Literature DB >> 24972377

Direct parametric reconstruction from undersampled (k, t)-space data in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.

Nikolaos Dikaios1, Simon Arridge2, Valentin Hamy3, Shonit Punwani3, David Atkinson3.   

Abstract

The Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) signal can be made sensitive to functional parameters that provide information about tissues. In dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI these functional parameters are related to the microvasculature environment and the concentration changes that occur rapidly after the injection of a contrast agent. Typically DCE images are reconstructed individually and kinetic parameters are estimated by fitting a pharmacokinetic model to the time-enhancement response; these methods can be denoted as "indirect". If undersampling is present to accelerate the acquisition, techniques such as kt-FOCUSS can be employed in the reconstruction step to avoid image degradation. This paper suggests a Bayesian inference framework to estimate functional parameters directly from the measurements at high temporal resolution. The current implementation estimates pharmacokinetic parameters (related to the extended Tofts model) from undersampled (k, t)-space DCE MRI. The proposed scheme is evaluated on a simulated abdominal DCE phantom and prostate DCE data, for fully sampled, 4 and 8-fold undersampled (k, t)-space data. Direct kinetic parameters demonstrate better correspondence (up to 70% higher mutual information) to the ground truth kinetic parameters (of the simulated abdominal DCE phantom) than the ones derived from the indirect methods. For the prostate DCE data, direct kinetic parameters depict the morphology of the tumour better. To examine the impact on cancer diagnosis, a peripheral zone prostate cancer diagnostic model was employed to calculate a probability map for each method.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian compressed sensing; Direct reconstruction; Dynamic contrast enhanced

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24972377     DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2014.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  12 in total

1.  Direct estimation of tracer-kinetic parameter maps from highly undersampled brain dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Yi Guo; Sajan Goud Lingala; Yinghua Zhu; R Marc Lebel; Krishna S Nayak
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Inferring CT perfusion parameters and uncertainties using a Bayesian approach.

Authors:  Tao Sun; Roger Fulton; Zhanli Hu; Christina Sutiono; Dong Liang; Hairong Zheng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-01

3.  Maximum Entropy Technique and Regularization Functional for Determining the Pharmacokinetic Parameters in DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Zahra Amini Farsani; Volker J Schmid
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.903

4.  Joint arterial input function and tracer kinetic parameter estimation from undersampled dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using a model consistency constraint.

Authors:  Yi Guo; Sajan Goud Lingala; Yannick Bliesener; R Marc Lebel; Yinghua Zhu; Krishna S Nayak
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Spatio-Temporally Constrained Reconstruction for Hyperpolarized Carbon-13 MRI Using Kinetic Models.

Authors:  John Maidens; Jeremy W Gordon; Hsin-Yu Chen; Ilwoo Park; Mark Van Criekinge; Eugene Milshteyn; Robert Bok; Rahul Aggarwal; Marcus Ferrone; James B Slater; John Kurhanewicz; Daniel B Vigneron; Murat Arcak; Peder E Z Larson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Efficient DCE-MRI Parameter and Uncertainty Estimation Using a Neural Network.

Authors:  Yannick Bliesener; Jay Acharya; Krishna S Nayak
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Pseudo Test-Retest Evaluation of Millimeter-Resolution Whole-Brain Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI in Patients with High-Grade Glioma.

Authors:  Yannick Bliesener; R Marc Lebel; Jay Acharya; Richard Frayne; Krishna S Nayak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 29.146

8.  An Anthropomorphic Digital Reference Object (DRO) for Simulation and Analysis of Breast DCE MRI Techniques.

Authors:  Leah Henze Bancroft; James Holmes; Ryan Bosca-Harasim; Jacob Johnson; Pingni Wang; Frank Korosec; Walter Block; Roberta Strigel
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-04-02

9.  Robust estimation of hemo-dynamic parameters in traditional DCE-MRI models.

Authors:  Mikkel B Hansen; Anna Tietze; Søren Haack; Jesper Kallehauge; Irene K Mikkelsen; Leif Østergaard; Kim Mouridsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Motion correction of free-breathing magnetic resonance renography using model-driven registration.

Authors:  Dimitra Flouri; Daniel Lesnic; Constantina Chrysochou; Jehill Parikh; Peter Thelwall; Neil Sheerin; Philip A Kalra; David L Buckley; Steven P Sourbron
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.