Literature DB >> 35867236

Emerging MR methods for improved diagnosis of prostate cancer by multiparametric MRI.

Durgesh Kumar Dwivedi1, Naranamangalam R Jagannathan2,3,4.   

Abstract

Current challenges of using serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level-based screening, such as the increased false positive rate, inability to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) with random biopsy, multifocality in PCa, and the molecular heterogeneity of PCa, can be addressed by integrating advanced multiparametric MR imaging (mpMRI) approaches into the diagnostic workup of PCa. The standard method for diagnosing PCa is a transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided systematic prostate biopsy, but it suffers from sampling errors and frequently fails to detect clinically significant PCa. mpMRI not only increases the detection of clinically significant PCa, but it also helps to reduce unnecessary biopsies because of its high negative predictive value. Furthermore, non-Cartesian image acquisition and compressed sensing have resulted in faster MR acquisition with improved signal-to-noise ratio, which can be used in quantitative MRI methods such as dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI. With the growing emphasis on the role of pre-biopsy mpMRI in the evaluation of PCa, there is an increased demand for innovative MRI methods that can improve PCa grading, detect clinically significant PCa, and biopsy guidance. To meet these demands, in addition to routine T1-weighted, T2-weighted, DCE-MRI, diffusion MRI, and MR spectroscopy, several new MR methods such as restriction spectrum imaging, vascular, extracellular, and restricted diffusion for cytometry in tumors (VERDICT) method, hybrid multi-dimensional MRI, luminal water imaging, and MR fingerprinting have been developed for a better characterization of the disease. Further, with the increasing interest in combining MR data with clinical and genomic data, there is a growing interest in utilizing radiomics and radiogenomics approaches. These big data can also be utilized in the development of computer-aided diagnostic tools, including automatic segmentation and the detection of clinically significant PCa using machine learning methods.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology (ESMRMB).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-aided diagnostic; MR fingerprinting; Multiparametric MRI; Prostate cancer; Restriction spectrum imaging; VERDICT

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35867236     DOI: 10.1007/s10334-022-01031-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.533


  142 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusion MR Imaging: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Mami Iima; Denis Le Bihan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3 T for prostate cancer: tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness.

Authors:  Hebert Alberto Vargas; Oguz Akin; Tobias Franiel; Yousef Mazaheri; Junting Zheng; Chaya Moskowitz; Kazuma Udo; James Eastham; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2022.

Authors:  Kimberly D Miller; Leticia Nogueira; Theresa Devasia; Angela B Mariotto; K Robin Yabroff; Ahmedin Jemal; Joan Kramer; Rebecca L Siegel
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 286.130

4.  Stratification of the aggressiveness of prostate cancer using pre-biopsy multiparametric MRI (mpMRI).

Authors:  Durgesh Kumar Dwivedi; Rajeev Kumar; Girdhar S Bora; Sanjay Thulkar; Sanjay Sharma; Siddhartha Datta Gupta; Naranamangalam R Jagannathan
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.044

5.  Overdiagnosis due to prostate-specific antigen screening: lessons from U.S. prostate cancer incidence trends.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; David F Penson; Julie M Legler; Dante di Tommaso; Rob Boer; Peter H Gann; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-07-03       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Role of magnetic resonance methods in the evaluation of prostate cancer: an Indian perspective.

Authors:  Naranamangalam R Jagannathan; Virendra Kumar; Rajeev Kumar; Sanjay Thulkar
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Potential of magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in predicting absence of prostate cancer in men with serum prostate-specific antigen between 4 and 10 ng/ml: a follow-up study.

Authors:  Rajeev Kumar; Rishi Nayyar; Virendra Kumar; Narmada P Gupta; Ashok K Hemal; N R Jagannathan; S Dattagupta; S Thulkar
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 8.  Quantitative Prostate MRI.

Authors:  Nicola Schieda; Christopher S Lim; Fatemeh Zabihollahy; Jorge Abreu-Gomez; Satheesh Krishna; Sungmin Woo; Gerd Melkus; Eran Ukwatta; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Prospective Inclusion of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients in Multiparametric Prostate MRI Structured Reports: Discrimination of Clinically Insignificant and Significant Cancers.

Authors:  Daniel N Costa; Yin Xi; Muhammad Aziz; Niccolo Passoni; Nabeel Shakir; Kenneth Goldberg; Franto Francis; Claus G Roehrborn; Alberto Diaz de Leon; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 10.  Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Masoom A Haider; Anwar R Padhani; Geert Villeirs; Katarzyna J Macura; Clare M Tempany; Peter L Choyke; Francois Cornud; Daniel J Margolis; Harriet C Thoeny; Sadhna Verma; Jelle Barentsz; Jeffrey C Weinreb
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.