Literature DB >> 24973137

Young children bet on their numerical skills: metacognition in the numerical domain.

Vy A Vo1, Rosa Li1, Nate Kornell2, Alexandre Pouget3, Jessica F Cantlon4.   

Abstract

Metacognition, the ability to assess one's own knowledge, has been targeted as a critical learning mechanism in mathematics education. Yet the early childhood origins of metacognition have proven difficult to study. Using a novel nonverbal task and a comprehensive set of metacognitive measures, we provided the strongest evidence to date that young children are metacognitive. We showed that children as young as 5 years made metacognitive "bets" on their numerical discriminations in a wagering task. However, contrary to previous reports from adults, our results showed that children's metacognition is domain specific: Their metacognition in the numerical domain was unrelated to their metacognition in another domain (emotion discrimination). Moreover, children's metacognitive ability in only the numerical domain predicted their school-based mathematics knowledge. The data provide novel evidence that metacognition is a fundamental, domain-dependent cognitive ability in children. The findings have implications for theories of uncertainty and reveal new avenues for training metacognition in children.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  childhood development; cognition; cognitive development; mathematical ability; metacognition; number comprehension

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24973137      PMCID: PMC4217213          DOI: 10.1177/0956797614538458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  21 in total

1.  Type 2 tasks in the theory of signal detectability: discrimination between correct and incorrect decisions.

Authors:  Susan J Galvin; John V Podd; Vit Drga; John Whitmore
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

2.  The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation.

Authors:  David C Knill; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Jeffrey M Beck; Peter E Latham; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Sources of bias in the Goodman-Kruskal gamma coefficient measure of association: implications for studies of metacognitive processes.

Authors:  Michael E J Masson; Caren M Rotello
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Three-year-old children can access their own memory to guide responses on a visual matching task.

Authors:  Frances K Balcomb; LouAnn Gerken
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2008-09

6.  Inexpert calibration of comprehension.

Authors:  A M Glenberg; W Epstein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-01

7.  A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions.

Authors:  T O Nelson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 8.  Probabilistic brains: knowns and unknowns.

Authors:  Alexandre Pouget; Jeffrey M Beck; Wei Ji Ma; Peter E Latham
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Representation of confidence associated with a decision by neurons in the parietal cortex.

Authors:  Roozbeh Kiani; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  The neural basis of metacognitive ability.

Authors:  Stephen M Fleming; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  21 in total

1.  The Importance of Knowing When You Don't Remember: Neural Signaling of Retrieval Failure Predicts Memory Improvement Over Time.

Authors:  Yana Fandakova; Silvia A Bunge; Carter Wendelken; Peter Desautels; Lauren Hunter; Joshua K Lee; Simona Ghetti
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population.

Authors:  Mostafa Salari Rad; Alison Jane Martingano; Jeremy Ginges
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Metacognition across domains: Is the association between arithmetic and metacognitive monitoring domain-specific?

Authors:  Elien Bellon; Wim Fias; Bert De Smedt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Confidence and certainty: distinct probabilistic quantities for different goals.

Authors:  Alexandre Pouget; Jan Drugowitsch; Adam Kepecs
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Multisensory decisions provide support for probabilistic number representations.

Authors:  Ingmar Kanitscheider; Amanda Brown; Alexandre Pouget; Anne K Churchland
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Causal Evidence for Mnemonic Metacognition in Human Precuneus.

Authors:  Qun Ye; Futing Zou; Hakwan Lau; Yi Hu; Sze Chai Kwok
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Numerical error monitoring.

Authors:  Yalçın Akın Duyan; Fuat Balcı
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

8.  Carving Metacognition at Its Joints: Protracted Development of Component Processes.

Authors:  Allison P O'Leary; Vladimir M Sloutsky
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2016-10-19

9.  Changing the precision of preschoolers' approximate number system representations changes their symbolic math performance.

Authors:  Jinjing Jenny Wang; Darko Odic; Justin Halberda; Lisa Feigenson
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2016-04-08

10.  Spontaneous Metacognition in Rhesus Monkeys.

Authors:  Alexandra G Rosati; Laurie R Santos
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.