| Literature DB >> 24957036 |
Heiko Wagner1, Anne Jungandreas2, Andrea Fanesi3, Christian Wilhelm4.
Abstract
When microalgae are exposed to changing envEntities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24957036 PMCID: PMC4101516 DOI: 10.3390/metabo4020453
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolites ISSN: 2218-1989
Figure 1Comparison of two different methods for spectra interpretation. (a) Peak integral quantification of macromolecule contents [10]. Peak integrals have been marked (green: lipid; blue: protein; orange: carbohydrate); (b) Spectra reconstruction by reference spectra (green: lipid; blue: protein; orange: carbohydrate) of the same cell spectra according to [13]. Vertical lines indicate main peaks of the cell spectra.
Figure 2Carbohydrate (orange) and protein (blue) levels of Phaeodactylum tricornutum grown at blue light (465 nm) of (a) 10 µmol absorbed photons m−2 s−1 (QPhar) and (b) 30 µmol absorbed photons m−2 s−1 or at red light (660 nm) of (c) 10 µmol absorbed photons m−2 s−1 and (d) 30 µmol absorbed photons m−2 s−1 in a 14 h light/10 h dark cycle. The time axes correspond to the time in the light phase. FTIR spectra were detected every 2 h and used for the calculation of the macromolecular composition (according to Wagner et al. 2010). The carbohydrate and protein levels were normalized to the values at 3 h into the light phase (t3) (modified according to [42].