| Literature DB >> 24977047 |
Sunil Kumar Sirohi1, Navneet Goel1, Nasib Singh2.
Abstract
The present study was undertaken to investigate the effect of crude seed powder (CSP) and gross saponins extract (GSE) of seeds of Albizia lebbeck on antimicrobial activity by taking two Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus cereus), two Gram-negative (Escherichia coli and Salmonella Typhi) bacteria, and two fungi species (Aspergillus niger and Candida butyric) were taken at 25, 50, 100, 250, and 500 µg levels using agar well diffusion method. Zone of inhibition was increased with increasing of concentration of CSP and saponins which indicates that Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli), Gram-positive bacteria (B. cereus), and A. niger were significantly susceptible to inhibition. Another experiment was conducted to study the effect of GSE and saponins fraction A and B of A. lebbeck supplementation at 6% on DM basis on methane production and other rumen fermentation parameters using in vitro gas production test, by taking three different type diets, that is, high fiber diet (D1, 60R : 40C), medium fiber diet (D2, 50R : 50C), and low fiber diet (D3, 40R : 60C). Significant (P ≤ 0.05) increase was seen in IVDMD, methane production; however ammonia nitrogen concentration decreased as compared to control. The methane production was reduced in a range between 12 and 49% by saponin supplemented diets except in case of GSE in D2. Sap A showed the highest methane reduction per 200 mg of truly digested substrate (TDS) than other treatment groups. Results in relation with quantification of methanogens and protozoa by qPCR indicated the decreasing trend with saponins of A. lebbek in comparison with control except total methanogen quantified using mcr-A based primer.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24977047 PMCID: PMC4060550 DOI: 10.1155/2014/498218
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISRN Vet Sci ISSN: 2090-4452
Effects of A. lebbeck saponins fractions on total gas potential (96 h) using D2 as a substrate.
| Equation: | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| Control | 186.35 ± 5.07 | 0.215 ± 0.015 | 0.993 |
| GSE | 220.14 ± 8.10 | 0.195 ± 0.015 | 0.989 |
| Sap A | 175.69 ± 8.17 | 0.181 ± 0.020 | 0.986 |
| Sap B | 209.03 ± 8.44 | 0.191 ± 0.195 | 0.988 |
GSE: gross saponins extract, b: potential gas production (mL); c: gas production rate constant (mL/h), R 2: regression coefficient.
In vitro antibacterial and antifungal activities (zone of inhibition in mm) of A. lebback treatments using agar well diffusion method.
| Tested microorganisms | Zone of inhibition (CSP) | Zone of inhibition (GSE) | Positive control | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Types | Names | Specimen number | Concentration (µg) | ||||||||||
| 500 | 250 | 100 | 50 | 25 | 500 | 250 | 100 | 50 | 25 | ||||
| Gram-negative bacteria |
| NCDC 135 | 7.2 | 4.8 | 3.3 | 1.3 | nz | 12.8 | 8.9 | 7.3 | 4.0 | 1.9 | 17.7a |
|
| NCDC 113 | 3.9 | 2.6 | 1.1 | nz | nz | 9.2 | 5.9 | 5.7 | 2.8 | nz | 14.7a | |
| Gram-positive bacteria |
| MTCC 1144 | 3.4 | 2.1 | 0.9 | nz | nz | 7.4 | 6.2 | 5.0 | 2.3 | nz | 9.3b |
|
| NCDC 240 | 7.8 | 4.4 | 2.3 | 1.8 | nz | 13.3 | 10.1 | 6.3 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 16.7b | |
| Fungi |
| NCDC 280 | 0.8 | nz | nz | nz | nz | 3.2 | 1.2 | nz | nz | nz | 6.0c |
|
| NCDC 315 | 6.7 | 4.3 | 1.0 | nz | nz | 11.8 | 8.5 | 3.0 | 1.4 | nz | 13.2c | |
Sterile broth medium as negative control.
aKanamycin sulphate (50 µg/well).
bChloramphenicol (30 µg/well).
cNystatin (50 µg/well).
Nz: No zone.
