Literature DB >> 24993545

Using the CER Hub to ensure data quality in a multi-institution smoking cessation study.

Kari L Walker1, Olga Kirillova1, Suzanne E Gillespie1, David Hsiao2, Valentyna Pishchalenko2, Akshatha Kalsanka Pai3, Jon E Puro4, Robert Plumley5, Rustam Kudyakov6, Weiming Hu1, Art Allisany1, MaryAnn McBurnie1, Stephen E Kurtz7, Brian L Hazlehurst1.   

Abstract

Comparative effectiveness research (CER) studies involving multiple institutions with diverse electronic health records (EHRs) depend on high quality data. To ensure uniformity of data derived from different EHR systems and implementations, the CER Hub informatics platform developed a quality assurance (QA) process using tools and data formats available through the CER Hub. The QA process, implemented here in a study of smoking cessation services in primary care, used the 'emrAdapter' tool programmed with a set of quality checks to query large samples of primary care encounter records extracted in accord with the CER Hub common data framework. The tool, deployed to each study site, generated error reports indicating data problems to be fixed locally and aggregate data sharable with the central site for quality review. Across the CER Hub network of six health systems, data completeness and correctness issues were prevalent in the first iteration and were considerably improved after three iterations of the QA process. A common issue encountered was incomplete mapping of local EHR data values to those defined by the common data framework. A highly automated and distributed QA process helped to ensure the correctness and completeness of patient care data extracted from EHRs for a multi-institution CER study in smoking cessation. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic medical records; Research data quality assurance

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24993545      PMCID: PMC4215049          DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  16 in total

1.  Using science to improve the nation's health system: NIH's commitment to comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Michael S Lauer; Francis S Collins
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: the intersection of science and health care.

Authors:  Carolyn Clancy; Francis S Collins
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Comparative effectiveness research and medical informatics.

Authors:  Leonard W D'Avolio; Wildon R Farwell; Louis D Fiore
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  HL7 Clinical Document Architecture, Release 2.

Authors:  Robert H Dolin; Liora Alschuler; Sandy Boyer; Calvin Beebe; Fred M Behlen; Paul V Biron; Amnon Shabo Shvo
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Prioritizing comparative-effectiveness research--IOM recommendations.

Authors:  John K Iglehart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The Shared Health Research Information Network (SHRINE): a prototype federated query tool for clinical data repositories.

Authors:  Griffin M Weber; Shawn N Murphy; Andrew J McMurry; Douglas Macfadden; Daniel J Nigrin; Susanne Churchill; Isaac S Kohane
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  White paper on CTSA consortium role in facilitating comparative effectiveness research: September 23, 2009 CTSA consortium strategic goal committee on comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Harry P Selker; Brian L Strom; Daniel E Ford; David O Meltzer; Stephen G Pauker; Harold A Pincus; Eugene C Rich; Chris Tompkins; Evelyn P Whitlock
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.689

Review 8.  Clinical research data warehouse governance for distributed research networks in the USA: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  John H Holmes; Thomas E Elliott; Jeffrey S Brown; Marsha A Raebel; Arthur Davidson; Andrew F Nelson; Annie Chung; Pierre La Chance; John F Steiner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  A survey of informatics platforms that enable distributed comparative effectiveness research using multi-institutional heterogenous clinical data.

Authors:  Dean F Sittig; Brian L Hazlehurst; Jeffrey Brown; Shawn Murphy; Marc Rosenman; Peter Tarczy-Hornoch; Adam B Wilcox
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  A pragmatic framework for single-site and multisite data quality assessment in electronic health record-based clinical research.

Authors:  Michael G Kahn; Marsha A Raebel; Jason M Glanz; Karen Riedlinger; John F Steiner
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  3 in total

1.  Long-Term Outcomes From Repeated Smoking Cessation Assistance in Routine Primary Care.

Authors:  Steffani R Bailey; Victor J Stevens; Stephen P Fortmann; Stephen E Kurtz; Mary Ann McBurnie; Elisa Priest; Jon Puro; Leif I Solberg; Rebecca Schweitzer; Andrew L Masica; Brian Hazlehurst
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2018-03-13

2.  Applying STOPP Guidelines in Primary Care Through Electronic Medical Record Decision Support: Randomized Control Trial Highlighting the Importance of Data Quality.

Authors:  Morgan Price; Iryna Davies; Raymond Rusk; Mary Lesperance; Jens Weber
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2017-06-15

3.  A method for interoperable knowledge-based data quality assessment.

Authors:  Erik Tute; Irina Scheffner; Michael Marschollek
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 2.796

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.