Literature DB >> 10119848

How unclear terms affect survey data.

F J Fowler1.   

Abstract

Although writing clear questions is accepted as a general goal in surveys, procedures to ensure that each key term is consistently understood are not routine. Researchers who do not adequately test respondent understanding of questions must assume that ambiguity will not have a large or systematic effect on their results. Seven questions that were drawn from questions used in national health surveys were subjected to special pretest procedures and found to contain one or more poorly defined terms. When the questions were revised to clarify the definition of key terms, significantly different estimates resulted. The implication is that unclear terms are likely to produce biased estimates. The results indicate that evaluation of survey questions to identify key terms that are not consistently understood and defining unclear terms are ways to reduce systematic error in survey measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 10119848     DOI: 10.1086/269312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Opin Q        ISSN: 0033-362X


  15 in total

1.  How much do we count? Interpretation and error-making in the decennial census.

Authors:  R R Iversen; F F Furstenberg; A A Belzer
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1999-02

2.  Role of cognitive testing in the development of the CAHPS Hospital Survey.

Authors:  Roger E Levine; Floyd J Fowler; Julie A Brown
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Surveying free and low-cost survey software.

Authors:  Olivia Carter-Pokras; Leah McClellan; Ruth E Zambrana
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 4.  Understanding and improving the validity of self-report of parenting.

Authors:  Sarah K Morsbach; Ronald J Prinz
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-03

5.  Questions for Surveys: Current Trends and Future Directions.

Authors:  Nora Cate Schaeffer; Jennifer Dykema
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2011-12

6.  On the Relationship Between Item Stem Formulation and Criterion Validity of Multiple-Component Measuring Instruments.

Authors:  Natalja Menold; Tenko Raykov
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.821

7.  An Examination of Resident Perspectives on Survey Participation and Methodology: Implications for Educational Practice and Research.

Authors:  Colleen Y Colbert; Andrei Brateanu; Amy S Nowacki; Allison Prelosky-Leeson; Judith C French
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-06-14

8.  What can we learn about postnatal care in Ghana if we ask the right questions? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Zelee Hill; Eunice Okyere; Mary Wickenden; Charlotte Tawiah-Agyemang
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 2.640

9.  Investigating the Role of Assessment Method on Reports of Déjà Vu and Tip-of-the-Tongue States during Standard Recognition Tests.

Authors:  Radka Jersakova; Chris J A Moulin; Akira R O'Connor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Testing the implementation of an electronic process-of-care checklist for use during morning medical rounds in a tertiary intensive care unit: a prospective before-after study.

Authors:  Karena M Conroy; Doug Elliott; Anthony R Burrell
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 6.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.