Literature DB >> 24970951

Questions for Surveys: Current Trends and Future Directions.

Nora Cate Schaeffer1, Jennifer Dykema1.   

Abstract

We begin with a look back at the field to identify themes of recent research that we expect to continue to occupy researchers in the future. As part of this overview, we characterize the themes and topics examined in research about measurement and survey questions published in Public Opinion Quarterly in the past decade. We then characterize the field more broadly by highlighting topics that we expect to continue or to grow in importance, including the relationship between survey questions and the total survey error perspective, cognitive versus interactional approaches, interviewing practices, mode and technology, visual aspects of question design, and culture. Considering avenues for future research, we advocate for a decision-oriented framework for thinking about survey questions and their characteristics. The approach we propose distinguishes among various aspects of question characteristics, including question topic, question type and response dimension, conceptualization and operationalization of the target object, question structure, question form, response categories, question implementation, and question wording. Thinking about question characteristics more systematically would allow study designs to take into account relationships among these characteristics and identify gaps in current knowledge.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 24970951      PMCID: PMC4071995          DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfr048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Opin Q        ISSN: 0033-362X


  24 in total

1.  Telescoping of landmark events: implications for survey research.

Authors:  G D Gaskell; D B Wright; C A O'Muircheartaigh
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

2.  Context effects in national health surveys: effects of preceding questions on reporting serious difficulty seeing and legal blindness.

Authors:  A Todorov
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

3.  The measurement of personal values in survey research: a test of alternative rating procedures.

Authors:  J A McCarty; L J Shrum
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

4.  How unclear terms affect survey data.

Authors:  F J Fowler
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  1992

5.  Probabilistic Polling And Voting In The 2008 Presidential Election: Evidence From The American Life Panel.

Authors:  Adeline Delavande; Charles F Manski
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2010

6.  Cultural variability in the effects of question design features on respondent comprehension of health surveys.

Authors:  Timothy P Johnson; Young Ik Cho; Allyson L Holbrook; Diane O'Rourke; Richard B Warnecke; Noel Chavez
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 3.797

7.  ADOLESCENTS' INCONSISTENCY IN SELF-REPORTED SMOKING: A COMPARISON OF REPORTS IN SCHOOL AND IN HOUSEHOLD SETTINGS.

Authors:  Pamela C Griesler; Denise B Kandel; Christine Schaffran; Mei-Chen Hu; Mark Davies
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2008

8.  Introduction to the special issue on the scientific assessment of biomeasures in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics.

Authors:  Narayan Sastry; Katherine McGonagle; Robert F Schoeni
Journal:  Biodemography Soc Biol       Date:  2009

9.  Using Nonmedically Trained Interviewers to Collect Biomeasures in a National In-Home Survey.

Authors:  Angela Jaszczak; Katie Lundeen; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Field methods       Date:  2009-02

10.  Eye-Tracking Data: New Insights on Response Order Effects and Other Cognitive Shortcuts in Survey Responding.

Authors:  Mirta Galesic; Roger Tourangeau; Mick P Couper; Frederick G Conrad
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2008-12-12
View more
  19 in total

1.  Completing Self-Administered Questionnaires: Hmong Older Adults and Their Family Helpers.

Authors:  Maichou Lor; Nora Cate Schaeffer; Roger Brown; Barbara J Bowers
Journal:  Field methods       Date:  2019-12-23

2.  Interviewing Practices, Conversational Practices, and Rapport: Responsiveness and Engagement in the Standardized Survey Interview.

Authors:  Dana Garbarski; Nora Cate Schaeffer; Jennifer Dykema
Journal:  Sociol Methodol       Date:  2016-09-20

3.  Optimizing Count Responses in Surveys: A Machine-learning Approach.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Xin Guo; Kenneth C Land
Journal:  Sociol Methods Res       Date:  2018-01-30

4.  Interaction Before and During the Survey Interview: Insights from Conversation Analysis.

Authors:  Nora Cate Schaeffer
Journal:  Int J Soc Res Methodol       Date:  2020-09-29

5.  Sonographer Skill Teaching Practices Survey: Development and initial validation of a survey instrument.

Authors:  Delwyn Nicholls; Linda Sweet; Pawel Skuza; Amanda Muller; Jon Hyett
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2016-05-11

6.  Ascertaining Subjective Cognitive Decline: A Comparison of Approaches and Evidence for Using an Age-Anchored Reference Group.

Authors:  Caroline Tandetnik; Meagan T Farrell; Mark S Cary; Sarah Cines; Sheina Emrani; Jason Karlawish; Stephanie Cosentino
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.472

7.  Phase 1 healthy volunteer willingness to participate and enrollment preferences.

Authors:  Stephanie C Chen; Ninet Sinaii; Gabriella Bedarida; Mark A Gregorio; Ezekiel Emanuel; Christine Grady
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 8.  Towards a reconsideration of the use of agree-disagree questions in measuring subjective evaluations.

Authors:  Jennifer Dykema; Nora Cate Schaeffer; Dana Garbarski; Nadia Assad; Steven Blixt
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2021-06-24

9.  Implementation of Audio-Computer Assisted Self-Interview (ACASI) among adolescent girls in humanitarian settings: feasibility, acceptability, and lessons learned.

Authors:  Kathryn Falb; Sophie Tanner; Khudejha Asghar; Samir Souidi; Stan Mierzwa; Asham Assazenew; Theresita Bakomere; Pamela Mallinga; Katie Robinette; Woinishet Tibebu; Lindsay Stark
Journal:  Confl Health       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.723

10.  Likelihood of COVID-19 vaccination by subgroups across the US: post-election trends and disparities.

Authors:  Peter G Szilagyi; Kyla Thomas; Megha D Shah; Nathalie Vizueta; Yan Cui; Sitaram Vangala; Arie Kapteyn
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.