Literature DB >> 18852470

Brain potentials to native phoneme discrimination reveal the origin of individual differences in learning the sounds of a second language.

Begoña Díaz1, Cristina Baus, Carles Escera, Albert Costa, Núria Sebastián-Gallés.   

Abstract

Human beings differ in their ability to master the sounds of their second language (L2). Phonetic training studies have proposed that differences in phonetic learning stem from differences in psychoacoustic abilities rather than speech-specific capabilities. We aimed at finding the origin of individual differences in L2 phonetic acquisition in natural learning contexts. We consider two alternative explanations: a general psychoacoustic origin vs. a speech-specific one. For this purpose, event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from two groups of early, proficient Spanish-Catalan bilinguals who differed in their mastery of the Catalan (L2) phonetic contrast /e-epsilon/. Brain activity in response to acoustic change detection was recorded in three different conditions involving tones of different length (duration condition), frequency (frequency condition), and presentation order (pattern condition). In addition, neural correlates of speech change detection were also assessed for both native (/o/-/e/) and nonnative (/o/-/ö/) phonetic contrasts (speech condition). Participants' discrimination accuracy, reflected electrically as a mismatch negativity (MMN), was similar between the two groups of participants in the three acoustic conditions. Conversely, the MMN was reduced in poor perceivers (PP) when they were presented with speech sounds. Therefore, our results support a speech-specific origin of individual variability in L2 phonetic mastery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18852470      PMCID: PMC2570969          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0805022105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  36 in total

1.  The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm).

Authors:  R Näätänen
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system.

Authors:  C T Best; G W McRoberts; E Goodell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Separate time behaviors of the temporal and frontal mismatch negativity sources.

Authors:  T Rinne; K Alho; R J Ilmoniemi; J Virtanen; R Näätänen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  The influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: exemplar-Based versus abstract lexical entries.

Authors:  C Pallier; A Colomé; N Sebastián-Gallés
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-11

5.  Cerebral mechanisms underlying orienting of attention towards auditory frequency changes.

Authors:  E Yago; C Escera; K Alho; M H Giard
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-08-08       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Online processing of native and non-native phonemic contrasts in early bilinguals.

Authors:  N Sebastián-Gallés; S Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-09-30

7.  Direct evidence for differential roles of temporal and frontal components of auditory change detection.

Authors:  Shani Shalgi; Leon Y Deouell
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses.

Authors:  R Näätänen; A Lehtokoski; M Lennes; M Cheour; M Huotilainen; A Iivonen; M Vainio; P Alku; R J Ilmoniemi; A Luuk; J Allik; J Sinkkonen; K Alho
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Deficits in auditory temporal and spectral resolution in language-impaired children.

Authors:  B A Wright; L J Lombardino; W M King; C S Puranik; C M Leonard; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-05-08       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The accuracy of sound duration representation in the human brain determines the accuracy of behavioural perception.

Authors:  E Amenedo; C Escera
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.386

View more
  24 in total

1.  Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design.

Authors:  Tyler K Perrachione; Jiyeon Lee; Louisa Y Y Ha; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Phoneme discrimination and mismatch negativity in English and Japanese speakers.

Authors:  Marie D Bomba; David Choly; Elizabeth W Pang
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Tests of a Dual-systems Model of Speech Category Learning.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2014-10-01

4.  Relationship between individual differences in speech processing and cognitive functions.

Authors:  Jinghua Ou; Sam-Po Law; Roxana Fung
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

5.  Differences in phonetic discrimination stem from differences in psychoacoustic abilities in learning the sounds of a second language: Evidence from ERP research.

Authors:  Yi Lin; Ruolin Fan; Lei Mo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Native phonological processing abilities predict post-consolidation nonnative contrast learning in adults.

Authors:  F Sayako Earle; Dana T Arthur
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  The five myths of MMN: redefining how to use MMN in basic and clinical research.

Authors:  E S Sussman; S Chen; J Sussman-Fort; E Dinces
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  The effect of age of acquisition, socioeducational status, and proficiency on the neural processing of second language speech sounds.

Authors:  Pilar Archila-Suerte; Jason Zevin; Arturo E Hernandez
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Auditory perception at the root of language learning.

Authors:  Jutta L Mueller; Angela D Friederici; Claudia Männel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast.

Authors:  Jessamyn Schertz; Taehong Cho; Andrew Lotto; Natasha Warner
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2015-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.