Literature DB >> 3896563

Assessment and follow-up of patients with aortic regurgitation by an updated Doppler echocardiographic measurement of the regurgitant fraction in the aortic arch.

T Touche, R Prasquier, A Nitenberg, D de Zuttere, R Gourgon.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the value and limitations of an updated Doppler echocardiographic measurement of the aortic regurgitant fraction derived from the comparison of forward and reverse flows in the aortic arch. The method was based on the improvements in sampling and displaying Doppler frequencies and blood velocities provided by pulsed-emission, two-dimensional location, and spectral analysis and on an account for variations of aortic diameter through an M mode record of the aortic arch. Relevant statistical comparisons were performed between simultaneous noninvasive and invasive determinations of the regurgitant fraction in a group of 30 patients with aortic regurgitation (group I) and between simultaneous noninvasive and invasive measurements of variations of the regurgitant fraction induced by atrial pacing or vasodilator administration in 12 patients of this group. The two basal determinations were closely correlated (r = .90). The invasive regurgitant fraction ranged from 0% to 80%. The standard error of the Doppler estimate was 8.8% in group I as a whole and was only 6% in a subgroup of 20 patients with a high systolic aortic flow pattern, defined as both peak velocity above 0.8 m/sec and duration of systolic flow above 0.24 sec. This pattern was present in almost all (19/22) patients in whom the aortic regurgitation was more than moderate by invasive criterion (regurgitant fraction above 40%). The standard error of the Doppler estimate of variations of the regurgitant fraction was only 6.6%. Among 100 additional patients with aortic regurgitation (group II), only 12 had no pandiastolic reverse flow in the arch, and their regurgitation was always mild at aortographic examination.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3896563     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.72.4.819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  9 in total

Review 1.  A practical approach to the quantification of valvular regurgitation.

Authors:  Ron Jacob; William J Stewart
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  End diastolic flow velocity just beneath the aortic isthmus assessed by pulsed Doppler echocardiography: a new predictor of the aortic regurgitant fraction.

Authors:  C Tribouilloy; P Avinée; W F Shen; J L Rey; M Slama; J P Lesbre
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1991-01

3.  Natural progression of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Antony Leslie Innasimuthu; Sanjay Kumar; Jason Lazar; William E Katz
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2014-06-01

Review 4.  Assessment of cardiac hemodynamics and valvular function by Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  D C Wallerson; J Dubin; R B Devereux
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1987-10

Review 5.  Quantitative applications of Doppler cardiography in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  S D Colan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Neonatal anatomical correction of transposition of the great arteries: non-invasive assessment of haemodynamic function up to four years after operation.

Authors:  J L Gibbs; S A Qureshi; R Martin; N Wilson; M H Yacoub; R R Smith
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1988-07

7.  Influence of left ventricular relaxation on the pressure half time of aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  S F de Marchi; S Windecker; B C Aeschbacher; C Seiler
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Quantification of aortic regurgitation using Doppler imaging.

Authors:  H Raffoul; B Diebold; J P Guglielmi; R Touati; J Forman; P Ourbak; P Peronneau
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1987

9.  Holodiastolic Flow Reversal at the Descending Aorta on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance is Neither Sensitive Nor Specific for Significant Aortic Regurgitation in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Catherine M Avitabile; Kevin K Whitehead; Mark A Fogel; Daniel W Kim; Timothy S Kim; Julian D Rose; Marc S Keller; Gregory L Fu; Matthew A Harris
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 1.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.