Literature DB >> 26543893

A structural group-connectome in standard stereotactic (MNI) space.

Andreas Horn1.   

Abstract

A group connectome of 20 subjects has been normalized into standard stereotactic (MNI) space. Data has been processed using the Gibbs' Tracking approach (Reisert et al., 2011) [11] and normalized into standard space using DARTEL (Ashburner, 2007) [1]. All data has been acquired within the scope of the study A. Horn, D. Ostwald, M. Reisert, F. Blankenburg, The structural-functional connectome and the default mode network of the human brain, NeuroImage 102 (2013) 142-151. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.069. The utility of this dataset can be described by the following points: In medical studies in which subject-specific dMRI is not available, a standardized connectome may help to gain some canonical insight into white-matter connectivity. The dataset enables scientists who use different modalities (like EEG, MEG etc.) without access to MRI, to combine studies obtained using other methodology with insights from the brain's inner structural formation. The dataset could also extend possible claims made by meta-analyzes/literature-based studies.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26543893      PMCID: PMC4589797          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2015.08.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table Value of the data Canonical template of the white-matter architecture of the human brain. Perform fiber tracking within standardized MNI space. Study structural connectivity of normal brain anatomy.

Data, experimental design, materials and methods

A previously published tractography dataset from 20 normal subjects was used to establish the group-connectome in standard stereotactic (MNI) space [9]. For details of this dataset and tractography (pre-)processing, please refer to the primary publication [9]. Briefly, MRI data including diffusion-weighted images were collected via a single-shot spin-echo planar imaging sequence (TR=10,000 ms, TE=94 ms, 2×2×2 mm3, 69 slices) from 20 healthy subjects. An effective b-value of 1000 s/mm2 was used for each of 61 diffusion-encoding directions. The current dataset includes data from one additional subject, a 27-y-old male that was not included in the original publication because of artifacts in fMRI sequences (diffusion data were artifact free). Diffusion data from each subject were processed using the global Gibbs' tracking approach [11] using standard parameters. This approach models data based on properties of a whole-brain fiber set that is subsequently compared and optimized to the whole-brain diffusion MRI data in an iterative optimization routine. The approach was top performer in a blinded comparison of different tractography processing algorithms [4]. Connectivity data from each subject then were normalized to MNI space using a diffeomorphic image registration algorithm as implemented in SPM8 ([1]; www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/) to create a single group-level connectivity dataset. The resulting dataset is available in Matlab (http://www.mathworks.com/) and TrackVis (http://trackvis.org) formats and can be used to perform ‘fiber-tracking’ in form of a post-hoc fiber-selection of fibers from the whole-brain dataset. It can be directly used to perform analyzes in LEAD DBS (www.lead-dbs.org; Matlab; [13]) and TrackVis software. Fig. 1 shows 3% of fibers stored within the dataset.
Fig. 1

Rendering of the group connectome based on 20 subjects. 3% of all estimated fibers are shown, color-coded by traversing direction (xyz-directions mapping to rgb colors respectively). Visualization of fibers was done using TrackVis software (www.trackvis.org).

The following non-exhaustive list of potential use-cases may illustrate the utility of the data set: In medical studies where subject-specific dMRI is not available and cannot be acquired, a standardized group-connectome might help to gain at least some canonical insight into white-matter connectivity if the interpretation of results is done carefully. A direct example is the field of deep brain stimulation (DBS), where patients are subject to a very limited signal absorption rate (SAR) and thus dMRI can only be acquired with many limitations postoperatively. However, in DBS, electrode locations can be precisely modeled (Horn, 2015), and their spatial relationship to fiber-tracts can lead to profound insight into the mechanism of action of DBS [2,3]. An example use case is illustrated in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2

Example application of the group connectome. Deep brain stimulation electrodes of a patient suffering from Parkinson's Disease were reconstructed based on post-operative structural MR imaging. The volume of tissue that was stimulated (VAT) was estimated based on a model by Mädler and Coenen [6] and the actual stimulation settings of the patient's implanted pulse generator. Fiber tracts that traversed through the VAT were selected from the group connectome. Areas that were connected to the VAT by selected fiber tracts were selected from the automated anatomic labeling (AAL) atlas [12] and visualized. In addition to AAL regions, subcortical nuclei from the ATAG-atlas [10] are visualized: striatum (red), external part of the pallidum (blue), internal part (cyan), subthalamic nucleus (orange), red nucleus (green), substantia nigra (yellow). Analyzes and visualization were performed directly within MNI space using LEAD-DBS software (Horn, 2015; www.lead-dbs.org).

