BACKGROUND: The direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate (DE) may constitute a future replacement of vitamin K antagonists for long-term anticoagulation. Whereas warfarin pretreatment is associated with greater hematoma expansion after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), it remains unclear what effect direct thrombin inhibitors would have. Using different experimental models of ICH, this study compared hematoma volume among DE-treated mice, warfarin-treated mice, and controls. METHODS AND RESULTS: CD-1 mice were fed with DE or warfarin. Sham-treated mice served as controls. At the time point of ICH induction, DE mice revealed an increased activated partial thromboplastin time compared with controls (mean±SD 46.1 ± 5.0 versus 18.0 ± 1.5 seconds; P=0.022), whereas warfarin pretreatment resulted in a prothrombin time prolongation (51.4 ± 17.9 versus 10.4 ± 0.3 seconds; P<0.001). Twenty-four hours after collagenase-induced ICH formation, hematoma volume was 3.8 ± 2.9 μL in controls, 4.8 ± 2.7 μL in DE mice, and 14.5 ± 11.8 μL in warfarin mice (n=16; Welch ANOVA between-group differences P=0.007; posthoc analysis with the Dunnett method: DE versus controls, P=0.899; warfarin versus controls, P<0.001; DE versus warfarin, P=0.001). In addition, a model of laser-induced cerebral microhemorrhage was applied, and the distances that red blood cells and blood plasma were pushed into the brain were quantified. Warfarin mice showed enlarged red blood cell and blood plasma diameters compared to controls, but no difference was found between DE mice and controls. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast with warfarin, pretreatment with DE did not increase hematoma volume in 2 different experimental models of ICH. In terms of safety, this observation may represent a potential advantage of anticoagulation with DE over warfarin.
BACKGROUND: The direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate (DE) may constitute a future replacement of vitamin K antagonists for long-term anticoagulation. Whereas warfarin pretreatment is associated with greater hematoma expansion after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), it remains unclear what effect direct thrombin inhibitors would have. Using different experimental models of ICH, this study compared hematoma volume among DE-treated mice, warfarin-treated mice, and controls. METHODS AND RESULTS:CD-1mice were fed with DE or warfarin. Sham-treated mice served as controls. At the time point of ICH induction, DE mice revealed an increased activated partial thromboplastin time compared with controls (mean±SD 46.1 ± 5.0 versus 18.0 ± 1.5 seconds; P=0.022), whereas warfarin pretreatment resulted in a prothrombin time prolongation (51.4 ± 17.9 versus 10.4 ± 0.3 seconds; P<0.001). Twenty-four hours after collagenase-induced ICH formation, hematoma volume was 3.8 ± 2.9 μL in controls, 4.8 ± 2.7 μL in DE mice, and 14.5 ± 11.8 μL in warfarinmice (n=16; Welch ANOVA between-group differences P=0.007; posthoc analysis with the Dunnett method: DE versus controls, P=0.899; warfarin versus controls, P<0.001; DE versus warfarin, P=0.001). In addition, a model of laser-induced cerebral microhemorrhage was applied, and the distances that red blood cells and blood plasma were pushed into the brain were quantified. Warfarinmice showed enlarged red blood cell and blood plasma diameters compared to controls, but no difference was found between DE mice and controls. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast with warfarin, pretreatment with DE did not increase hematoma volume in 2 different experimental models of ICH. In terms of safety, this observation may represent a potential advantage of anticoagulation with DE over warfarin.
Authors: Nozomi Nishimura; Chris B Schaffer; Beth Friedman; Philbert S Tsai; Patrick D Lyden; David Kleinfeld Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: J Lorrain; L Millet; I Lechaire; S Lochot; P Ferrari; C Visconte; M Sainte-Marie; C Lunven; C N Berry; P Schaeffer; J-M Herbert; S E O'Connor Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Maria I Aguilar; Robert G Hart; Carlos S Kase; William D Freeman; Barbara J Hoeben; Rosa C García; Jack E Ansell; Stephan A Mayer; Bo Norrving; Jonathan Rosand; Thorsten Steiner; Eelco F M Wijdicks; Takenori Yamaguchi; Masahiro Yasaka Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Reha Celikel; Richard A McClintock; James R Roberts; G Loredana Mendolicchio; Jerry Ware; Kottayil I Varughese; Zaverio M Ruggeri Journal: Science Date: 2003-07-11 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Damon Klebe; Jerry J Flores; Devin W McBride; Paul R Krafft; William B Rolland; Tim Lekic; John H Zhang Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2016-12-20 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Susanne J van Veluw; Matthew P Frosch; Ashley A Scherlek; Daniel Lee; Steven M Greenberg; Brian J Bacskai Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2020-01-27 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Jennifer A Frontera; John J Lewin; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Imo P Aisiku; Anne W Alexandrov; Aaron M Cook; Gregory J del Zoppo; Monisha A Kumar; Ellinor I B Peerschke; Michael F Stiefel; Jeanne S Teitelbaum; Katja E Wartenberg; Cindy L Zerfoss Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Alvaro Alonso; Lindsay G S Bengtson; Richard F MacLehose; Pamela L Lutsey; Lin Y Chen; Kamakshi Lakshminarayan Journal: Stroke Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jan Hendrik Schaefer; Wendy Leung; Limin Wu; Elizabeth M Van Cott; Josephine Lok; Michael Whalen; Klaus van Leyen; Arne Lauer; Joanne van Ryn; Eng H Lo; Christian Foerch Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 6.200