Literature DB >> 24969339

Immediate changes in intraocular pressure after clear corneal micro-incision versus small-incision cataract surgery.

Ken Hayashi1, Motoaki Yoshida, Koichi Yoshimura.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We sought to examine changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) in the immediate period after clear corneal micro-incision cataract surgery (MICS) and after small-incision cataract surgery (SICS).
METHODS: Sixty-eight eyes of 34 patients scheduled for coaxial phacoemulsification were randomized into one of two groups: (a) eyes that were to undergo a 2.0-mm MICS, and (b) a 2.65-mm SICS. At the conclusion of surgery, the IOP was adjusted to the range between 15-40 mmHg with stromal hydration. The IOP was measured using a rebound tonometer preoperatively, at the conclusion of surgery, and at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 min postoperatively. The Seidel test and anterior segment-optical coherence tomography were performed at 20 min postoperatively.
RESULTS: Mean IOP at the conclusion of surgery was 27.7 ± 4.7 mmHg in the MICS group and 29.7 ± 5.1 mmHg in the SICS group (p = 0.1239). In both groups, mean IOP decreased to the preoperative level within 9 min postoperatively and did not change significantly for up to 15 min. Mean IOP was similar between the MICS and SICS groups throughout the observation period (p ≥ 0.1239). Hypotony (≤10 mmHg), positive Seidel test, and loss of wound coaptation were not detected in all eyes.
CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting the IOP to a relatively high level at the conclusion of surgery, the IOP decreased within 9 min and was stable within 15 min without hypotony. The IOP was comparable between eyes after MICS and SICS, and both incisions virtually closed within 20 min postoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24969339     DOI: 10.1007/s10384-014-0331-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0021-5155            Impact factor:   2.447


  31 in total

1.  Evaluation of intraocular pressure in the immediate period after phacoemulsification.

Authors:  B J Shingleton; R A Wadhwani; M W O'Donoghue; S Baylus; H Hoey
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Validity and limits of the rebound tonometer (ICare®): clinical study.

Authors:  Gian Luca Scuderi; Nikhil Carlo Cascone; Federico Regine; Andrea Perdicchi; Angelica Cerulli; Santi Maria Recupero
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.597

3.  Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.

Authors:  Makoto Nakamura; Urtogtah Darhad; Yasuko Tatsumi; Miyuki Fujioka; Azusa Kusuhara; Hidetaka Maeda; Akira Negi
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Corneal wound architecture and integrity after phacoemulsification evaluation of coaxial, microincision coaxial, and microincision bimanual techniques.

Authors:  John P Berdahl; John J DeStafeno; Terry Kim
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Clear corneal incision architecture in the immediate postoperative period evaluated using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Daniel Calladine; Richard Packard
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Long-term intraocular pressure changes after combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and vitrectomy.

Authors:  Yuya Ki-I; Takehiro Yamashita; Akinori Uemura; Taiji Sakamoto
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision clear cornea cataract surgery.

Authors:  Sabine Kurz; Frank Krummenauer; Pia Gabriel; N Pfeiffer; H Burkhard Dick
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Paolo Brusini; Maria Letizia Salvetat; Marco Zeppieri; Claudia Tosoni; Lucia Parisi
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Inflow of ocular surface fluid into the anterior chamber after phacoemulsification through sutureless corneal cataract wounds.

Authors:  Samantha Herretes; Walter J Stark; Ashkan Pirouzmanesh; Johann M G Reyes; Peter J McDonnell; Ashley Behrens
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Effect of high pressurization versus normal pressurization on changes in intraocular pressure immediately after clear corneal cataract surgery.

Authors:  Ken Hayashi; Motoaki Yoshida; Shin-Ichi Manabe; Koichi Yoshimura
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.351

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Different-sized incisions for phacoemulsification in age-related cataract.

Authors:  Chongfei Jin; Xinyi Chen; Andrew Law; Yunhee Kang; Xue Wang; Wen Xu; Ke Yao
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-09-20

2.  Binocular visual function of myopic pseudophakic monovision.

Authors:  Ken Hayashi; Motoaki Yoshida; Hiroshi Sasaki; Akira Hirata
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Coaxial Microincision Cataract Surgery versus Standard Coaxial Small-Incision Cataract Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Xingchao Shentu; Xin Zhang; Xiajing Tang; Xiaoning Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.