PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To identify situations and thoughts that may precipitate or protect against loneliness experienced by patients with cancer. RESEARCH APPROACH: Qualitative. SETTING: The hematology/oncology clinic at the Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, an outpatient oncology center in Indianapolis. PARTICIPANTS: Purposive sample of 15 patients undergoing treatment for multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: Individual, semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted. Theoretical thematic analysis was used to analyze interview data. FINDINGS: Factors that appeared to precipitate loneliness included several situations (e.g., physical isolation, social constraints such as criticism) and thoughts (e.g., unmet expectations for visits or questions about health, belief that others do not understand their cancer experience). Several situations (e.g., social support, normal routine) and thoughts (e.g., beliefs that time alone is desirable and that others' discomfort with cancer-related discussions is normative) appeared to protect against loneliness. Certain social situations were loneliness-inducing for some patients and not for others, suggesting that patients' thoughts about their situations, rather than the situations themselves, have the greatest impact on their loneliness. CONCLUSIONS: The current study fills gaps in loneliness theory by identifying cancer-related situations and thoughts that patients associate with their loneliness. Consistent with theory, patients reported feeling lonely when they had negative thoughts about their social situations. INTERPRETATION: Findings inform nursing assessment and intervention strategies to incorporate into care plans. For instance, when conducting assessments, nurses should be more attentive to patients' satisfaction with their social environment than actual characteristics of the environment. Normalizing patients' experiences and encouraging positive thoughts about others' behavior may reduce patients' loneliness.
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To identify situations and thoughts that may precipitate or protect against loneliness experienced by patients with cancer. RESEARCH APPROACH: Qualitative. SETTING: The hematology/oncology clinic at the Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, an outpatient oncology center in Indianapolis. PARTICIPANTS: Purposive sample of 15 patients undergoing treatment for multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: Individual, semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted. Theoretical thematic analysis was used to analyze interview data. FINDINGS: Factors that appeared to precipitate loneliness included several situations (e.g., physical isolation, social constraints such as criticism) and thoughts (e.g., unmet expectations for visits or questions about health, belief that others do not understand their cancer experience). Several situations (e.g., social support, normal routine) and thoughts (e.g., beliefs that time alone is desirable and that others' discomfort with cancer-related discussions is normative) appeared to protect against loneliness. Certain social situations were loneliness-inducing for some patients and not for others, suggesting that patients' thoughts about their situations, rather than the situations themselves, have the greatest impact on their loneliness. CONCLUSIONS: The current study fills gaps in loneliness theory by identifying cancer-related situations and thoughts that patients associate with their loneliness. Consistent with theory, patients reported feeling lonely when they had negative thoughts about their social situations. INTERPRETATION: Findings inform nursing assessment and intervention strategies to incorporate into care plans. For instance, when conducting assessments, nurses should be more attentive to patients' satisfaction with their social environment than actual characteristics of the environment. Normalizing patients' experiences and encouraging positive thoughts about others' behavior may reduce patients' loneliness.
Entities:
Keywords:
cancer; cognitions; loneliness; qualitative; social constraints; social support
Authors: Catherine E Mosher; Stephen J Lepore; Lisa Wu; Jane Austin; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Scott Rowley; Luis Isola; William H Redd; Christine Rini Journal: J Health Psychol Date: 2012-01-17
Authors: Bina Nausheen; Norman J Carr; Robert C Peveler; Rona Moss-Morris; Clare Verrill; Elizabeth Robbins; Karen P Nugent; Alex M Baker; Mary Judd; Yori Gidron Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2010-08-17 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Lisa M Jaremka; Christopher P Fagundes; Juan Peng; Jeanette M Bennett; Ronald Glaser; William B Malarkey; Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser Journal: Psychol Sci Date: 2013-04-29
Authors: Mackenzi Pergolotti; Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti; Lynne Padgett; Alix G Sleight; Maya Abdallah; Robin Newman; Kathleen Van Dyk; Kelley R Covington; Grant R Williams; Frederiek van den Bos; YaoYao Pollock; Elizabeth A Salerno; Allison Magnuson; Isabella F Gattás-Vernaglia; Tim A Ahles Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2019-10-14 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Jackelyn B Payne; Kaylin V Dance; Monique Farone; Anh Phan; Cathy D Ho; Meghan Gutierrez; Lillian Chen; Christopher R Flowers Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-07-29 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Rebecca N Adams; Catherine E Mosher; Kevin L Rand; Adam T Hirsh; Patrick O Monahan; Rafat Abonour; Kurt Kroenke Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Kah Poh Loh; Eric M McLaughlin; Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Oreofe O Odejide; Areej El-Jawahri; Lihong Qi; Aladdin H Shadyab; Lisa G Johnson; Electra D Paskett Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2022-08-18 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Cassandra A Hathaway; Amanda M Bloomer; Laura B Oswald; Erin M Siegel; Anita R Peoples; Cornelia M Ulrich; Frank J Penedo; Shelley S Tworoger; Brian D Gonzalez Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2022-04 Impact factor: 5.556