Literature DB >> 23547105

Flash illusions induced by visual, auditory, and audiovisual stimuli.

Deborah Apthorp1, David Alais, Lars T Boenke.   

Abstract

When two objects are flashed at one location in close temporal proximity in the visual periphery, an intriguing illusion occurs whereby a single flash presented concurrently at another location appears to flash twice (the visual double-flash illusion: Chatterjee et al., 2011, Wilson & Singer, 1981). Here, for the first time, we investigate the time course of the effect, and directly compare it to the time course of the auditory (sound-induced flash illusion) effect, for both fission (single test flash, double inducer) and fusion (double test flash, single inducer) conditions, across stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) of 30 to 250 ms. In addition, using a novel audiovisual stimulus, we directly compare the cue strength of the two modalities, and whether they are additive in effect. The results show that the time course of fission and fusion is different for visual inducers, but not for auditory inducers. In audiovisual conditions, in situations of uncertainty, observers tended to follow the more reliable (auditory) cue. There was little evidence for a superadditive effect of auditory and visual cues; rather, observers tended to follow one or the other modality. The results suggest that the visually induced flash illusion and the auditory-induced effect may both stem from perceptual uncertainty, with the difference in time courses attributable to the lower temporal resolution of vision compared to audition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23547105     DOI: 10.1167/13.5.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  9 in total

1.  The sound-induced phosphene illusion.

Authors:  Nadia Bolognini; Silvia Convento; Martina Fusaro; Giuseppe Vallar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Phenomenology of the sound-induced flash illusion.

Authors:  Richard V Abadi; Jonathan S Murphy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Does hearing aid use affect audiovisual integration in mild hearing impairment?

Authors:  Anja Gieseler; Maike A S Tahden; Christiane M Thiel; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Audition influences color processing in the sound-induced visual flash illusion.

Authors:  Jyoti Mishra; Antigona Martinez; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Visual sensitivity is a stronger determinant of illusory processes than auditory cue parameters in the sound-induced flash illusion.

Authors:  Daniel P Kumpik; Helen E Roberts; Andrew J King; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Personal Audiovisual Aptitude Influences the Interaction Between Landscape and Soundscape Appraisal.

Authors:  Kang Sun; Gemma M Echevarria Sanchez; Bert De Coensel; Timothy Van Renterghem; Durk Talsma; Dick Botteldooren
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-22

7.  Effects of Audiovisual Interactions on Working Memory Task Performance-Interference or Facilitation.

Authors:  Yang He; Zhihua Guo; Xinlu Wang; Kewei Sun; Xinxin Lin; Xiuchao Wang; Fengzhan Li; Yaning Guo; Tingwei Feng; Junpeng Zhang; Congchong Li; Wenqing Tian; Xufeng Liu; Shengjun Wu
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-07-06

8.  The sound-induced flash illusion reveals dissociable age-related effects in multisensory integration.

Authors:  David P McGovern; Eugenie Roudaia; John Stapleton; T Martin McGinnity; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 5.750

9.  Emotional information affects fission illusion induced by audio-visual interactions.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Takeshima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.