Literature DB >> 16850245

The decision-making experience among women diagnosed with stage I and II breast cancer.

Brenda Sabo1, Nathalie St-Jacques, Daniel Rayson.   

Abstract

A cancer diagnosis signals entry for many patients into the complex and often bewildering world of cancer care. Understanding the role women prefer and their level of satisfaction with the decision-making process at time of diagnosis will help to inform healthcare professionals how to better support breast cancer patients as they navigate the cancer journey. Logistic regression was used to identify significant factors influencing outcomes in role preferences and satisfaction. A complementary method, principal components analysis was used to explore patterns of co-association between outcomes and their influencing factors. Results showed women tended to adopt cancer decision-making roles similar to those used for general health decision-making. Overall, women preferred a collaborative/active role (40/38%) over a passive role (16%). Satisfaction rates were high with 88.1% of women being satisfied/very satisfied with their cancer treatment choice; 89.7% of women satisfied with their decision-making role and; 83.6% satisfied with the information provided to support their decision. Further research involving cohorts of women diagnosed with more advanced disease and for whom decisional regret may be greater, is needed to further explore the link between preferred decision-making role and satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16850245     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-006-9309-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  5 in total

1.  Preferences for decision-making about contraception and general health care among reproductive age women at an abortion clinic.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Justin Diedrich; Eleanor Drey; Ariel Postone; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-07-21

2.  Older adults newly diagnosed with symptomatic myeloma and treatment decision making.

Authors:  Joseph D Tariman; Ardith Doorenbos; Karen G Schepp; Seema Singhal; Donna L Berry
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  A survey of breast cancer physicians regarding patient involvement in breast cancer treatment decisions.

Authors:  Grace Clarke Hillyer; Dawn L Hershman; Lawrence H Kushi; Lois Lamerato; Christine B Ambrosone; Dana H Bovbjerg; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Sargam Rana; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 4.  The patient experience.

Authors:  Nadia Harbeck; Renate Haidinger
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Partnering with families to promote nutrition in cancer care: feasibility and acceptability of the PIcNIC intervention.

Authors:  Alex Molassiotis; Shelley Roberts; Hui Lin Cheng; Henry K F To; Po Shan Ko; Wang Lam; Yuk Fong Lam; Jessica Abbott; Deborah Kiefer; Jasotha Sanmugarajah; Andrea P Marshall
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.234

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.