Alvaro Alonso1, Lindsay G S Bengtson2, Richard F MacLehose2, Pamela L Lutsey2, Lin Y Chen2, Kamakshi Lakshminarayan2. 1. From the Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health (A.A., L.G.S.B., R.F.M., P.L.L., K.L.), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; and Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine (L.Y.C.) and Department of Neurology (K.L.), University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis. alonso@umn.edu. 2. From the Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health (A.A., L.G.S.B., R.F.M., P.L.L., K.L.), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; and Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine (L.Y.C.) and Department of Neurology (K.L.), University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In randomized trials, patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving dabigatran, a direct oral anticoagulant, had lower risk of intracranial bleeding (ICB) than those on warfarin. However, concerns exist about potential worse outcomes in dabigatran users if bleeding occurs, given the lack of approved reversal agents. Thus, we examined in-hospital mortality in AF patients with ICB being treated with dabigatran versus warfarin in a real-world population in the United States. METHODS: We analyzed healthcare utilization claims in the Truven Health Marketscan Research Databases. The study sample included patients with AF admitted to a hospital with a primary diagnosis of ICB. Information on medications, inpatient, and outpatient diagnoses was obtained from available claims. Propensity score-adjusted risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals of in-hospital mortality comparing current users of dabigatran versus warfarin were estimated using relative risk regression. RESULTS: Among 2391 AF patients admitted with ICB (2290 on warfarin, 101 on dabigatran), 531 died during their admission. In-hospital mortality was similar in those treated with warfarin (22%) or dabigatran (20%). Compared with warfarin users, the propensity score-adjusted risk ratio (95% confidence interval) of mortality in dabigatran users was 0.93 (0.62-1.37). Associations were similar across different ICB subtypes (intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and subdural hematoma). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of AF patients with ICB on oral anticoagulants, dabigatran was not associated with higher in-hospital mortality compared with warfarin. Hence, reluctance to use dabigatran because of a lack of approved reversal agents is not supported by our results.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In randomized trials, patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving dabigatran, a direct oral anticoagulant, had lower risk of intracranial bleeding (ICB) than those on warfarin. However, concerns exist about potential worse outcomes in dabigatran users if bleeding occurs, given the lack of approved reversal agents. Thus, we examined in-hospital mortality in AFpatients with ICB being treated with dabigatran versus warfarin in a real-world population in the United States. METHODS: We analyzed healthcare utilization claims in the Truven Health Marketscan Research Databases. The study sample included patients with AF admitted to a hospital with a primary diagnosis of ICB. Information on medications, inpatient, and outpatient diagnoses was obtained from available claims. Propensity score-adjusted risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals of in-hospital mortality comparing current users of dabigatran versus warfarin were estimated using relative risk regression. RESULTS: Among 2391 AFpatients admitted with ICB (2290 on warfarin, 101 on dabigatran), 531 died during their admission. In-hospital mortality was similar in those treated with warfarin (22%) or dabigatran (20%). Compared with warfarin users, the propensity score-adjusted risk ratio (95% confidence interval) of mortality in dabigatran users was 0.93 (0.62-1.37). Associations were similar across different ICB subtypes (intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and subdural hematoma). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of AFpatients with ICB on oral anticoagulants, dabigatran was not associated with higher in-hospital mortality compared with warfarin. Hence, reluctance to use dabigatran because of a lack of approved reversal agents is not supported by our results.
Authors: Manesh R Patel; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Jyotsna Garg; Guohua Pan; Daniel E Singer; Werner Hacke; Günter Breithardt; Jonathan L Halperin; Graeme J Hankey; Jonathan P Piccini; Richard C Becker; Christopher C Nessel; John F Paolini; Scott D Berkowitz; Keith A A Fox; Robert M Califf Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Susan E Andrade; Leslie R Harrold; Jennifer Tjia; Sarah L Cutrona; Jane S Saczynski; Katherine S Dodd; Robert J Goldberg; Jerry H Gurwitz Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Craig T January; L Samuel Wann; Joseph S Alpert; Hugh Calkins; Joaquin E Cigarroa; Joseph C Cleveland; Jamie B Conti; Patrick T Ellinor; Michael D Ezekowitz; Michael E Field; Katherine T Murray; Ralph L Sacco; William G Stevenson; Patrick J Tchou; Cynthia M Tracy; Clyde W Yancy Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Arne Lauer; Flor A Cianchetti; Elizabeth M Van Cott; Frieder Schlunk; Elena Schulz; Waltraud Pfeilschifter; Helmuth Steinmetz; Chris B Schaffer; Eng H Lo; Christian Foerch Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-09-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jared W Magnani; Michiel Rienstra; Honghuang Lin; Moritz F Sinner; Steven A Lubitz; David D McManus; Josée Dupuis; Patrick T Ellinor; Emelia J Benjamin Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-11-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Christopher B Granger; John H Alexander; John J V McMurray; Renato D Lopes; Elaine M Hylek; Michael Hanna; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Jack Ansell; Dan Atar; Alvaro Avezum; M Cecilia Bahit; Rafael Diaz; J Donald Easton; Justin A Ezekowitz; Greg Flaker; David Garcia; Margarida Geraldes; Bernard J Gersh; Sergey Golitsyn; Shinya Goto; Antonio G Hermosillo; Stefan H Hohnloser; John Horowitz; Puneet Mohan; Petr Jansky; Basil S Lewis; Jose Luis Lopez-Sendon; Prem Pais; Alexander Parkhomenko; Freek W A Verheugt; Jun Zhu; Lars Wallentin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-08-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jonathan P Piccini; Bradley G Hammill; Moritz F Sinner; Paul N Jensen; Adrian F Hernandez; Susan R Heckbert; Emelia J Benjamin; Lesley H Curtis Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2012-01-10
Authors: Andrew Cunningham; C Michael Stein; Cecilia P Chung; James R Daugherty; Walter E Smalley; Wayne A Ray Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2011-03-08 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali Journal: Med Care Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Jean-Eric Tarride; Lisa Dolovich; Gordon Blackhouse; Jason Robert Guertin; Natasha Burke; Veena Manja; Alex Grinvalds; Ting Lim; Jeff S Healey; Roopinder K Sandhu Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2017-08-22
Authors: Josefine Grundtvig; Christian Ovesen; Inger Havsteen; Thomas Christensen; David Gaist; Helle K Iversen; Christina Kruuse; Alexander Lilja-Cyron; Karen Ægidius; Sverre Rosenbaum; Per Meden; Jacob Marstrand; Louisa Christensen; Thorsten Steiner; Hanne Christensen Journal: Eur Stroke J Date: 2021-04-07
Authors: Taku Inohara; Ying Xian; Li Liang; Roland A Matsouaka; Jeffrey L Saver; Eric E Smith; Lee H Schwamm; Mathew J Reeves; Adrian F Hernandez; Deepak L Bhatt; Eric D Peterson; Gregg C Fonarow Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Walter Bialkowski; Sylvia Tan; Alan E Mast; Joseph E Kiss; Daryl Kor; Jerome Gottschall; Yanyun Wu; Nareg Roubinian; Darrell Triulzi; Steve Kleinman; Young Choi; Donald Brambilla; Ann Zimrin Journal: Thromb Res Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 3.944
Authors: Nicholas S Roetker; Pamela L Lutsey; Neil A Zakai; Alvaro Alonso; Terrence J Adam; Richard F MacLehose Journal: Thromb Haemost Date: 2018-08-13 Impact factor: 5.249