Chemical composition of diets.
| Diets | Chemical constituents of diets (g/kg on DM basis) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| (D1) | (D2) | (D3) | |
| OM | 867.6 | 878.4 | 875.6 |
| CP | 108.6 | 125.3 | 142.7 |
| EE | 23.4 | 30.4 | 34.8 |
| NDF | 623.1 | 604.5 | 538.7 |
| ADF | 372.0 | 329.5 | 298.7 |
| HC | 251.1 | 275.0 | 240.0 |
| TA | 132.4 | 121.6 | 124.4 |
D1: high fiber diet, D2: medium fiber diet, D3: low fiber diet, OM: organic matter, CP: crude protein, EE: ether extract, NDF: neutral detergent fiber, ADF: acid detergent fiber, HC: hemicelluloses, TA: total Ash.
Effects of A. lebbeck saponins fractions on IVDMD, PF, MBM, and methane production.
| Parameters | Diets | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1
| D2
| D3
| SEM | ||||||||||||
| Control | GSE | Sap A | Sap B | Control | GSE | Sap A | Sap B | Control | GSE | Sap A | Sap B | Diet | Treatment | D ∗ T | |
| IVDMD% | 54.85 ± 0.13 | 61.84 ± 0.84 | 63.26 ± 0.18 | 54.62 ± 0.71 | 70.07 ± 0.67 | 68.80 ± 0.93 | 74.63 ± 0.79 | 75.24 ± 0.25 | 67.86 ± 0.15 | 63.11 ± 0.34 | 69.25 ± 1.24 | 64.25 ± 0.06 | 0.645 | 0.744 | 1.289 |
| PF | 3.41 ± 0.03 | 3.91 ± 0.08 | 4.16 ± 0.05 | 3.34 ± 0.02 | 3.40 ± 0.03 | 2.62 ± 0.06 | 3.04 ± 0.07 | 3.24 ± 0.06 | 3.38 ± 0.19 | 3.10 ± 0.07 | 3.52 ± 0.04 | 3.17 ± 0.06 | 0.054 | 0.062 | 0.107 |
| MBM | 37.99 ± 0.56 | 53.87 ± 2.06 | 59.83 ± 0.20 | 36.58 ± 0.77 | 47.50 ± 1.11 | 19.46 ± 3.16 | 38.63 ± 2.80 | 45.85 ± 1.76 | 46.62 ± 1.89 | 35.49 ± 2.05 | 51.83 ± 1.94 | 37.95 ± 2.14 | 1.763 | 2.036 | 3.526 |
| CH4
| 54.85 ± 2.17 | 43.74 ± 2.26 | 29.10 ± 1.67 | 34.66 ± 0.91 | 57.94 ± 1.96 | 76.59 ± 1.18 | 51.25 ± 0.74 | 50.97 ± 0.61 | 61.00 ± 0.36 | 45.37 ± 0.90 | 32.31 ± 2.22 | 31.11 ± 0.75 | 2.875 | 3.319 | 5.750 |
| CH4
| 2.20 ± 0.09 | 1.75 ± 0.09 | 1.17 ± 0.07 | 1.39 ± 0.04 | 2.32 ± 0.08 | 3.07 ± 0.05 | 2.05 ± 0.03 | 2.04 ± 0.02 | 2.44 ± 0.014 | 1.82 ± 0.04 | 1.29 ± 0.09 | 1.25 ± 0.03 | 0.115 | 0.133 | 0.230 |
| M/TDS | 0.49 ± 0.01 | 0.34 ± 0.02 | 0.22 ± 0.00 | 0.31 ± 0.01 | 0.41 ± 0.02 | 0.55 ± 0.01 | 0.34 ± 0.01 | 0.33 ± 0.00 | 0.28 ± 0.03 | 0.35 ± 0.01 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 0.021 | 0.024 | 0.041 |
D1: high fiber diet, D2: medium fiber diet, D3: low fiber diet, GSE: gross saponins extract, IVDMD: in vitro dry matter digestibility, PF: partition factor, MBM: microbial biomass, CH4: methane, M/TDS: methane (mL) per 200 mg true digestible substrate; SEM: standard error of means.
