Literature DB >> 24990679

Harmonic calls and indifferent females: no preference for human consonance in an anuran.

Karin L Akre1, Ximena Bernal2, A Stanley Rand3, Michael J Ryan4.   

Abstract

The human music faculty might have evolved from rudimentary components that occur in non-human animals. The evolutionary history of these rudimentary perceptual features is not well understood and rarely extends beyond a consideration of vertebrates that possess a cochlea. One such antecedent is a preferential response to what humans perceive as consonant harmonic sounds, which are common in many animal vocal repertoires. We tested the phonotactic response of female túngara frogs (Physalaemus pustulosus) to variations in the frequency ratios of their harmonically structured mating call to determine whether frequency ratio influences attraction to acoustic stimuli in this vertebrate that lacks a cochlea. We found that the ratio of frequencies present in acoustic stimuli did not influence female response. Instead, the amount of inner ear stimulation predicted female preference behaviour. We conclude that the harmonic relationships that characterize the vocalizations of these frogs did not evolve in response to a preference for frequency intervals with low-integer ratios. Instead, the presence of harmonics in their mating call, and perhaps in the vocalizations of many other animals, is more likely due to the biomechanics of sound production rather than any preference for 'more musical' sounds.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal communication; consonance; music; receiver psychology; signal evolution

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24990679      PMCID: PMC4100515          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  31 in total

1.  Music perception and octave generalization in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  A A Wright; J J Rivera; S H Hulse; M Shyan; J J Neiworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2000-09

2.  Cognition and the evolution of music: pitfalls and prospects.

Authors:  Henkjan Honing; Annemie Ploeger
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-07-03

Review 3.  The capacity for music: what is it, and what's special about it?

Authors:  Ray Jackendoff; Fred Lerdahl
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-12-27

4.  Do ferrets perceive relative pitch?

Authors:  Pingbo Yin; Jonathan B Fritz; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A bond graph approach to modeling the anuran vocal production system.

Authors:  Nicole M Kime; Michael J Ryan; Preston S Wilson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Are consonant intervals music to their ears? Spontaneous acoustic preferences in a nonhuman primate.

Authors:  Josh McDermott; Marc Hauser
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-12

7.  Spontaneous motor entrainment to music in multiple vocal mimicking species.

Authors:  Adena Schachner; Timothy F Brady; Irene M Pepperberg; Marc D Hauser
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Neural correlates of consonance, dissonance, and the hierarchy of musical pitch in the human brainstem.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Musical ratios in sounds from the human cochlea.

Authors:  Katarzyna J Blinowska; Konrad Kwaskiewicz; W Wiktor Jedrzejczak; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Auditory same/different concept learning and generalization in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus).

Authors:  Marisa Hoeschele; Robert G Cook; Lauren M Guillette; Allison H Hahn; Christopher B Sturdy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Treefrogs exploit temporal coherence to form perceptual objects of communication signals.

Authors:  Saumya Gupta; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Is consonance attractive to budgerigars? No evidence from a place preference study.

Authors:  Bernhard Wagner; Daniel L Bowling; Marisa Hoeschele
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Commentary: Cats prefer species-appropriate music.

Authors:  Cinzia Chiandetti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-04-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.