Laura Deckx1, Marjan van den Akker2, Frank Buntinx2. 1. Department of General Practice, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, Bus 7001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: Laura.deckx@med.kuleuven.be. 2. Department of General Practice, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, Bus 7001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, CAPHRI - School for Public Health and Primary Care, Peter Debeyeplein 1, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature on the severity and risk factors for loneliness in adult cancer patients. METHODS: We systematically reviewed quantitative studies addressing loneliness in cancer patients. Exclusion criteria were absence of a validated loneliness questionnaire, and studies that focused on loneliness determined by specific circumstances, and not cancer in general (e.g. appearance concerns, cultural and language barriers, requiring palliative care). We searched PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Pubmed in compliance with the predefined in- and exclusion criteria. The search, quality appraisal, and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Weighted mean scores were calculated by using random effects adjusted inverse variance weighting. RESULTS: We included 15 studies. In 13 studies the UCLA loneliness scale was used (range 20-80; higher scores indicate higher loneliness). The weighted mean loneliness score was 38.26 (95% CI: 35.51-41.00), which corresponds to moderate loneliness. Time since diagnosis was positively associated with degree of loneliness. Other cancer-related factors, such as cancer site, treatment type, or stage of disease were not associated with loneliness. The non-cancer related determinants of loneliness in cancer patients that emerged from our review were being unmarried (people who have never been married, are widowed or divorced), and lack of psychological or social support. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the level of loneliness rises with increasing time after cancer diagnosis. Furthermore, social functioning emerged as a consistent theme, for which it was shown that lack of social support was associated with increasing levels of loneliness.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature on the severity and risk factors for loneliness in adult cancerpatients. METHODS: We systematically reviewed quantitative studies addressing loneliness in cancerpatients. Exclusion criteria were absence of a validated loneliness questionnaire, and studies that focused on loneliness determined by specific circumstances, and not cancer in general (e.g. appearance concerns, cultural and language barriers, requiring palliative care). We searched PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Pubmed in compliance with the predefined in- and exclusion criteria. The search, quality appraisal, and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Weighted mean scores were calculated by using random effects adjusted inverse variance weighting. RESULTS: We included 15 studies. In 13 studies the UCLA loneliness scale was used (range 20-80; higher scores indicate higher loneliness). The weighted mean loneliness score was 38.26 (95% CI: 35.51-41.00), which corresponds to moderate loneliness. Time since diagnosis was positively associated with degree of loneliness. Other cancer-related factors, such as cancer site, treatment type, or stage of disease were not associated with loneliness. The non-cancer related determinants of loneliness in cancerpatients that emerged from our review were being unmarried (people who have never been married, are widowed or divorced), and lack of psychological or social support. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the level of loneliness rises with increasing time after cancer diagnosis. Furthermore, social functioning emerged as a consistent theme, for which it was shown that lack of social support was associated with increasing levels of loneliness.
Authors: Rebecca N Adams; Catherine E Mosher; Rafat Abonour; Michael J Robertson; Victoria L Champion; Kurt Kroenke Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: John M Salsman; James E Pustejovsky; Stephen M Schueller; Rosalba Hernandez; Mark Berendsen; Laurie E Steffen McLouth; Judith T Moskowitz Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2019-11-19 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Rebecca N Adams; Catherine E Mosher; Kevin L Rand; Adam T Hirsh; Patrick O Monahan; Rafat Abonour; Kurt Kroenke Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Allen C Sherman; Thomas V Merluzzi; James E Pustejovsky; Crystal L Park; Login George; George Fitchett; Heather S L Jim; Alexis R Munoz; Suzanne C Danhauer; Mallory A Snyder; John M Salsman Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ekin Secinti; Kevin L Rand; Shelley A Johns; Bert H O'Neil; Paul R Helft; Safi Shahda; Shadia I Jalal; Catherine E Mosher Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-09-17 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah; David Nogueras; Hugo Cornelis van Woerden; Vasiliki Kiparoglou Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Ulrike Boehmer; Al Ozonoff; Michael Winter; Flora Berklein; Jennifer Potter; Kevan L Hartshorn; Kevin C Ward; Rachel M Ceballos; Melissa A Clark Journal: Cancer Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 6.921