Literature DB >> 24958641

Dual-site sampling improved detection rates for MRSA colonization in patients with cutaneous abscesses.

L May1, C McCann2, G Brooks3, R Rothman4, L Miller5, J Jordan2.   

Abstract

Extranasal sites are common reservoirs of Staphylococcus aureus colonization and may be relevant for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) screening and infection control strategies. The objective here was to determine whether inguinal specimens could also be screened using Xpert SA Nasal Complete assay for MRSA. Results were compared to broth enrichment culture. Among 162 consented adults seeking care in the emergency department for cutaneous abscesses, inguinal specimens were found positive for MRSA more often than nares specimens, 24% and 26% by PCR or culture, respectively, compared to 19% each by PCR or culture. Overall, 6% of adults colonized with MRSA would have been missed by nares screening alone. Compared to culture, Xpert SA Nasal Complete assay demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 89% and 97%, respectively, for detecting nares and/or inguinal MRSA colonization. In conclusion, inguinal specimens were a more common reservoir for MRSA than nares specimens in this population of patients.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cutaneous abscess; Emergency department; Infection control; Molecular diagnostics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24958641      PMCID: PMC4162831          DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  24 in total

1.  Adverse effects of contact isolation.

Authors:  K B Kirkland; J M Weinstein
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-10-02       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Evaluation of the Xpert methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) assay using the GeneXpert real-time PCR platform for rapid detection of MRSA from screening specimens.

Authors:  Angela S Rossney; Celine M Herra; Gráinne I Brennan; Pamela M Morgan; Brian O'Connell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Multicenter evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) test as a rapid screening method for detection of MRSA in nares.

Authors:  D M Wolk; E Picton; D Johnson; T Davis; P Pancholi; C C Ginocchio; S Finegold; D F Welch; M de Boer; D Fuller; M C Solomon; B Rogers; M S Mehta; L R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of MRSASelect Agar, CHROMagar Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Medium, and Xpert MRSA PCR for detection of MRSA in Nares: diagnostic accuracy for surveillance samples with various bacterial densities.

Authors:  D M Wolk; J L Marx; L Dominguez; D Driscoll; R B Schifman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Characterization of the best anatomical sites in screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization.

Authors:  Y Bitterman; A Laor; S Itzhaki; G Weber
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Legislative mandates for use of active surveillance cultures to screen for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci: Position statement from the Joint SHEA and APIC Task Force.

Authors:  Stephen G Weber; Susan S Huang; Shannon Oriola; W Charles Huskins; Gary A Noskin; Kathleen Harriman; Russell N Olmsted; Marc Bonten; Tammy Lundstrom; Michael W Climo; Mary-Claire Roghmann; Cathryn L Murphy; Tobi B Karchmer
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.918

Review 7.  Do guidelines for the prevention and control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus make a difference?

Authors:  H Humphreys
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 8.067

8.  Do physicians examine patients in contact isolation less frequently? A brief report.

Authors:  Sanjay Saint; Leigh Ann Higgins; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Carol Chenoweth
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.918

9.  Body site colonization in patients with community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and other types of S. aureus skin infections.

Authors:  E S Yang; J Tan; S Eells; G Rieg; G Tagudar; L G Miller
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 8.067

10.  Safety of patients isolated for infection control.

Authors:  Henry Thomas Stelfox; David W Bates; Donald A Redelmeier
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

1.  Analysis of the effects of cigarette smoke on staphylococcal virulence phenotypes.

Authors:  Elisa K McEachern; John H Hwang; Katherine M Sladewski; Shari Nicatia; Carola Dewitz; Denzil P Mathew; Victor Nizet; Laura E Crotty Alexander
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Use of Rapid Molecular Testing for Staphylococcus aureus for Patients With Cutaneous Abscesses in the Emergency Department With Standard of Care.

Authors:  Larissa S May; Richard E Rothman; Loren G Miller; Gillian Brooks; Mark Zocchi; Catherine Zatorski; Andrea F Dugas; Chelsea E Ware; Jeanne A Jordan
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.254

3.  Clinical Relevance of Xpert MRSA/SA in Guiding Therapeutic Decisions for Staphylococcal Infections: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Analysis.

Authors:  Suvash Chandra Ojha; Ke Chen; Changfeng Sun; Sarfraz Ahmed; Yun-Jian Sheng; Cun-Liang Deng
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2022-04-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.