Jamie L Hanson1, Brendon M Nacewicz2, Matthew J Sutterer3, Amelia A Cayo4, Stacey M Schaefer4, Karen D Rudolph5, Elizabeth A Shirtcliff6, Seth D Pollak7, Richard J Davidson8. 1. Department of Psychology, Waisman Center University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; Center for Investigating Healthy Minds University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. Electronic address: jlh125@duke.edu. 2. School of Medicine & Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. 3. Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa. 4. Center for Investigating Healthy Minds University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. 5. Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois. 6. Department of Human Development and Family Studies, (EAS), Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. 7. Department of Psychology, Waisman Center University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. 8. Department of Psychology, Waisman Center University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; Center for Investigating Healthy Minds University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early life stress (ELS) can compromise development, with higher amounts of adversity linked to behavioral problems. To understand this linkage, a growing body of research has examined two brain regions involved with socioemotional functioning-amygdala and hippocampus. Yet empirical studies have reported increases, decreases, and no differences within human and nonhuman animal samples exposed to different forms of ELS. This divergence in findings may stem from methodological factors, nonlinear effects of ELS, or both. METHODS: We completed rigorous hand-tracing of the amygdala and hippocampus in three samples of children who experienced different forms of ELS (i.e., physical abuse, early neglect, or low socioeconomic status). Interviews were also conducted with children and their parents or guardians to collect data about cumulative life stress. The same data were also collected in a fourth sample of comparison children who had not experienced any of these forms of ELS. RESULTS: Smaller amygdala volumes were found for children exposed to these different forms of ELS. Smaller hippocampal volumes were also noted for children who were physically abused or from low socioeconomic status households. Smaller amygdala and hippocampal volumes were also associated with greater cumulative stress exposure and behavioral problems. Hippocampal volumes partially mediated the relationship between ELS and greater behavioral problems. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests ELS may shape the development of brain areas involved with emotion processing and regulation in similar ways. Differences in the amygdala and hippocampus may be a shared diathesis for later negative outcomes related to ELS.
BACKGROUND: Early life stress (ELS) can compromise development, with higher amounts of adversity linked to behavioral problems. To understand this linkage, a growing body of research has examined two brain regions involved with socioemotional functioning-amygdala and hippocampus. Yet empirical studies have reported increases, decreases, and no differences within human and nonhuman animal samples exposed to different forms of ELS. This divergence in findings may stem from methodological factors, nonlinear effects of ELS, or both. METHODS: We completed rigorous hand-tracing of the amygdala and hippocampus in three samples of children who experienced different forms of ELS (i.e., physical abuse, early neglect, or low socioeconomic status). Interviews were also conducted with children and their parents or guardians to collect data about cumulative life stress. The same data were also collected in a fourth sample of comparison children who had not experienced any of these forms of ELS. RESULTS: Smaller amygdala volumes were found for children exposed to these different forms of ELS. Smaller hippocampal volumes were also noted for children who were physically abused or from low socioeconomic status households. Smaller amygdala and hippocampal volumes were also associated with greater cumulative stress exposure and behavioral problems. Hippocampal volumes partially mediated the relationship between ELS and greater behavioral problems. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests ELS may shape the development of brain areas involved with emotion processing and regulation in similar ways. Differences in the amygdala and hippocampus may be a shared diathesis for later negative outcomes related to ELS.
Authors: Brendon M Nacewicz; Lisa Angelos; Kim M Dalton; Ron Fischer; Michael J Anderle; Andrew L Alexander; Richard J Davidson Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-09-05 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Stefan J Teipel; Michael Ewers; Stefanie Wolf; Frank Jessen; Heike Kölsch; Sönke Arlt; Christian Luckhaus; Peter Schönknecht; Klaus Schmidtke; Isabella Heuser; Lutz Frölich; Gabriele Ende; Johannes Pantel; Jens Wiltfang; Fabian Rakebrandt; Oliver Peters; Christine Born; Johannes Kornhuber; Harald Hampel Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2010-05-20 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Wendy L Hellerstedt; Nikki J Madsen; Megan R Gunnar; Harold D Grotevant; Richard M Lee; Dana E Johnson Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2007-06-12
Authors: Deanna M Barch; Elizabeth A Shirtcliff; Nourhan M Elsayed; Diana Whalen; Kirsten Gilbert; Alecia C Vogel; Rebecca Tillman; Joan L Luby Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-08-24 Impact factor: 11.205