Sarah J Nelson1, Achuta K Kadambi2, Ilwoo Park2, Yan Li2, Jason Crane2, Marram Olson2, Annette Molinaro1,3, Ritu Roy2, Nicholas Butowski1,3, Soonmee Cha4,1,3, Susan Chang1. 1. Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, California. 2. Surbeck Laboratory of Advanced Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California. 3. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California. 4. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Abstract
Background: The heterogeneous biology of glioblastoma (GBM) emphasizes the need for imaging methods to assess tumor burden and assist in evaluating individual patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate early changes in metrics from 3D 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) data, compare them with anatomic lesion volumes, and determine whether they were associated with survival for patients with newly diagnosed GBM receiving a multimodality treatment regimen. Methods: Serial MRI and MRSI scans provided estimates of anatomic lesion volumes and levels of choline, creatine, N-acetylaspartate, lactate, and lipid. The association of metrics derived from these data with survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models with adjustments for age, Karnofsky performance score, and extent of resection. Temporal changes in parameters were evaluated using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: Anatomic lesion volumes at the post-radiotherapy (RT) scan, metabolic lesion volume at mid-RT and post-RT scans, as well as metrics describing levels of choline, lactate, and lipid were associated with overall survival. There was a significant reduction in the enhancing lesion volume, increase in T2 lesion volume from mid-RT to post-RT, and decrease in parameters describing metabolite levels during these early time points. Conclusion: The MRSI data provided metrics that described the effects of treatment on the metabolic lesion burden and were associated with overall survival. This suggests that adding these parameters to standard assessments of changes in anatomic lesion volumes could contribute to making early decisions about the efficacy of such combination therapies.
Background: The heterogeneous biology of glioblastoma (GBM) emphasizes the need for imaging methods to assess tumor burden and assist in evaluating individual patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate early changes in metrics from 3D 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) data, compare them with anatomic lesion volumes, and determine whether they were associated with survival for patients with newly diagnosed GBM receiving a multimodality treatment regimen. Methods: Serial MRI and MRSI scans provided estimates of anatomic lesion volumes and levels of choline, creatine, N-acetylaspartate, lactate, and lipid. The association of metrics derived from these data with survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models with adjustments for age, Karnofsky performance score, and extent of resection. Temporal changes in parameters were evaluated using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: Anatomic lesion volumes at the post-radiotherapy (RT) scan, metabolic lesion volume at mid-RT and post-RT scans, as well as metrics describing levels of choline, lactate, and lipid were associated with overall survival. There was a significant reduction in the enhancing lesion volume, increase in T2 lesion volume from mid-RT to post-RT, and decrease in parameters describing metabolite levels during these early time points. Conclusion: The MRSI data provided metrics that described the effects of treatment on the metabolic lesion burden and were associated with overall survival. This suggests that adding these parameters to standard assessments of changes in anatomic lesion volumes could contribute to making early decisions about the efficacy of such combination therapies.
Authors: Ilwoo Park; Gregory Tamai; Michael C Lee; Cynthia F Chuang; Susan M Chang; Mitchel S Berger; Sarah J Nelson; Andrea Pirzkall Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-05-21 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Ilwoo Park; Albert P Chen; Matthew L Zierhut; Esin Ozturk-Isik; Daniel B Vigneron; Sarah J Nelson Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2010-07-23 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Yan Li; Janine M Lupo; Mei-Yin Polley; Jason C Crane; Wei Bian; Soonmee Cha; Susan Chang; Sarah J Nelson Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2011-02-04 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Forrest W Crawford; Inas S Khayal; Colleen McGue; Suja Saraswathy; Andrea Pirzkall; Soonmee Cha; Kathleen R Lamborn; Susan M Chang; Mitchel S Berger; Sarah J Nelson Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2008-11-15 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Julia Cluceru; Sarah J Nelson; Qiuting Wen; Joanna J Phillips; Anny Shai; Annette M Molinaro; Paula Alcaide-Leon; Marram P Olson; Devika Nair; Marisa LaFontaine; Pranathi Chunduru; Javier E Villanueva-Meyer; Soonmee Cha; Susan M Chang; Mitchel S Berger; Janine M Lupo Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-10-14 Impact factor: 13.029
Authors: Ovidiu C Andronesi; Morteza Esmaeili; Ronald J H Borra; Kyrre Emblem; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Marco C Pinho; Scott R Plotkin; Andrew S Chi; April F Eichler; Jorg Dietrich; S Percy Ivy; Patrick Y Wen; Dan G Duda; Rakesh Jain; Bruce R Rosen; Gregory A Sorensen; Tracy T Batchelor Journal: NPJ Precis Oncol Date: 2017-06-12
Authors: Victor Ruiz-Rodado; Jeffery R Brender; Murali K Cherukuri; Mark R Gilbert; Mioara Larion Journal: Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc Date: 2020-12-02 Impact factor: 9.795
Authors: Jason C Crane; Jeremy W Gordon; Hsin-Yu Chen; Adam W Autry; Yan Li; Marram P Olson; John Kurhanewicz; Daniel B Vigneron; Peder E Z Larson; Duan Xu Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2020-03-19 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Andrew A Maudsley; Ovidiu C Andronesi; Peter B Barker; Alberto Bizzi; Wolfgang Bogner; Anke Henning; Sarah J Nelson; Stefan Posse; Dikoma C Shungu; Brian J Soher Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2020-04-29 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Silvia Valtorta; Daniela Salvatore; Paolo Rainone; Sara Belloli; Gloria Bertoli; Rosa Maria Moresco Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 5.923