Literature DB >> 24986756

Sequence design and evaluation of the reproducibility of water-selective diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast at 3 T.

He Zhu1, Lori R Arlinghaus, Jennifer G Whisenant, Ming Li, John C Gore, Thomas E Yankeelov.   

Abstract

Diffusion measurements derived from breast MRI can be adversely affected by unwanted signals from abundant fatty tissues if they are not suppressed adequately. To minimize this undesired contribution, we designed and optimized a water-selective diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequence, which relies on spectrally selective excitation on the water resonance, obviating the need for fat suppression. As this method is more complex than standard DWI methods, we also report a test-retest study to evaluate its reproducibility. In this study, a spectrally selective Gaussian pulse on water resonance was combined with a pair of slice-selective adiabatic refocusing pulses for water-only DWI. Field map-based shimming and manual determination of the center frequency were used for water selection. The selectivity of the excitation pulse was optimized by a spectrally selective spectroscopy sequence based on the same principles. A test-retest study of 10 volunteers in two separate visits was used to evaluate its reproducibility. Our results from all subjects showed high-quality diffusion-weighted images of the breast without fat contamination. Mean apparent diffusion coefficients for b = 0, 600 s/mm(2) and b = 50, 600 s/mm(2) all showed good reproducibility, as 95% confidence intervals of the apparent diffusion coefficients were 4 × 10(-5)  mm(2) /s and 5 × 10(-5)  mm(2) /s and repeatability values were 1.09 × 10(-4) and 1.31 × 10(-4) , respectively. In conclusion, water-selective DWI is a feasible alternative to standard methods of DWI based on fat suppression. The added complexity of the method does not compromise the reproducibility of diffusion measurements in the breast.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apparent diffusion coefficient; breast; reproducibility; spectrally selective

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24986756      PMCID: PMC4134406          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  41 in total

Review 1.  Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Roland Bammer
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  High-resolution human diffusion tensor imaging using 2-D navigated multishot SENSE EPI at 7 T.

Authors:  Ha-Kyu Jeong; John C Gore; Adam W Anderson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Early detection of regional cerebral ischemia in cats: comparison of diffusion- and T2-weighted MRI and spectroscopy.

Authors:  M E Moseley; Y Cohen; J Mintorovitch; L Chileuitt; H Shimizu; J Kucharczyk; M F Wendland; P R Weinstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Diffusion-weighted MRI in pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Raphael Richard; Isabelle Thomassin; Marion Chapellier; Aurélie Scemama; Patricia de Cremoux; Mariana Varna; Sylvie Giacchetti; Marc Espié; Eric de Kerviler; Cedric de Bazelaire
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Designing adiabatic radio frequency pulses using the Shinnar-Le Roux algorithm.

Authors:  Priti Balchandani; John Pauly; Daniel Spielman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Spectrally selective 3D TSE imaging of phosphocreatine in the human calf muscle at 3 T.

Authors:  Prodromos Parasoglou; Ding Xia; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of locally advanced breast cancer: predicting response with in vivo (1)H MR spectroscopy--a pilot study at 4 T.

Authors:  Sina Meisamy; Patrick J Bolan; Eva H Baker; Robin L Bliss; Evin Gulbahce; Lenore I Everson; Michael T Nelson; Tim H Emory; Todd M Tuttle; Douglas Yee; Michael Garwood
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Amide proton transfer imaging of the breast at 3 T: establishing reproducibility and possible feasibility assessing chemotherapy response.

Authors:  Adrienne N Dula; Lori R Arlinghaus; Richard D Dortch; Blake E Dewey; Jennifer G Whisenant; Gregory D Ayers; Thomas E Yankeelov; Seth A Smith
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Tumors in pediatric patients at diffusion-weighted MR imaging: apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor cellularity.

Authors:  Paul D Humphries; Neil J Sebire; Marilyn J Siegel; Øystein E Olsen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Imaging in breast cancer: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Patrick J Bolan; Michael T Nelson; Douglas Yee; Michael Garwood
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  3 in total

1.  Repeatability, reproducibility, and accuracy of quantitative mri of the breast in the community radiology setting.

Authors:  Anna G Sorace; Chengyue Wu; Stephanie L Barnes; Angela M Jarrett; Sarah Avery; Debra Patt; Boone Goodgame; Jeffery J Luci; Hakmook Kang; Richard G Abramson; Thomas E Yankeelov; John Virostko
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Bloch-Siegert B1-Mapping Improves Accuracy and Precision of Longitudinal Relaxation Measurements in the Breast at 3 T.

Authors:  Jennifer G Whisenant; Richard D Dortch; William Grissom; Hakmook Kang; Lori R Arlinghaus; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2016-12

Review 3.  Transformational Role of Medical Imaging in (Radiation) Oncology.

Authors:  Catherine Coolens; Matt N Gwilliam; Paula Alcaide-Leon; Isabella Maria de Freitas Faria; Fabio Ynoe de Moraes
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 6.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.