Literature DB >> 24966609

Radiologic evaluation of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Seung Soo Lee1, Seong Ho Park1.   

Abstract

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a frequent cause of chronic liver diseases, ranging from simple steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-related liver cirrhosis. Although liver biopsy is still the gold standard for the diagnosis of NAFLD, especially for the diagnosis of NASH, imaging methods have been increasingly accepted as noninvasive alternatives to liver biopsy. Ultrasonography is a well-established and cost-effective imaging technique for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis, especially for screening a large population at risk of NAFLD. Ultrasonography has a reasonable accuracy in detecting moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis although it is less accurate for detecting mild hepatic steatosis, operator-dependent, and rather qualitative. Computed tomography is not appropriate for general population assessment of hepatic steatosis given its inaccuracy in detecting mild hepatic steatosis and potential radiation hazard. However, computed tomography may be effective in specific clinical situations, such as evaluation of donor candidates for hepatic transplantation. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging are now regarded as the most accurate practical methods of measuring liver fat in clinical practice, especially for longitudinal follow-up of patients with NAFLD. Ultrasound elastography and magnetic resonance elastography are increasingly used to evaluate the degree of liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD and to differentiate NASH from simple steatosis. This article will review current imaging methods used to evaluate hepatic steatosis, including the diagnostic accuracy, limitations, and practical applicability of each method. It will also briefly describe the potential role of elastography techniques in the evaluation of patients with NAFLD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Elastography; Liver steatosis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic resonance spectroscopy; Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; Ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24966609      PMCID: PMC4064084          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i23.7392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  82 in total

1.  What has the optimistic bias got to do with the need to differentiate fatty liver from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis?

Authors:  Giovanni Tarantino
Journal:  J Gastrointestin Liver Dis       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.008

Review 2.  What about non-alcoholic fatty liver disease as a new criterion to define metabolic syndrome?

Authors:  Giovanni Tarantino; Carmine Finelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Liver elasticity in NASH patients evaluated with real-time elastography (RTE).

Authors:  Antonio Orlacchio; Francesca Bolacchi; Marco Antonicoli; Irene Coco; Elisa Costanzo; Daniela Tosti; Simona Francioso; Mario Angelico; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Reproducibility of MRI-determined proton density fat fraction across two different MR scanner platforms.

Authors:  Geraldine H Kang; Irene Cruite; Masoud Shiehmorteza; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony C Gamst; Gavin Hamilton; Mark Bydder; Michael S Middleton; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Noninvasive evaluation of hepatic fibrosis using acoustic radiation force-based shear stiffness in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Mark L Palmeri; Michael H Wang; Ned C Rouze; Manal F Abdelmalek; Cynthia D Guy; Barry Moser; Anna Mae Diehl; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 25.083

6.  The value of pre-operative magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the assessment of steatohepatitis in patients with colorectal liver metastasis.

Authors:  Jozef Urdzik; Tomas Bjerner; Alkwin Wanders; Jan Weis; Frans Duraj; Ulf Haglund; Agneta Norén
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2011-10-23       Impact factor: 25.083

7.  Quantification of hepatic steatosis with dual-energy computed tomography: comparison with tissue reference standards and quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in the ob/ob mouse.

Authors:  Nathan S Artz; Catherine D G Hines; Stephen T Brunner; Rashmi M Agni; Jens-Peter Kühn; Alejandro Roldan-Alzate; Guang-Hong Chen; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  T1 independent, T2* corrected MRI with accurate spectral modeling for quantification of fat: validation in a fat-water-SPIO phantom.

Authors:  Catherine D G Hines; Huanzhou Yu; Ann Shimakawa; Charles A McKenzie; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Measurement of hepatic lipid: high-speed T2-corrected multiecho acquisition at 1H MR spectroscopy--a rapid and accurate technique.

Authors:  Nashiely Pineda; Puneet Sharma; Qin Xu; Xiaoping Hu; Miriam Vos; Diego R Martin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Fatty liver disease in severe obese patients: diagnostic value of abdominal ultrasound.

Authors:  Alessandro de Moura Almeida; Helma Pinchemel Cotrim; Daniel Batista Valente Barbosa; Luciana Gordilho Matteoni de Athayde; Adimeia Souza Santos; Almir Galvão Vieira Bitencourt; Luiz Antonio Rodrigues de Freitas; Adriano Rios; Erivaldo Alves
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  113 in total

1.  Hepatic fat quantification magnetic resonance for monitoring treatment response in pediatric nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

Authors:  Hong Koh; Seung Kim; Myung-Joon Kim; Hyun Gi Kim; Hyun Joo Shin; Mi-Jung Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  CT indices for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis using non-enhanced CT images: development and validation of diagnostic cut-off values in a large cohort with pathological reference standard.

Authors:  Jieun Byun; Seung Soo Lee; Yu Sub Sung; Youngbin Shin; Jessica Yun; Ho Sung Kim; Eun Sil Yu; Sung-Gyu Lee; Moon-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Serum ferritin as a biomarker for NAFLD: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Raj A Shah; Kris V Kowdley
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 6.047

4.  Accurate Identification of Fatty Liver Disease in Data Warehouse Utilizing Natural Language Processing.

Authors:  Joseph S Redman; Yamini Natarajan; Jason K Hou; Jingqi Wang; Muzammil Hanif; Hua Feng; Jennifer R Kramer; Roxanne Desiderio; Hua Xu; Hashem B El-Serag; Fasiha Kanwal
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Is Not Associated with Thyroid Hormone Levels and Hypothyroidism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Veeravich Jaruvongvanich; Anawin Sanguankeo; Sikarin Upala
Journal:  Eur Thyroid J       Date:  2017-01-21

6.  Structural and practical identifiability of dual-input kinetic modeling in dynamic PET of liver inflammation.

Authors:  Yang Zuo; Souvik Sarkar; Michael T Corwin; Kristin Olson; Ramsey D Badawi; Guobao Wang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Free-breathing quantification of hepatic fat in healthy children and children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease using a multi-echo 3-D stack-of-radial MRI technique.

Authors:  Tess Armstrong; Karrie V Ly; Smruthi Murthy; Shahnaz Ghahremani; Grace Hyun J Kim; Kara L Calkins; Holden H Wu
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-05-04

Review 8.  Importance of imaging and recent developments in diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Mustafa Koplay; Mesut Sivri; Hasan Erdogan; Alaaddin Nayman
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-04-18

9.  Association between bone mineral density and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Korean adults.

Authors:  S H Lee; J M Yun; S H Kim; Y G Seo; H Min; E Chung; Y S Bae; I S Ryou; B Cho
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 10.  [Functional MR imaging of the liver].

Authors:  A Wibmer; R Nolz; M Trauner; A Ba-Ssalamah
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.