Literature DB >> 24967586

Combining COPD with clinical, pathological and demographic information refines prognosis and treatment response prediction of non-small cell lung cancer.

Joseph Putila1, Nancy Lan Guo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of a patient's risk of recurrence and treatment response is an important prerequisite of personalized therapy in lung cancer. This study extends a previously described non-small cell lung cancer prognostic model by the addition of chemotherapy and co-morbidities through the use of linked SEER-Medicare data. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Data on 34,203 lung adenocarcinoma and 26,967 squamous cell lung carcinoma patients were used to determine the contribution of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) to prognostication in 30 treatment combinations. A Cox model including COPD was estimated on 1,000 bootstrap samples, with the resulting model assessed on ROC, Brier Score, Harrell's C, and Nagelkerke's R2 metrics in order to evaluate improvements in prognostication over a model without COPD. The addition of COPD to the model incorporating cancer stage, age, gender, race, and tumor grade was shown to improve prognostication in multiple patient groups. For lung adenocarcinoma patients, there was an improvement on the prognostication in the overall patient population and in patients without receiving chemotherapy, including those receiving surgery only. For squamous cell carcinoma, an improvement on prognostication was seen in both the overall patient population and in patients receiving multiple types of chemotherapy. COPD condition was able to stratify patients receiving the same treatments into significantly (log-rank p<0.05) different prognostic groups, independent of cancer stage. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Combining patient information on COPD, cancer stage, age, gender, race, and tumor grade could improve prognostication and prediction of treatment response in individual non-small cell lung cancer patients. This model enables refined prognosis and estimation of clinical outcome of comprehensive treatment regimens, providing a useful tool for personalized clinical decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24967586      PMCID: PMC4072724          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  39 in total

1.  Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis.

Authors:  E W Steyerberg; F E Harrell; G J Borsboom; M J Eijkemans; Y Vergouwe; J D Habbema
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population.

Authors:  Joan L Warren; Carrie N Klabunde; Deborah Schrag; Peter B Bach; Gerald F Riley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Smoking and lung cancer survival: the role of comorbidity and treatment.

Authors:  C Martin Tammemagi; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Michael Simoff; Paul Kvale
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 4.  A systematic overview of chemotherapy effects in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  S Sörenson; B Glimelius; P Nygren
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 5.  Lung cancer.

Authors:  P C Hoffman; A M Mauer; E E Vokes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-02-05       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Factors predicting radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Tiziana Rancati; Giovanni Luca Ceresoli; Giovanna Gagliardi; Stefano Schipani; Giovanni Mauro Cattaneo
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Effect of comorbidity on the treatment and prognosis of elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M L G Janssen-Heijnen; S Smulders; V E P P Lemmens; F W J M Smeenk; H J A A van Geffen; J W W Coebergh
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  Impact of comorbidity on lung cancer survival.

Authors:  C Martin Tammemagi; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Michael Simoff; Paul Kvale
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 9.  Single-agent versus combination chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and performance status 2: a literature-based meta-analysis of randomized studies.

Authors:  Charlott Mörth; Antonis Valachis
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.705

10.  Health insurance and spending among cancer patients.

Authors:  Kenneth E Thorpe; David Howard
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2003 Jan-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

View more
  10 in total

1.  A Prognostic Model to Predict Mortality among Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients in the U.S. Military Health System.

Authors:  Jie Lin; Corey A Carter; Katherine A McGlynn; Shelia H Zahm; Joel A Nations; William F Anderson; Craig D Shriver; Kangmin Zhu
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 15.609

2.  Refining Prognosis in Lung Cancer: A Report on the Quality and Relevance of Clinical Prognostic Tools.

Authors:  Alyson L Mahar; Carolyn Compton; Lisa M McShane; Susan Halabi; Hisao Asamura; Ramon Rami-Porta; Patti A Groome
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 15.609

3.  Epidermal growth factor receptor derived peptide vaccination to prevent lung adenocarcinoma formation: An in vivo study in a murine model of EGFR mutant lung cancer.

Authors:  Johnathan D Ebben; Ronald A Lubet; Ekram Gad; Mary L Disis; Ming You
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 4.784

4.  A lower level of forced expiratory volume in one second predicts the poor prognosis of small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hye Seon Kang; Ah Young Shin; Chang Dong Yeo; Ju Sang Kim; Yong Hyun Kim; Jin Woo Kim; Sang Haak Lee
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Cardiopulmonary exercise testing screening and pre-operative pulmonary rehabilitation reduce postoperative complications and improve fast-track recovery after lung cancer surgery: A study for 342 cases.

Authors:  Ke Gao; Peng-Ming Yu; Jian-Hua Su; Cheng-Qi He; Lun-Xu Liu; Yu-Bin Zhou; Qiang Pu; Guo-Wei Che
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Continuous infusion of high-dose ulinastatin during surgery does not improve early postoperative clinical outcomes in patients undergoing radical lung cancer surgery: A pilot study.

Authors:  Leng Zhou; Haidan Lan; Qinghua Zhou; Xiao Jun Tang; Daxing Zhu; Jianming Yue; Bin Liu
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 7.  Lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: From a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Jie Dai; Ping Yang; Angela Cox; Gening Jiang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-03-14

8.  Development and validation of nomograms for predicting survival probability of patients with advanced adenocarcinoma in different EGFR mutation status.

Authors:  Hsi-Chieh Chen; Elise Chia-Hui Tan; Chih-Hsien Liao; Zhong-Zhe Lin; Ming-Chin Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Impact of coexistent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on the survival of patients with small cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy.

Authors:  Sunmi Ju; Hyang Rae Lee; Ju-Young Kim; Ho Cheol Kim; Gyeong-Won Lee; Jung Wan You; Yu Ji Cho; Yi Yeong Jeong; Jong Deog Lee; Seung Jun Lee
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Phase II Study of Pemetrexed as a Salvage Chemotherapy for Thymidylate Synthase-Low Squamous Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Mihong Choi; Heung Tae Kim; Ji-Youn Han; Geon Kook Lee; Soo-Hyun Lee; Kun Young Lim; Jungnam Joo; Hye Jin Won; Jin Soo Lee; Youngjoo Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.679

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.