Literature DB >> 24973602

A study-specific fMRI normalization approach that operates directly on high resolution functional EPI data at 7 Tesla.

Günther Grabner1, Benedikt A Poser2, Kyoko Fujimoto3, Jonathan R Polimeni4, Lawrence L Wald4, Siegfried Trattnig5, Ivan Toni6, Markus Barth7.   

Abstract

Due to the availability of ultra-high field scanners and novel imaging methods, high resolution, whole brain functional MR imaging (fMRI) has become increasingly feasible. However, it is common to use extensive spatial smoothing to account for inter-subject anatomical variation when pooling over subjects. This reduces the spatial details of group level functional activation considerably, even when the original data was acquired with high resolution. In our study we used an accelerated 3D EPI sequence at 7 Tesla to acquire whole brain fMRI data with an isotropic spatial resolution of 1.1mm which shows clear gray/white matter contrast due to the stronger T1 weighting of 3D EPI. To benefit from the high spatial resolution on the group level, we develop a study specific, high resolution anatomical template which is facilitated by the good anatomical contrast that is present in the average functional EPI images. Different template generations with increasing accuracy were created by using a hierarchical linear and stepwise non-linear registration approach. As the template is based on the functional data themselves no additional co-registration step with the usual T1-weighted anatomical data is necessary which eliminates a potential source of misalignment. To test the improvement of functional localization and spatial details we performed a group level analysis of a finger tapping experiment in eight subjects. The most accurate template shows better spatial localization--such as a separation of somatosensory and motor areas and of single digit activation--compared to the simple linear registration. The number of activated voxels is increased by a factor of 1.2, 2.5, and 3.1 for somatosensory, supplementary motor area, and dentate nucleus, respectively, for the functional contrast between left versus right hand. Similarly, the number of activated voxels is increased 1.4- and 2.4-fold for right little versus right index finger and left little versus left index finger, respectively. The Euclidian distance between the activation (center of gravity) of the respective fingers was found to be 13.90 mm using the most accurate template.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24973602      PMCID: PMC4143421          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  44 in total

1.  Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of FMRI data.

Authors:  M W Woolrich; B D Ripley; M Brady; S M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Finger somatotopy in human motor cortex.

Authors:  R Beisteiner; C Windischberger; R Lanzenberger; V Edward; R Cunnington; M Erdler; A Gartus; B Streibl; E Moser; L Deecke
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Brain templates and atlases.

Authors:  Alan C Evans; Andrew L Janke; D Louis Collins; Sylvain Baillet
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Isotropic submillimeter fMRI in the human brain at 7 T: combining reduced field-of-view imaging and partially parallel acquisitions.

Authors:  Robin M Heidemann; Dimo Ivanov; Robert Trampel; Fabrizio Fasano; Heiko Meyer; Josef Pfeuffer; Robert Turner
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Group specific vein-atlasing: an application for analyzing the venous system under normal and multiple sclerosis conditions.

Authors:  Günther Grabner; Assunta Dal-Bianco; Simon Hametner; Hans Lassmann; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM).

Authors:  J Mazziotta; A Toga; A Evans; P Fox; J Lancaster; K Zilles; R Woods; T Paus; G Simpson; B Pike; C Holmes; L Collins; P Thompson; D MacDonald; M Iacoboni; T Schormann; K Amunts; N Palomero-Gallagher; S Geyer; L Parsons; K Narr; N Kabani; G Le Goualher; D Boomsma; T Cannon; R Kawashima; B Mazoyer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2001-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Human finger somatotopy in areas 3b, 1, and 2: a 7T fMRI study using a natural stimulus.

Authors:  Roberto Martuzzi; Wietske van der Zwaag; Juliane Farthouat; Rolf Gruetter; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 9.  Fast robust automated brain extraction.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Fingersomatotopy in area 3b: an fMRI-study.

Authors:  Danielle van Westen; Peter Fransson; Johan Olsrud; Birgitta Rosén; Göran Lundborg; Elna-Marie Larsson
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-20       Impact factor: 3.288

View more
  12 in total

1.  Inter-subject Registration of Functional Images: Do We Need Anatomical Images?

Authors:  Elvis Dohmatob; Gael Varoquaux; Bertrand Thirion
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 2.  Analysis strategies for high-resolution UHF-fMRI data.

Authors:  Jonathan R Polimeni; Ville Renvall; Natalia Zaretskaya; Bruce Fischl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Probabilistic conversion of neurosurgical DBS electrode coordinates into MNI space.

Authors:  Andreas Horn; Andrea A Kühn; Angela Merkl; Ludy Shih; Ron Alterman; Michael Fox
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Challenges and opportunities for brainstem neuroimaging with ultrahigh field MRI.

Authors:  Roberta Sclocco; Florian Beissner; Marta Bianciardi; Jonathan R Polimeni; Vitaly Napadow
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  The impact of T1 versus EPI spatial normalization templates for fMRI data analyses.

Authors:  Vince D Calhoun; Tor D Wager; Anjali Krishnan; Keri S Rosch; Karen E Seymour; Mary Beth Nebel; Stewart H Mostofsky; Prashanth Nyalakanai; Kent Kiehl
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Visualizing the Human Subcortex Using Ultra-high Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  M C Keuken; B R Isaacs; R Trampel; W van der Zwaag; B U Forstmann
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 7.  Brainstem neuroimaging of nociception and pain circuitries.

Authors:  Vitaly Napadow; Roberta Sclocco; Luke A Henderson
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2019-08-07

8.  Single session imaging of cerebellum at 7 Tesla: obtaining structure and function of multiple motor subsystems in individual subjects.

Authors:  Melissa A Batson; Natalia Petridou; Dennis W J Klomp; Maarten A Frens; Sebastiaan F W Neggers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A structural group-connectome in standard stereotactic (MNI) space.

Authors:  Andreas Horn
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2015-09-07

10.  Consistency of magnetoencephalographic functional connectivity and network reconstruction using a template versus native MRI for co-registration.

Authors:  Linda Douw; Dagmar Nieboer; Cornelis J Stam; Prejaas Tewarie; Arjan Hillebrand
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-10-08       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.