Literature DB >> 24986743

Relative biological effectiveness variation along monoenergetic and modulated Bragg peaks of a 62-MeV therapeutic proton beam: a preclinical assessment.

Pankaj Chaudhary1, Thomas I Marshall1, Francesca M Perozziello2, Lorenzo Manti2, Frederick J Currell3, Fiona Hanton3, Stephen J McMahon1, Joy N Kavanagh1, Giuseppe Antonio Pablo Cirrone4, Francesco Romano4, Kevin M Prise5, Giuseppe Schettino6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The biological optimization of proton therapy can be achieved only through a detailed evaluation of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) variations along the full range of the Bragg curve. The clinically used RBE value of 1.1 represents a broad average, which disregards the steep rise of linear energy transfer (LET) at the distal end of the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP). With particular attention to the key endpoint of cell survival, our work presents a comparative investigation of cell killing RBE variations along monoenergetic (pristine) and modulated (SOBP) beams using human normal and radioresistant cells with the aim to investigate the RBE dependence on LET and intrinsic radiosensitvity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Human fibroblasts (AG01522) and glioma (U87) cells were irradiated at 6 depth positions along pristine and modulated 62-MeV proton beams at the INFN-LNS (Catania, Italy). Cell killing RBE variations were measured using standard clonogenic assays and were further validated using Monte Carlo simulations and the local effect model (LEM).
RESULTS: We observed significant cell killing RBE variations along the proton beam path, particularly in the distal region showing strong dose dependence. Experimental RBE values were in excellent agreement with the LEM predicted values, indicating dose-averaged LET as a suitable predictor of proton biological effectiveness. Data were also used to validate a parameterized RBE model.
CONCLUSIONS: The predicted biological dose delivered to a tumor region, based on the variable RBE inferred from the data, varies significantly with respect to the clinically used constant RBE of 1.1. The significant RBE increase at the distal end suggests also a potential to enhance optimization of treatment modalities such as LET painting of hypoxic tumors. The study highlights the limitation of adoption of a constant RBE for proton therapy and suggests approaches for fast implementation of RBE models in treatment planning.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24986743     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  54 in total

1.  Analysis of the track- and dose-averaged LET and LET spectra in proton therapy using the geant4 Monte Carlo code.

Authors:  Fada Guan; Christopher Peeler; Lawrence Bronk; Changran Geng; Reza Taleei; Sharmalee Randeniya; Shuaiping Ge; Dragan Mirkovic; David Grosshans; Radhe Mohan; Uwe Titt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Glioblastoma multiforme: emerging treatments and stratification markers beyond new drugs.

Authors:  C von Neubeck; A Seidlitz; H H Kitzler; B Beuthien-Baumann; M Krause
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Proton RBE dependence on dose in the setting of hypofractionation.

Authors:  Thomas Friedrich
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Using the Proton Energy Spectrum and Microdosimetry to Model Proton Relative Biological Effectiveness.

Authors:  Mark Newpower; Darshana Patel; Lawrence Bronk; Fada Guan; Pankaj Chaudhary; Stephen J McMahon; Kevin M Prise; Giuseppe Schettino; David R Grosshans; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 5.  Radiation oncology in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Michael Baumann; Mechthild Krause; Jens Overgaard; Jürgen Debus; Søren M Bentzen; Juliane Daartz; Christian Richter; Daniel Zips; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Why RBE must be a variable and not a constant in proton therapy.

Authors:  Bleddyn Jones
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Radiobiological issues in proton therapy.

Authors:  Radhe Mohan; Christopher R Peeler; Fada Guan; Lawrence Bronk; Wenhua Cao; David R Grosshans
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 8.  Modelling variable proton relative biological effectiveness for treatment planning.

Authors:  Aimee McNamara; Henning Willers; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Exponential Increase in Relative Biological Effectiveness Along Distal Edge of a Proton Bragg Peak as Measured by Deoxyribonucleic Acid Double-Strand Breaks.

Authors:  John J Cuaron; Chang Chang; Michael Lovelock; Daniel S Higginson; Dennis Mah; Oren Cahlon; Simon Powell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  Novel applications of proton therapy in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  John J Cuaron; Shannon M MacDonald; Oren Cahlon
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.