Literature DB >> 15334024

Aortic valve stenosis: fatal natural history despite normal left ventricular function and low invasive peak-to-peak pressure gradients.

Kent Lodberg Christensen1, Hanne Ramløv Ivarsen, Leif Thuesen, Bent Østergaard Kristensen, Henrik Egeblad.   

Abstract

For many years, the severity of valvular aortic stenosis (AS) was evaluated mainly on the basis of cardiac catheterization. In many centers, the handy peak-to-peak transvalvular pressure difference or 'peak-to-peak gradient' in relation to left ventricular function was used as a crucial feature in taking a decision regarding valve substitution. In a prospective study during the period 1994-1997, 150 consecutive patients with AS were examined systematically using cardiac catherization as well as transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography. The study was performed in order to compare the diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of the three modalities with the purpose of improving our evaluation strategy. We found that the three methods were able to determine the aortic valve area with similar accuracy and reproducibility. The data thus support earlier papers and the currently recommended strategy of managing most patients on the basis of TTE since this approach is more rapid and gentle to the patients. In accordance with the past policy of our department, however, considerable weight was put on the invasive data during the study period. Thus, 12 patients with invasive peak-to-peak gradient <50 mm Hg and no severe depression of left ventricular function were not offered valve replacement, despite symptoms and significant valve area reductions. At 2.5 years of follow-up, 6 had died, 3 of severe heart failure, 2 while awaiting scheduled valve replacement, and 1 during aortocoronary bypass surgery. Another 3 patients later experienced further symptom progression and underwent successful aortic valve replacement. In the remaining 3 patients, all free from coronary stenoses and other valvular heart disease than AS, heart failure symptoms had worsened considerably during continued medical therapy. In conclusion, we do not recommend consideration of the peak-to-peak gradient in the process of deciding whether or not AS patients should receive valve replacement. A low peak-to-peak gradient does not exclude severe AS, even in the presence of preserved left ventricular function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15334024     DOI: 10.1159/000080482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiology        ISSN: 0008-6312            Impact factor:   1.869


  5 in total

Review 1.  Surgical aspects of congestive heart failure.

Authors:  Daniel J Goldstein; Douglas Smego; Robert E Michler
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 2.  Low gradient "severe" aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Alper Ozkan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-03

3.  Invasive hemodynamic assessments during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: comparison of patient outcomes in higher vs. lower transvalvular gradients with respect to left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Jury Schewel; Dimitry Schewel; Christian Frerker; Peter Wohlmuth; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Ulrich Schäfer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Natural progression of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Antony Leslie Innasimuthu; Sanjay Kumar; Jason Lazar; William E Katz
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2014-06-01

Review 5.  Coronary Microcirculation in Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Hannah Z R McConkey; Michael Marber; Amedeo Chiribiri; Philippe Pibarot; Simon R Redwood; Bernard D Prendergast
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 6.546

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.