The dataset may enable scientists working in different fields of research (e.g. in machine-learning) and use different methodologies (e.g. EEG, MEG), to enhance their studies with insights from the brain's inner structural architecture. The dataset could also extend possible claims made by meta-analyzes/literature-based studies (e.g. see Fox et al. (2014) [5], where this connectome has already been applied). Last, in fMRI imaging, it is common to use extensive spatial smoothing to account for inter-subject anatomical variation when pooling over subjects [8]. This group-connectome may yield potential to do so more elaborately, i.e. based on structural connectivity – as has been done based on functional imaging [7]. Taken together, a whole-brain structural group connectome based on 20 healthy subjects that can be used to perform ‘fiber tracking’ in terms of a post-hoc fiber selection directly within MNI-space is released alongside this publication. The dataset can be used to study the white matter architecture of the human brain, as a ‘reference connectome’ or to study particular white matter tracts within a well-characterized and widely applied standardized stereotactic space.
Subject areaNeuroscience
More specific subject areaConnectomics
Type of dataFiberset of structural pathways of the human brain
How data was acquiredDiffusion-weighted MRI
Data formatMATLAB/Trackvis
Experimental factorsGibbs' fiber-tracking, DARTEL normalization
Experimental featuresThe dataset can be used to perform fiber-tracking in terms of a fiber-selection within standard stereotactic MNI space.
Data source locationBerlin, Charité – University Medicine, Berlin Center for Advanced Neuroimaging (BCAN)
Data accessibilityData is downloadable without restriction using the following URL:www.lead-dbs.org/?page_id=23
  13 in total

1.  Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain.

Authors:  N Tzourio-Mazoyer; B Landeau; D Papathanassiou; F Crivello; O Etard; N Delcroix; B Mazoyer; M Joliot
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Global fiber reconstruction becomes practical.

Authors:  Marco Reisert; Irina Mader; Constantin Anastasopoulos; Matthias Weigel; Susanne Schnell; Valerij Kiselev
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Explaining clinical effects of deep brain stimulation through simplified target-specific modeling of the volume of activated tissue.

Authors:  B Mädler; V A Coenen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm.

Authors:  John Ashburner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  The structural-functional connectome and the default mode network of the human brain.

Authors:  Andreas Horn; Dirk Ostwald; Marco Reisert; Felix Blankenburg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Quantitative evaluation of 10 tractography algorithms on a realistic diffusion MR phantom.

Authors:  Pierre Fillard; Maxime Descoteaux; Alvina Goh; Sylvain Gouttard; Ben Jeurissen; James Malcolm; Alonso Ramirez-Manzanares; Marco Reisert; Ken Sakaie; Fatima Tensaouti; Ting Yo; Jean-François Mangin; Cyril Poupon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Lead-DBS: a toolbox for deep brain stimulation electrode localizations and visualizations.

Authors:  Andreas Horn; Andrea A Kühn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Resting-state networks link invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation across diverse psychiatric and neurological diseases.

Authors:  Michael D Fox; Randy L Buckner; Hesheng Liu; M Mallar Chakravarty; Andres M Lozano; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A role of diffusion tensor imaging fiber tracking in deep brain stimulation surgery: DBS of the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract (drt) for the treatment of therapy-refractory tremor.

Authors:  Volker A Coenen; Niels Allert; Burkhard Mädler
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  A study-specific fMRI normalization approach that operates directly on high resolution functional EPI data at 7 Tesla.

Authors:  Günther Grabner; Benedikt A Poser; Kyoko Fujimoto; Jonathan R Polimeni; Lawrence L Wald; Siegfried Trattnig; Ivan Toni; Markus Barth
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  3 in total

1.  Lead-DBS v2: Towards a comprehensive pipeline for deep brain stimulation imaging.

Authors:  Andreas Horn; Ningfei Li; Till A Dembek; Ari Kappel; Chadwick Boulay; Siobhan Ewert; Anna Tietze; Andreas Husch; Thushara Perera; Wolf-Julian Neumann; Marco Reisert; Hang Si; Robert Oostenveld; Christopher Rorden; Fang-Cheng Yeh; Qianqian Fang; Todd M Herrington; Johannes Vorwerk; Andrea A Kühn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Probabilistic conversion of neurosurgical DBS electrode coordinates into MNI space.

Authors:  Andreas Horn; Andrea A Kühn; Angela Merkl; Ludy Shih; Ron Alterman; Michael Fox
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Charting the road forward in psychiatric neurosurgery: proceedings of the 2016 American Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery workshop on neuromodulation for psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Ausaf A Bari; Charles B Mikell; Aviva Abosch; Sharona Ben-Haim; Robert J Buchanan; Allen W Burton; Stephen Carcieri; G Rees Cosgrove; Pierre-Francois D'Haese; Zafiris Jeffrey Daskalakis; Emad N Eskandar; Jason L Gerrard; Wayne K Goodman; Benjamin David Greenberg; Robert E Gross; Clement Hamani; Zelma H T Kiss; Peter Konrad; Brian H Kopell; Lothar Krinke; Jean-Philippe Langevin; Andres M Lozano; Donald Malone; Helen S Mayberg; Jonathan P Miller; Parag G Patil; DeLea Peichel; Erika A Petersen; Ali R Rezai; R Mark Richardson; Patricio Riva-Posse; Tejas Sankar; Jason M Schwalb; Helen Blair Simpson; Konstantin Slavin; Paul H Stypulkowski; Tor Tosteson; Peter Warnke; Jon T Willie; Kareem A Zaghloul; Joseph S Neimat; Nader Pouratian; Sameer A Sheth
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 10.154

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.