Literature DB >> 24986945

The influence of surgical factors on dislocation of the meniscal bearing after Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a case-control study.

S Y Lee1, J H Bae2, J G Kim2, K M Jang1, W Y Shon1, K W Kim2, H C Lim1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for dislocation of the bearing after a mobile-bearing Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) and to test the hypothesis that surgical factors, as measured from post-operative radiographs, are associated with its dislocation From a total of 480 UKRs performed between 2001 and 2012, in 391 patients with a mean age of 66.5 years (45 to 82) (316 female, 75 male), we identified 17 UKRs where bearing dislocation occurred. The post-operative radiological measurements of the 17 UKRs and 51 matched controls were analysed using conditional logistic regression analysis. The post-operative radiological measurements included post-operative change in limb alignment, the position of the femoral and tibial components, the resection depth of the proximal tibia, and the femoral component-posterior condyle classification. We concluded that a post-operative decrease in the posterior tibial slope relative to the pre-operative value was the only significant determinant of dislocation of the bearing after medial Oxford UKR (odds ratio 1.881; 95% confidence interval 1.272 to 2.779). A post-operative posterior tibial slope < 8.45° and a difference between the pre-operative and post-operative posterior tibial slope of > 2.19° may increase the risk of dislocation. ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bearing dislocation; Risk factor; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24986945     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.33352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Recommendations for unicondylar knee replacement in the course of time : A current inventory].

Authors:  J Beckmann; M T Hirschmann; G Matziolis; J Holz; R V Eisenhart-Rothe; C Becher
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Up to twelve year follow-up of the Oxford phase three unicompartmental knee replacement in China: seven hundred and eight knees from an independent centre.

Authors:  Huaming Xue; Yihui Tu; Tong Ma; Tao Wen; Tao Yang; Minwei Cai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  A novel radiographic technique to assess 180° rotational spin of the Oxford unicompartmental knee mobile bearing.

Authors:  Salman Jamshed; Rohi Shah; Arrish Arooj; Adrian Turner; Christos Plakogiannis
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-26

4.  Dependence of knee range of motion on the alignment of femoral and tibial components after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mitsuru Hanada; Kensuke Hotta; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-08-20

5.  Posterior condylar offset and posterior tibial slope targets to optimize knee flexion after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yong Zhi Khow; Ming Han Lincoln Liow; Merrill Lee; Jerry Yongqiang Chen; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Does Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Affect Tibial Bone Strain? A Paired Cadaveric Comparison of Fixed- and Mobile-bearing Designs.

Authors:  Geert Peersman; Orcun Taylan; Joshua Slane; Ben Vanthienen; Jeroen Verhaegen; Lyne Anthonissen; G Harry van Lenthe; Thomas Heyse; Lennart Scheys
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Redislocation after Bearing Exchange for the Treatment of Mobile Bearing Dislocation in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sang-Gyun Kim; Hyun-Gon Kim; Seung-Yup Lee; Hong-Chul Lim; Ji-Hoon Bae
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-09-01

8.  Bearing dislocation of mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in East Asian countries: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaowei Sun; Pei Liu; Feifan Lu; Weiguo Wang; Wanshou Guo; Qidong Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Can accuracy of component alignment be improved with Oxford UKA Microplasty® instrumentation?

Authors:  Jonathan Patrick Ng; Jason Chi Ho Fan; Lawrence Chun Man Lau; Tycus Tao Sun Tse; Samuel Yik Cheung Wan; Yuk Wah Hung
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 2.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.