BACKGROUND: Assessment and quantification of actual liver function is crucial in patients with chronic liver disease to monitor disease progression and predict individual prognosis. Mathematical models, such as model for end-stage liver disease, are used for risk stratification of patients with chronic liver disease but do not include parameters that reflect the actual functional state of the liver. AIM: We aimed to evaluate the potential of a (13)C-based liver function test as a stratification tool by comparison with other liver function tests and clinical parameters in a large sample of healthy controls and cirrhotic patients. METHODS: We applied maximum liver function capacity (LiMAx) to evaluate actual liver function in 347 patients with cirrhosis and in 86 controls. RESULTS: LiMAx showed strong negative correlation with Child-Pugh Score (r = -0.707; p < 0.001), MELD (r = -0.686; p < 0.001) and liver function tests. LiMAx was lower in patients with liver cirrhosis compared to healthy controls [99 (57-160) µg/kg/h vs. 412 (365-479) µg/kg/h, p < 0.001] and differed among Child-Pugh classes [a: 181 (144-227) µg/kg/h, b: 96 (62-132) µg/kg/h and c: 52 (37-81) µg/kg/h; p < 0.001]. When stratified patients according to disease severity, LiMAx results were not different between cirrhotic patients and cirrhotic patients with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. CONCLUSIONS: LiMAx appears to provide reliable information on remnant enzymatic liver function in chronic liver disease and allows graduation of disease severity.
BACKGROUND: Assessment and quantification of actual liver function is crucial in patients with chronic liver disease to monitor disease progression and predict individual prognosis. Mathematical models, such as model for end-stage liver disease, are used for risk stratification of patients with chronic liver disease but do not include parameters that reflect the actual functional state of the liver. AIM: We aimed to evaluate the potential of a (13)C-based liver function test as a stratification tool by comparison with other liver function tests and clinical parameters in a large sample of healthy controls and cirrhotic patients. METHODS: We applied maximum liver function capacity (LiMAx) to evaluate actual liver function in 347 patients with cirrhosis and in 86 controls. RESULTS:LiMAx showed strong negative correlation with Child-Pugh Score (r = -0.707; p < 0.001), MELD (r = -0.686; p < 0.001) and liver function tests. LiMAx was lower in patients with liver cirrhosis compared to healthy controls [99 (57-160) µg/kg/h vs. 412 (365-479) µg/kg/h, p < 0.001] and differed among Child-Pugh classes [a: 181 (144-227) µg/kg/h, b: 96 (62-132) µg/kg/h and c: 52 (37-81) µg/kg/h; p < 0.001]. When stratified patients according to disease severity, LiMAx results were not different between cirrhotic patients and cirrhotic patients with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. CONCLUSIONS:LiMAx appears to provide reliable information on remnant enzymatic liver function in chronic liver disease and allows graduation of disease severity.
Authors: P S Kamath; R H Wiesner; M Malinchoc; W Kremers; T M Therneau; C L Kosberg; G D'Amico; E R Dickson; W R Kim Journal: Hepatology Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Gordon Jung-Hyuk Park; Peter Harry Katelaris; D Brian Jones; Francis Seow; David George Le Couteur; Meng Chong Ngu Journal: Hepatology Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Maximilian Jara; Tomasz Dziodzio; Maciej Malinowski; Katja Lüttgert; Radoslav Nikolov; Paul Viktor Ritschl; Robert Öllinger; Johann Pratschke; Martin Stockmann Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2018-11-07 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Jan Bednarsch; Elisabeth Blüthner; Maciej Malinowski; Daniel Seehofer; Johann Pratschke; Martin Stockmann Journal: World J Surg Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Felix Krenzien; Moritz Schmelzle; Benjamin Struecker; Nathanael Raschzok; Christian Benzing; Maximilian Jara; Marcus Bahra; Robert Öllinger; Igor M Sauer; Andreas Pascher; Johann Pratschke; Andreas Andreou Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2018-01-23 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Maximilian Jara; Tim Reese; Maciej Malinowski; Erika Valle; Daniel Seehofer; Gero Puhl; Peter Neuhaus; Johann Pratschke; Martin Stockmann Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Friedrich Anger; Ingo Klein; Stefan Löb; Armin Wiegering; Gurinder Singh; Dominique Sperl; Oliver Götze; Andreas Geier; Johan Friso Lock Journal: Visc Med Date: 2020-06-12
Authors: S Cammann; F Oldhafer; K I Ringe; W Ramackers; K Timrott; M Kleine; J Klempnauer; F Lehner; H Bektas; F W R Vondran Journal: Int J Surg Case Rep Date: 2017-08-10
Authors: Patrick H Alizai; Annabel Haelsig; Philipp Bruners; Florian Ulmer; Christian D Klink; Cornelis H C Dejong; Ulf P Neumann; Maximilian Schmeding Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) Date: 2017-12-07
Authors: Tomasz Dziodzio; Robert Öllinger; Wenzel Schöning; Antonia Rothkäppel; Radoslav Nikolov; Andrzej Juraszek; Paul V Ritschl; Martin Stockmann; Johann Pratschke; Maximilian Jara Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2020-08-12 Impact factor: 3.067