BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Investigators have suggested that the chemokine receptor CCR1 plays a role in multiple myeloma. Studies using antisense and neutralizing antibodies to CCR1 showed that down-regulation of the receptor altered disease progression in a mouse model. More recently, experiments utilizing scid mice injected with human myeloma cells demonstrated that the CCR1 antagonist BX471 reduced osteolytic lesions, while the CCR1 antagonist MLN-3897 prevented myeloma cell adhesion to osteoclasts. However, information is limited regarding the pharmacology of CCR1 antagonists in myeloma cells. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We compared several well-studied CCR1 antagonists including AZD4818, BX471, CCX354, CP-481715, MLN-3897 and PS899877 for their ability to inhibit binding of [(125)I]-CCL3 in vitro using membranes prepared from RPMI 8226 cells, a human multiple myeloma cell line that endogenously expresses CCR1. In addition, antagonists were assessed for their ability to modulate CCL3-mediated internalization of CCR1 and CCL3-mediated cell migration using RPMI 8226 cells. As many GPCRs signal through β-arrestin-dependent pathways that are separate and distinct from those driven by G-proteins, we also evaluated the compounds for their ability to alter β-arrestin translocation. KEY RESULTS: There were clear differences between the CCR1 antagonists in their ability to inhibit CCL3 binding to myeloma cells, as well as in their ability to inhibit G-protein-dependent and -independent functional responses. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our studies demonstrate that tissue phenotype seems to be relevant with regards to CCR1. Moreover, it appears that for CCR1 antagonists, inhibition of β-arrestin translocation is not necessarily linked to chemotaxis or receptor internalization.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Investigators have suggested that the chemokine receptor CCR1 plays a role in multiple myeloma. Studies using antisense and neutralizing antibodies to CCR1 showed that down-regulation of the receptor altered disease progression in a mouse model. More recently, experiments utilizing scid mice injected with humanmyeloma cells demonstrated that the CCR1 antagonist BX471 reduced osteolytic lesions, while the CCR1 antagonist MLN-3897 prevented myeloma cell adhesion to osteoclasts. However, information is limited regarding the pharmacology of CCR1 antagonists in myeloma cells. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We compared several well-studied CCR1 antagonists including AZD4818, BX471, CCX354, CP-481715, MLN-3897 and PS899877 for their ability to inhibit binding of [(125)I]-CCL3 in vitro using membranes prepared from RPMI 8226 cells, a humanmultiple myeloma cell line that endogenously expresses CCR1. In addition, antagonists were assessed for their ability to modulate CCL3-mediated internalization of CCR1 and CCL3-mediated cell migration using RPMI 8226 cells. As many GPCRs signal through β-arrestin-dependent pathways that are separate and distinct from those driven by G-proteins, we also evaluated the compounds for their ability to alter β-arrestin translocation. KEY RESULTS: There were clear differences between the CCR1 antagonists in their ability to inhibit CCL3 binding to myeloma cells, as well as in their ability to inhibit G-protein-dependent and -independent functional responses. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our studies demonstrate that tissue phenotype seems to be relevant with regards to CCR1. Moreover, it appears that for CCR1 antagonists, inhibition of β-arrestin translocation is not necessarily linked to chemotaxis or receptor internalization.
Authors: Nagarajan Vaidehi; Sabine Schlyer; Rene J Trabanino; Wely B Floriano; Ravinder Abrol; Shantanu Sharma; Monica Kochanny; Sunil Koovakat; Laura Dunning; Meina Liang; James M Fox; Filipa Lopes de Mendonça; James E Pease; William A Goddard; Richard Horuk Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2006-07-12 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: A Gilchrist; M R Mazzoni; B Dineen; A Dice; J Linden; W R Proctor; C R Lupica; T V Dunwiddie; H E Hamm Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1998-06-12 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Yasuo Oba; Jun Won Lee; Lori A Ehrlich; Ho Yeon Chung; Diane F Jelinek; Natalie S Callander; Richard Horuk; Sun Jin Choi; G David Roodman Journal: Exp Hematol Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: C L Tsou; R P Gladue; L A Carroll; T Paradis; J G Boyd; R T Nelson; K Neote; I F Charo Journal: J Exp Med Date: 1998-08-03 Impact factor: 14.307