Effects of A. lebbeck saponins fractions on volatile fatty acid and ammonia nitrogen.
| Parameters | Diets | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 (60 | D2(50 | D3(40 | SEM | ||||||||||||
| Control | GSE | Sap A | Sap B | Control | GSE | Sap A | Sap B | Control | GSE | Sap A | Sap B | Diet | Treatment | D ∗ T | |
| Acetate | 9.24 ± 0.12 | 8.13 ± 0.10 | 8.40 ± 0.16 | 7.23 ± 0.30 | 9.19 ± 0.21 | 9.28 ± 0.10 | 9.41 ± 0.09 | 10.62 ± 0.03 | 8.02 ± 0.13 | 8.48 ± 0.27 | 8.40 ± 0.54 | 8.47 ± 0.32 | 0.165 | 0.191 | 0.330 |
| Propionate (mM/100 mL) | 2.53 ± 0.10 | 2.16 ± 0.08 | 2.25 ± 0.11 | 1.93 ± 0.16 | 2.65 ± 0.11 | 2.70 ± 0.14 | 3.00 ± 0.06 | 3.61 ± 0.04 | 2.29 ± 0.06 | 2.19 ± 0.14 | 2.48 ± 0.28 | 1.91 ± 0.08 | 0.064 | 0.077 | 0.133 |
| Butyrate | 1.09 ± 0.06 | 0.89 ± 0.06 | 0.99 ± 0.02 | 0.89 ± 0.01 | 1.02 ± 0.04 | 0.94 ± 0.07 | 1.01 ± 0.02 | 1.18 ± 0.01 | 1.05 ± 0.04 | 1.18 ± 0.016 | 0.92 ± 0.214 | 0.97 ± 0.05 | 0.046 | 0.053 | 0.092 |
| C2 : C3 | 3.65 ± 0.12 | 3.76 ± 0.10 | 3.74 ± 0.16 | 3.77 ± 0.30 | 3.48 ± 0.21 | 3.44 ± 0.10 | 3.14 ± 0.09 | 2.94 ± 0.03 | 3.50 ± 0.13 | 3.90 ± 0.27 | 3.51 ± 0.54 | 4.47 ± 0.32 | 0.119 | 0.137 | 0.238 |
| NH3-N | 19.23 ± 0.09 | 18.48 ± 0.16 | 16.43 ± 0.09 | 15.49 ± 0.09 | 17.36 ± 0.16 | 15.87 ± 0.49 | 12.13 ± 0.09 | 10.64 ± 0.16 | 19.79 ± 0.09 | 19.13 ± 0.09 | 16.43 ± 0.09 | 16.05 ± 0.09 | 0.092 | 0.106 | 0.183 |
D1: high fiber diet, D2: medium fiber diet, D3: low fiber diet, GSE: gross saponins extract, C2 : C3: acetate to propionate ratio, NH3-N: ammonia nitrogen, SEM: standard error of means.
Figure 1Effects of A. lebbeck saponins fractions on total gas potential (96 h) using D2 as a substrate.
Effects of A. lebbeck saponins fractions on methane gas potential (96 h) using D2 as a substrate.
| Equation: | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| Control | 55.865 ± 1.82 | 0.192 ± 0.015 | 0.992 |
| GSE | 67.24 ± 3.61 | 0.174 ± 0.02 | 0.982 |
| Sap A | 53.54 ± 3.28 | 0.166 ± 0.02 | 0.979 |
| Sap B | 61.14 ± 3.50 | 0.169 ± 0.02 | 0.981 |
GSE: gross saponins extract, b: potential methane gas production (mL); c: methane production rate constant (mL/h), R 2: regression coefficient.
Figure 2Effects of A. lebbeck saponins fractions on methane gas potential (96 h) using D2 as a substrate.
Real-time PCR quantification of changes in rumen microbial population on supplementation of A. lebbeck (saponins fractions).
| Microbial groups | Control diet (D2) | D2 + GSE | D2 + Sap A | D2 + Sap B | SEM | CD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMB | 1.00 | 0.318 | 0.484 | 1.581 | 0.091 | 0.321 |
| Protozoa | 1.00 | 0.940 | 0.649 | 0.985 | 0.070 | 0.247 |
| mcrA | 1.00 | 0.584 | 3.198 | 3.392 | 0.881 | N.S. |
MMB: methanomicrobiales; mcr A: total methanogens quantified using mcr A gene; in control diet population of all microbes considered as 1.00 then relative abundance is calculated with treatment.