Joseph Putila1, Nancy Lan Guo1. 1. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States of America.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of a patient's risk of recurrence and treatment response is an important prerequisite of personalized therapy in lung cancer. This study extends a previously described non-small cell lung cancer prognostic model by the addition of chemotherapy and co-morbidities through the use of linked SEER-Medicare data. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Data on 34,203 lung adenocarcinoma and 26,967 squamous cell lung carcinoma patients were used to determine the contribution of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) to prognostication in 30 treatment combinations. A Cox model including COPD was estimated on 1,000 bootstrap samples, with the resulting model assessed on ROC, Brier Score, Harrell's C, and Nagelkerke's R2 metrics in order to evaluate improvements in prognostication over a model without COPD. The addition of COPD to the model incorporating cancer stage, age, gender, race, and tumor grade was shown to improve prognostication in multiple patient groups. For lung adenocarcinoma patients, there was an improvement on the prognostication in the overall patient population and in patients without receiving chemotherapy, including those receiving surgery only. For squamous cell carcinoma, an improvement on prognostication was seen in both the overall patient population and in patients receiving multiple types of chemotherapy. COPD condition was able to stratify patients receiving the same treatments into significantly (log-rank p<0.05) different prognostic groups, independent of cancer stage. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Combining patient information on COPD, cancer stage, age, gender, race, and tumor grade could improve prognostication and prediction of treatment response in individual non-small cell lung cancer patients. This model enables refined prognosis and estimation of clinical outcome of comprehensive treatment regimens, providing a useful tool for personalized clinical decision-making.
BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of a patient's risk of recurrence and treatment response is an important prerequisite of personalized therapy in lung cancer. This study extends a previously described non-small cell lung cancer prognostic model by the addition of chemotherapy and co-morbidities through the use of linked SEER-Medicare data. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Data on 34,203 lung adenocarcinoma and 26,967 squamous cell lung carcinomapatients were used to determine the contribution of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) to prognostication in 30 treatment combinations. A Cox model including COPD was estimated on 1,000 bootstrap samples, with the resulting model assessed on ROC, Brier Score, Harrell's C, and Nagelkerke's R2 metrics in order to evaluate improvements in prognostication over a model without COPD. The addition of COPD to the model incorporating cancer stage, age, gender, race, and tumor grade was shown to improve prognostication in multiple patient groups. For lung adenocarcinomapatients, there was an improvement on the prognostication in the overall patient population and in patients without receiving chemotherapy, including those receiving surgery only. For squamous cell carcinoma, an improvement on prognostication was seen in both the overall patient population and in patients receiving multiple types of chemotherapy. COPD condition was able to stratify patients receiving the same treatments into significantly (log-rank p<0.05) different prognostic groups, independent of cancer stage. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Combining patient information on COPD, cancer stage, age, gender, race, and tumor grade could improve prognostication and prediction of treatment response in individual non-small cell lung cancerpatients. This model enables refined prognosis and estimation of clinical outcome of comprehensive treatment regimens, providing a useful tool for personalized clinical decision-making.
Authors: E W Steyerberg; F E Harrell; G J Borsboom; M J Eijkemans; Y Vergouwe; J D Habbema Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: M L G Janssen-Heijnen; S Smulders; V E P P Lemmens; F W J M Smeenk; H J A A van Geffen; J W W Coebergh Journal: Thorax Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Jie Lin; Corey A Carter; Katherine A McGlynn; Shelia H Zahm; Joel A Nations; William F Anderson; Craig D Shriver; Kangmin Zhu Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Alyson L Mahar; Carolyn Compton; Lisa M McShane; Susan Halabi; Hisao Asamura; Ramon Rami-Porta; Patti A Groome Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Sunmi Ju; Hyang Rae Lee; Ju-Young Kim; Ho Cheol Kim; Gyeong-Won Lee; Jung Wan You; Yu Ji Cho; Yi Yeong Jeong; Jong Deog Lee; Seung Jun Lee Journal: Thorac Cancer Date: 2018-08-14 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Mihong Choi; Heung Tae Kim; Ji-Youn Han; Geon Kook Lee; Soo-Hyun Lee; Kun Young Lim; Jungnam Joo; Hye Jin Won; Jin Soo Lee; Youngjoo Lee Journal: Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 4.679