Literature DB >> 21253437

Eye-Tracking Data: New Insights on Response Order Effects and Other Cognitive Shortcuts in Survey Responding.

Mirta Galesic, Roger Tourangeau, Mick P Couper, Frederick G Conrad.   

Abstract

Survey researchers since Cannell have worried that respondents may take various shortcuts to reduce the effort needed to complete a survey. The evidence for such shortcuts is often indirect. For instance, preferences for earlier versus later response options have been interpreted as evidence that respondents do not read beyond the first few options. This is really only a hypothesis, however, that is not supported by direct evidence regarding the allocation of respondent attention. In the current study, we used a new method to more directly observe what respondents do and do not look at by recording their eye movements while they answered questions in a Web survey. The eye-tracking data indicate that respondents do in fact spend more time looking at the first few options in a list of response options than those at the end of the list; this helps explain their tendency to select the options presented first regardless of their content. In addition, the eye-tracking data reveal that respondents are reluctant to invest effort in reading definitions of survey concepts that are only a mouse click away or paying attention to initially hidden response options. It is clear from the eye-tracking data that some respondents are more prone to these and other cognitive shortcuts than others, providing relatively direct evidence for what had been suspected based on more conventional measures.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21253437      PMCID: PMC3022327          DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfn059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Opin Q        ISSN: 0033-362X


  8 in total

1.  The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living.

Authors:  M Land; N Mennie; J Rusted
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Clarifying question meaning in a household telephone survey.

Authors:  F G Conrad; M F Schober
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

Review 3.  In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities?

Authors:  M F Land; M Hayhoe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Integrating text and pictorial information: eye movements when looking at print advertisements.

Authors:  K Rayner; C M Rotello; A J Stewart; J Keir; S A Duffy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2001-09

5.  Visual search for traffic signs: the effects of clutter, luminance, and aging.

Authors:  G Ho; C T Scialfa; J K Caird; T Graw
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  Survey research.

Authors:  J A Krosnick
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 7.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.

Authors:  K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 8.934

  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  Improving reverse correlation analysis of faces: Diagnostics of order effects, runs, rater agreement, and image pairs.

Authors:  Michael Kevane; Birgit Koopmann-Holm
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-01-06

2.  Increasing Respondents' Use of Definitions in Web Surveys.

Authors:  Andy Peytchev; Frederick G Conrad; Mick P Couper; Roger Tourangeau
Journal:  J Off Stat       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 0.920

3.  Questions for Surveys: Current Trends and Future Directions.

Authors:  Nora Cate Schaeffer; Jennifer Dykema
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2011-12

4.  Assessing self-reported use of new psychoactive substances: The impact of gate questions.

Authors:  Joseph J Palamar; Patricia Acosta; Fermín Fernández Calderón; Scott Sherman; Charles M Cleland
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.829

5.  Choices Matter: How Response Options for Survey Questions about Sexual Identity Affect Population Estimates of Its Association with Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drug Use.

Authors:  Brady T West; Sean Esteban McCabe
Journal:  Field methods       Date:  2021-03-22

6.  I Need a CAVAA: How Conversational Agent Voting Advice Applications (CAVAAs) Affect Users' Political Knowledge and Tool Experience.

Authors:  Naomi Kamoen; Christine Liebrecht
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2022-05-12

7.  A comparative assessment of two tools designed to support patient safety culture in UK general practice.

Authors:  Ian Litchfield; Kate Marsden; Lucy Doos; Katherine Perryman; Anthony Avery; Sheila Greenfield
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  A new perspective on how humans assess their surroundings; derivation of head orientation and its role in 'framing' the environment.

Authors:  Gwendoline Ixia Wilson; Mark D Holton; James Walker; Mark W Jones; Ed Grundy; Ian M Davies; David Clarke; Adrian Luckman; Nick Russill; Vianney Wilson; Rosie Plummer; Rory P Wilson
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Will the last be first and the first last? The role of classroom registers in cognitive skill acquisition.

Authors:  Francesca Borgonovi; Maciej Jakubowski; Artur Pokropek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  [Quality assurance follow-up survey of the ELISA cohort study on COVID-19 prevalence: The view of study participants - What is well received?]

Authors:  Elke Peters; Aiham Alabid; Susanne Elsner; Christine Klein; Max Borsche; Jan Rupp; Alexander Katalinic
Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes       Date:  2022-08-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.