Literature DB >> 24966319

The genetic covariance between life cycle stages separated by metamorphosis.

J David Aguirre1, Mark W Blows2, Dustin J Marshall3.   

Abstract

Metamorphosis is common in animals, yet the genetic associations between life cycle stages are poorly understood. Given the radical changes that occur at metamorphosis, selection may differ before and after metamorphosis, and the extent that genetic associations between pre- and post-metamorphic traits constrain evolutionary change is a subject of considerable interest. In some instances, metamorphosis may allow the genetic decoupling of life cycle stages, whereas in others, metamorphosis could allow complementary responses to selection across the life cycle. Using a diallel breeding design, we measured viability at four ontogenetic stages (embryo, larval, juvenile and adult viability), in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis and examined the orientation of additive genetic variation with respect to the metamorphic boundary. We found support for one eigenvector of G: (gobsmax ), which contrasted larval viability against embryo viability and juvenile viability. Target matrix rotation confirmed that while gobsmax shows genetic associations can extend beyond metamorphosis, there is still considerable scope for decoupled phenotypic evolution. Therefore, although genetic associations across metamorphosis could limit that range of phenotypes that are attainable, traits on either side of the metamorphic boundary are capable of some independent evolutionary change in response to the divergent conditions encountered during each life cycle stage.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ciona; adaptive decoupling; genetic variance–covariance matrix; life-history evolution; target matrix rotation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24966319      PMCID: PMC4083807          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  27 in total

1.  Quantitative assessment of Hox complex expression in the indirect development of the polychaete annelid Chaetopterus sp.

Authors:  K J Peterson; S Q Irvine; R A Cameron; E H Davidson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Estimating evolutionary parameters when viability selection is operating.

Authors:  Jarrod D Hadfield
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Patterns of quantitative genetic variation in multiple dimensions.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-08-10       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Unifying life-history analyses for inference of fitness and population growth.

Authors:  Ruth G Shaw; Charles J Geyer; Stuart Wagenius; Helen H Hangelbroek; Julie R Etterson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Expression of the Hox gene complex in the indirect development of a sea urchin.

Authors:  C Arenas-Mena; P Martinez; R A Cameron; E H Davidson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-10-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Experimental analysis of character coupling across a complex life cycle: pigment pattern metamorphosis in the tiger salamander, Ambystoma tigrinum tigrinum.

Authors:  D M Parichy
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.804

Review 7.  Bayesian Assessment of Null Values Via Parameter Estimation and Model Comparison.

Authors:  John K Kruschke
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-05

8.  The effect of larval age on morphology and gene expression during ascidian metamorphosis.

Authors:  Molly W Jacobs; Sandie M Degnan; Rick Woods; Elizabeth Williams; Kathrein E Roper; Kathryn Green; Bernard M Degnan
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 3.326

9.  Genetic polymorphism and trade-offs in the early life-history strategy of the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg, 1795): a quantitative genetic study.

Authors:  B Ernande; J Clobert; H McCombie; P Boudry
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Natural variation and the capacity to adapt to ocean acidification in the keystone sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus.

Authors:  Morgan W Kelly; Jacqueline L Padilla-Gamiño; Gretchen E Hofmann
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 10.863

View more
  13 in total

1.  Simultaneous Estimation of Additive and Mutational Genetic Variance in an Outbred Population of Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Katrina McGuigan; J David Aguirre; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Do traits separated by metamorphosis evolve independently? Concepts and methods.

Authors:  Julie Collet; Simon Fellous
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Accounting for Sampling Error in Genetic Eigenvalues Using Random Matrix Theory.

Authors:  Jacqueline L Sztepanacz; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Evidence for complex life cycle constraints on salamander body form diversification.

Authors:  Ronald M Bonett; Andrea L Blair
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Development of G: a test in an amphibious fish.

Authors:  Joseph M Styga; Thomas M Houslay; Alastair J Wilson; Ryan L Earley
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 6.  Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies) as a bridge between ecology and evolutionary genomics.

Authors:  Seth Bybee; Alex Córdoba-Aguilar; M Catherine Duryea; Ryo Futahashi; Bengt Hansson; M Olalla Lorenzo-Carballa; Ruud Schilder; Robby Stoks; Anton Suvorov; Erik I Svensson; Janne Swaegers; Yuma Takahashi; Phillip C Watts; Maren Wellenreuther
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.172

7.  Signatures of natural selection between life cycle stages separated by metamorphosis in European eel.

Authors:  J M Pujolar; M W Jacobsen; D Bekkevold; J Lobón-Cervià; B Jónsson; L Bernatchez; M M Hansen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Global change, life-history complexity and the potential for evolutionary rescue.

Authors:  Dustin J Marshall; Scott C Burgess; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 5.183

9.  Anopheles gambiae larvae mount stronger immune responses against bacterial infection than adults: evidence of adaptive decoupling in mosquitoes.

Authors:  Garrett P League; Tania Y Estévez-Lao; Yan Yan; Valeria A Garcia-Lopez; Julián F Hillyer
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Carryover effects of larval environment on individual variation in a facultatively diadromous fish.

Authors:  Grégoire Saboret; Travis Ingram
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.