Literature DB >> 24955041

Natural progression of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction.

Antony Leslie Innasimuthu1, Sanjay Kumar1, Jason Lazar1, William E Katz1.   

Abstract

Because the natural progression of low-gradient aortic stenosis (LGAS) has not been well defined, we performed a retrospective study of 116 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis who had undergone follow-up echocardiography at a median interval of 698 days (range, 371-1,020 d). All patients had preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (>0.50) during and after follow-up. At baseline, patients were classified by aortic valve area (AVA) as having mild stenosis (≥1.5 cm(2)), moderate stenosis (≥1 to <1.5 cm(2)), or severe stenosis (<1 cm(2)). Severe aortic stenosis was further classified by mean gradient (LGAS, mean <40 mmHg; high-gradient aortic stenosis [HGAS], mean ≥40 mmHg). We compared baseline and follow-up values among 4 groups: patients with mild stenosis, moderate stenosis, LGAS, and HGAS. At baseline, 30 patients had mild stenosis, 54 had moderate stenosis, 24 had LGAS, and 8 had HGAS. Compared with the moderate group, the LGAS group had lower AVA but similar mean gradient. Yet the actuarial curves for progressing to HGAS were significantly different: 25% of patients in LGAS reached HGAS status significantly earlier than did 25% of patients in the moderate-AS group (713 vs 881 d; P=0.035). Because LGAS has a high propensity to progress to HGAS, we propose that low-gradient aortic stenosis patients be closely monitored as a distinct subgroup that warrants more frequent echocardiographic follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve stenosis; blood flow velocity; calcinosis/complications; disease progression; echocardiography; forecasting; prognosis; retrospective studies; risk assessment; stroke volume; time factors; ventricular function, left

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24955041      PMCID: PMC4060332          DOI: 10.14503/THIJ-13-3167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J        ISSN: 0730-2347


  35 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Blase A Carabello
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Timing of surgery in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  K Aikawa; C M Otto
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 8.194

Review 3.  Aortic stenosis.

Authors:  J Ross; E Braunwald
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  T Skjaerpe; L Hegrenaes; L Hatle
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Assessment and follow-up of patients with aortic regurgitation by an updated Doppler echocardiographic measurement of the regurgitant fraction in the aortic arch.

Authors:  T Touche; R Prasquier; A Nitenberg; D de Zuttere; R Gourgon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite normal ejection fraction is associated with severe left ventricular dysfunction as assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Jérôme Adda; Christopher Mielot; Roch Giorgi; Frédéric Cransac; Xavier Zirphile; Erwan Donal; Catherine Sportouch-Dukhan; Patricia Réant; Stéphane Laffitte; Stéphane Cade; Yvan Le Dolley; Franck Thuny; Nathalie Touboul; Cécile Lavoute; Jean-François Avierinos; Patrizio Lancellotti; Gilbert Habib
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 7.792

7.  Aortic valve area discrepancy by Gorlin equation and Doppler echocardiography continuity equation: relationship to flow in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.

Authors:  I G Burwash; A Dickinson; R J Teskey; J W Tam; K L Chan
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.223

8.  Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis.

Authors:  R Rosenhek; T Binder; G Porenta; I Lang; G Christ; M Schemper; G Maurer; H Baumgartner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-08-31       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Demonstration of left ventricular outflow tract eccentricity by real time 3D echocardiography: implications for the determination of aortic valve area.

Authors:  Sanjay Doddamani; Ricardo Bello; Mark A Friedman; Anita Banerjee; James H Bowers; Bette Kim; Prashant R Vennalaganti; Robert J Ostfeld; Garet M Gordon; Divya Malhotra; Daniel M Spevack
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.724

10.  Aortic valve stenosis: fatal natural history despite normal left ventricular function and low invasive peak-to-peak pressure gradients.

Authors:  Kent Lodberg Christensen; Hanne Ramløv Ivarsen; Leif Thuesen; Bent Østergaard Kristensen; Henrik Egeblad
Journal:  Cardiology       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 1.869

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.