable to the heterozygote balances of STRs typed with PCR-CE. The number of reads with base calls that differed from the genotype call was typically less than five. This allowed detection of 1:100 mixtures with a high degree of certainty in experiments with a high total depth of coverage. In conclusion, the Ion PGM™ is a very promising platform for forensic genetics. However, the secondary sequence analysis software made wrong genotype calls from correctly sequenced alleles. These types of errors must be corrected before the platform can be used in case work. Furthermore, the sequence analysis software should be further developed and include quality settings for each SNP based on validation studies.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Forensic genetics; Human identification; Ion PGM™; SNP typing; SNPforID; Second generation sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24997319     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  20 in total

1.  The QIAGEN 140-locus single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel for forensic identification using massively parallel sequencing (MPS): an evaluation and a direct-to-PCR trial.

Authors:  I Avent; A G Kinnane; N Jones; I Petermann; R Daniel; M E Gahan; D McNevin
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Comparison between magnetic bead and qPCR library normalisation methods for forensic MPS genotyping.

Authors:  Bhavik Mehta; Samantha Venables; Paul Roffey
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 3.  Separation/extraction, detection, and interpretation of DNA mixtures in forensic science (review).

Authors:  Ruiyang Tao; Shouyu Wang; Jiashuo Zhang; Jingyi Zhang; Zihao Yang; Xiang Sheng; Yiping Hou; Suhua Zhang; Chengtao Li
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Case report: on the use of the HID-Ion AmpliSeq™ Ancestry Panel in a real forensic case.

Authors:  C Hollard; C Keyser; T Delabarde; A Gonzalez; C Vilela Lamego; V Zvénigorosky; B Ludes
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Effects of the Ion PGM™ Hi-Q™ sequencing chemistry on sequence data quality.

Authors:  Jennifer D Churchill; Jonathan L King; Ranajit Chakraborty; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  A SNP panel for identity and kinship testing using massive parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Ida Grandell; Raed Samara; Andreas O Tillmar
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  A novel forensic panel of 186-plex SNPs and 123-plex STR loci based on massively parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Xinyao Miao; Yuesheng Shen; Xiaojuan Gong; Huiyun Yu; Bowen Li; Liao Chang; Yinan Wang; Jingna Fan; Zuhuan Liang; Bowen Tan; Shengbin Li; Bao Zhang
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  Ancestry inference and admixture component estimations of Chinese Kazak group based on 165 AIM-SNPs via NGS platform.

Authors:  Tong Xie; Chunmei Shen; Chao Liu; Yating Fang; Yuxin Guo; Qiong Lan; Lingxiang Wang; Jianye Ge; Yongsong Zhou; Shaoqing Wen; Qing Yang; Bofeng Zhu
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  A new strategy to confirm the identity of tumour tissues using single-nucleotide polymorphisms and next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Lijuan Sun; Qi Liu; Shujin Li; Guanju Ma; Zhandong Wang; Chunling Ma; Bin Cong; Lihong Fu
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 2.686

10.  Blind study evaluation illustrates utility of the Ion PGM™ system for use in human identity DNA typing.

Authors:  Jennifer D Churchill; Joseph Chang; Jianye Ge; Narasimhan Rajagopalan; Sharon C Wootton; Chien-Wei Chang; Robert Lagacé; Wenchi Liao; Jonathan L King; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.351

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.