OBJECTIVE: Low-grade serous (LGS) ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer is a rare disease with limited therapeutic options. Low response rates are observed with cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, significant responses have been reported in patients treated with bevacizumab. The objective of this study was to determine the response rate to bevacizumab with or without concurrent chemotherapy in patients with recurrent serous borderline or LGS ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer. METHODS: This single-institution retrospective study examined the response rate to treatment with bevacizumab in patients with serous borderline or LGS cancer. Patients were treated at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 2005 and 2012. The best overall response was determined with the use of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients were identified, 15 of whom were evaluable for the primary end point of best overall response. Two patients were treated with bevacizumab as a single agent, and the remainder received bevacizumab in conjunction with chemotherapy (paclitaxel, topotecan, oral cyclophosphamide, gemcitabine, or gemcitabine and carboplatin). The median duration of bevacizumab administration in evaluable patients was 23 weeks (mean, 32.2 weeks; range, 6-79.4 weeks). There were no complete responses. Partial responses were observed in 6 patients (5 patients received concurrent paclitaxel, and 1 patient received concurrent gemcitabine). The overall response rate was 40%, with a response rate of 55% among the subgroup of patients with LGS cancer. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy is an active treatment for recurrent LGS ovarian cancer. A prospective trial of bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel for the treatment of LGS ovarian cancer should be considered.
OBJECTIVE: Low-grade serous (LGS) ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer is a rare disease with limited therapeutic options. Low response rates are observed with cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, significant responses have been reported in patients treated with bevacizumab. The objective of this study was to determine the response rate to bevacizumab with or without concurrent chemotherapy in patients with recurrent serous borderline or LGS ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer. METHODS: This single-institution retrospective study examined the response rate to treatment with bevacizumab in patients with serous borderline or LGS cancer. Patients were treated at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 2005 and 2012. The best overall response was determined with the use of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients were identified, 15 of whom were evaluable for the primary end point of best overall response. Two patients were treated with bevacizumab as a single agent, and the remainder received bevacizumab in conjunction with chemotherapy (paclitaxel, topotecan, oral cyclophosphamide, gemcitabine, or gemcitabine and carboplatin). The median duration of bevacizumab administration in evaluable patients was 23 weeks (mean, 32.2 weeks; range, 6-79.4 weeks). There were no complete responses. Partial responses were observed in 6 patients (5 patients received concurrent paclitaxel, and 1 patient received concurrent gemcitabine). The overall response rate was 40%, with a response rate of 55% among the subgroup of patients with LGS cancer. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy is an active treatment for recurrent LGS ovarian cancer. A prospective trial of bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel for the treatment of LGS ovarian cancer should be considered.
Authors: David M Gershenson; Charlotte C Sun; Karen H Lu; Robert L Coleman; Anil K Sood; Anais Malpica; Michael T Deavers; Elvio G Silva; Diane C Bodurka Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Kathleen M Schmeler; Charlotte C Sun; Diane C Bodurka; Michael T Deavers; Anais Malpica; Robert L Coleman; Pedro T Ramirez; David M Gershenson Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2007-12-26 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Agustin A Garcia; Hal Hirte; Gini Fleming; Dongyun Yang; Denice D Tsao-Wei; Lynda Roman; Susan Groshen; Steve Swenson; Frank Markland; David Gandara; Sidney Scudder; Robert Morgan; Helen Chen; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Amit M Oza Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Stephen A Cannistra; Ursula A Matulonis; Richard T Penson; Julie Hambleton; Jakob Dupont; Howard Mackey; Jeffrey Douglas; Robert A Burger; Deborah Armstrong; Robert Wenham; William McGuire Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-11-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Robert A Burger; Michael W Sill; Bradley J Monk; Benjamin E Greer; Joel I Sorosky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-11-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David M Gershenson; Charlotte C Sun; Diane Bodurka; Robert L Coleman; Karen H Lu; Anil K Sood; Michael Deavers; Anais L Malpica; John J Kavanagh Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2009-04-10 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Heather J Dalton; Nicole D Fleming; Charlotte C Sun; Priya Bhosale; Kathleen M Schmeler; David M Gershenson Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-01-27 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: David M Gershenson; Diane C Bodurka; Robert L Coleman; Karen H Lu; Anais Malpica; Charlotte C Sun Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gulisa Turashvili; Rachel N Grisham; Sarah Chiang; Deborah F DeLair; Kay J Park; Robert A Soslow; Rajmohan Murali Journal: Histopathology Date: 2018-06-22 Impact factor: 5.087