| Literature DB >> 24978287 |
Abstract
Soon after the 9-11 attacks, politicians and scientists began to question our ability to cope with a large-scale radiological terrorism incident. The outline of what was needed was fairly obvious: the ability to prevent such an attack, methods to cope with the medical consequences, the ability to clean up afterward, and the tools to figure out who perpetrated the attack and bring them to justice. The medical response needed three components: the technology to determine rapidly the radiation doses received by a large number of people, methods for alleviating acute hematological radiation injuries, and therapies for mitigation and treatment of chronic radiation injuries. Research done to date has shown that a realistic medical response plan is scientifically possible, but the regulatory and financial barriers to achieving this may currently be insurmountable.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24978287 PMCID: PMC4076685 DOI: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000082
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Phys ISSN: 0017-9078 Impact factor: 1.316