Literature DB >> 18769340

Subdividing ovarian and peritoneal serous carcinoma into moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated does not have biologic validity based on molecular genetic and in vitro drug resistance data.

Russell Vang1, Ie-Ming Shih, Ritu Salani, Elizabeth Sugar, Ayse Ayhan, Robert J Kurman.   

Abstract

Serous carcinoma of the ovary has been traditionally graded as well-differentiated, moderately differentiated, and poorly differentiated (ie, a 3-tier system). A new 2-tier system grades serous carcinomas into low or high grade. Recent morphologic and molecular studies have shown that invasive well-differentiated serous carcinoma, referred to by us as "invasive low-grade micropapillary serous carcinoma," is clearly distinct from high-grade serous carcinoma from the standpoint of pathogenesis and clinicopathologic features. As high-grade serous carcinoma is histologically heterogeneous, the goal of this study was to determine, based on molecular and drug resistance data, whether further subclassification of high-grade serous carcinomas into additional grades (moderately and poorly differentiated) has biologic validity. One hundred eleven ovarian and peritoneal high-grade serous carcinomas further subclassified as moderately and poorly differentiated types using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grading system were analyzed for TP53 mutations and in vitro extreme drug resistance to 10 chemotherapeutic drugs. Seventy-six and 35 cases were subclassified as moderately and poorly differentiated, respectively. A TP53 mutation was present in 84% of moderately and 70% of poorly differentiated types of high-grade serous carcinomas, respectively (P=0.21), and there were no significant differences in the frequency of extreme drug resistance for each of the 10 drugs tested (P values ranging from 0.14 to >0.99). Although additional investigation is warranted, this study suggests that subclassification of high-grade serous carcinoma into moderately and poorly differentiated is not relevant. Accordingly, they can be simply classified as high-grade serous carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18769340     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31816fd555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  14 in total

Review 1.  Ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Kathleen R Cho; Ie-Ming Shih
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 23.472

Review 2.  Ovarian low-grade and high-grade serous carcinoma: pathogenesis, clinicopathologic and molecular biologic features, and diagnostic problems.

Authors:  Russell Vang; Ie-Ming Shih; Robert J Kurman
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.875

Review 3.  [Histological grading of epithelial ovarian cancer. Review and recommendation].

Authors:  S Hauptmann; A du Bois; I Meinhold-Herlein; J Pfisterer; S Avril
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  A binary histologic grading system for ovarian serous carcinoma is an independent prognostic factor: a population-based study of 4317 women diagnosed in Denmark 1978-2006.

Authors:  Charlotte Gerd Hannibal; Russell Vang; Jette Junge; Anette Kjaerbye-Thygesen; Robert J Kurman; Susanne K Kjaer
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  BRAF mutation is associated with early stage disease and improved outcome in patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Rachel N Grisham; Gopa Iyer; Karuna Garg; Deborah Delair; David M Hyman; Qin Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; Michael F Berger; Fanny Dao; David R Spriggs; Douglas A Levine; Carol Aghajanian; David B Solit
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  p53 autoantibodies as potential detection and prognostic biomarkers in serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Karen S Anderson; Jessica Wong; Allison Vitonis; Christopher P Crum; Patrick M Sluss; Joshua Labaer; Daniel Cramer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Molecular characterization of 103 ovarian serous and mucinous tumors.

Authors:  Ildikó Vereczkey; Orsolya Serester; Judit Dobos; Mónika Gallai; Orsolya Szakács; Zoltán Szentirmay; Erika Tóth
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.201

8.  BRAF mutation is rare in advanced-stage low-grade ovarian serous carcinomas.

Authors:  Kwong-Kwok Wong; Yvonne T M Tsang; Michael T Deavers; Samuel C Mok; Zhifei Zu; Charlotte Sun; Anais Malpica; Judith K Wolf; Karen H Lu; David M Gershenson
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Extreme Outlier Analysis Identifies Occult Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway Mutations in Patients With Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Rachel N Grisham; Brooke E Sylvester; Helen Won; Gregory McDermott; Deborah DeLair; Ricardo Ramirez; Zhan Yao; Ronglai Shen; Fanny Dao; Faina Bogomolniy; Vicky Makker; Evis Sala; Tara E Soumerai; David M Hyman; Nicholas D Socci; Agnes Viale; David M Gershenson; John Farley; Douglas A Levine; Neal Rosen; Michael F Berger; David R Spriggs; Carol A Aghajanian; David B Solit; Gopa Iyer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Bevacizumab shows activity in patients with low-grade serous ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer.

Authors:  Rachel N Grisham; Gopa Iyer; Evis Sala; Qin Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; Deborah DeLair; David M Hyman; Carol Aghajanian
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.