Literature DB >> 17327185

Legislative mandates for use of active surveillance cultures to screen for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci: Position statement from the Joint SHEA and APIC Task Force.

Stephen G Weber1, Susan S Huang, Shannon Oriola, W Charles Huskins, Gary A Noskin, Kathleen Harriman, Russell N Olmsted, Marc Bonten, Tammy Lundstrom, Michael W Climo, Mary-Claire Roghmann, Cathryn L Murphy, Tobi B Karchmer.   

Abstract

Legislation aimed at controlling antimicrobial-resistant pathogens through the use of active surveillance cultures to screen hospitalized patients has been introduced in at least 2 US states. In response to the proposed legislation, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc., (APIC) have developed this joint position statement. Both organizations are dedicated to combating health care-associated infections with a wide array of methods, including the use of active surveillance cultures in appropriate circumstances. This position statement reviews the proposed legislation and the rationale for use of active surveillance cultures, examines the scientific evidence supporting the use of this strategy, and discusses a number of unresolved issues surrounding legislation mandating use of active surveillance cultures. The following 5 consensus points are offered. (1) Although reducing the burden of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), is of preeminent importance, the APIC and the SHEA do not support legislation to mandate use of active surveillance cultures to screen for MRSA, VRE, or other antimicrobial-resistant pathogens. (2) The SHEA and the APIC support the continued development, validation, and application of efficacious and cost-effective strategies for the prevention of infections caused by MRSA, VRE, and other antimicrobial-resistant and antimicrobial-susceptible pathogens. (3) The APIC and the SHEA welcome efforts by health care consumers, together with private, local, state, and federal policy makers, to focus attention on and formulate solutions for the growing problem of antimicrobial resistance and health care-associated infections. (4) The SHEA and the APIC support ongoing additional research to determine and optimize the appropriateness, utility, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness of using active surveillance cultures to screen both lower-risk and high-risk populations. (5) The APIC and the SHEA support stronger collaboration between state and local public health authorities and institutional infection prevention and control experts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17327185     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  24 in total

Review 1.  Current trends in rapid diagnostics for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and glycopeptide-resistant enterococcus species.

Authors:  Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar; Kelly Haccuria; Mindy Michiels; Margareta Ieven; Claire Poyart; Waleria Hryniewicz; Herman Goossens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  A perspective on how the United States fell behind Northern Europe in the battle against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Kevin T Kavanagh; Daniel M Saman; Yanling Yu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Additive effects of exogenous IL-12 supplementation and antibiotic treatment in infection prophylaxis.

Authors:  Brandon M Boyce; Brock A Lindsey; Nina B Clovis; E Suzanne Smith; Gerald R Hobbs; David F Hubbard; Sanford E Emery; John B Barnett; Bingyun Li
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 4.  Economics of infection control surveillance technology: cost-effective or just cost?

Authors:  Jon P Furuno; Marin L Schweizer; Jessina C McGregor; Eli N Perencevich
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.918

5.  Clinical application of real-time PCR to screening critically ill and emergency-care surgical patients for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a quantitative analytical study.

Authors:  M Trent Herdman; Duncan Wyncoll; Eugene Halligan; Penelope R Cliff; Gary French; Jonathan D Edgeworth
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Dual-site sampling improved detection rates for MRSA colonization in patients with cutaneous abscesses.

Authors:  L May; C McCann; G Brooks; R Rothman; L Miller; J Jordan
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.803

7.  The role of surveillance cultures in the prediction of susceptibility patterns of Gram-negative bacilli in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  H Baba; G R Nimmo; A M Allworth; R J Boots; Y Hayashi; J Lipman; D L Paterson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Do contact precautions cause depression? A two-year study at a tertiary care medical centre.

Authors:  H R Day; E N Perencevich; A D Harris; S S Himelhoch; C H Brown; A L Gruber-Baldini; E Dotter; D J Morgan
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Evaluation of a new selective medium, BD BBL CHROMagar MRSA II, for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in different specimens.

Authors:  C Wendt; N L Havill; K C Chapin; J M Boyce; R Dickenson; U Eigner; S Schütt; A M Fahr
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Evaluation of a chromogenic agar under development to screen for VRE colonization.

Authors:  George Kallstrom; Christopher D Doern; W Michael Dunne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.