| Literature DB >> 24954358 |
Sandra Salem1, Chan Gao, Ailian Li, Huifen Wang, Loan Nguyen-Yamamoto, David Goltzman, Janet E Henderson, Philippe Gros.
Abstract
Increased risk of <span class="Disease">bone fractures is observed in <span class="Species">patients with chronic inflammatory conditions, such as inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatoid arthritis. Members of the Interferon Response Factor family of transcriptional regulators, IRF1 and IRF8, have been identified as genetic risk factors for several chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. We have investigated a potential role for the Irf1 gene in bone metabolism. Here, we report that Irf1(-/-) mutant mice show altered bone morphology in association with altered trabecular bone architecture and increased cortical thickness and cellularity. Ex vivo studies on cells derived from bone marrow stimulated with Rank ligand revealed an increase in size and resorptive activity of tartrate-resistant acid-positive cells from Irf1(-/-) mutant mice compared with wild-type control mice. Irf1 deficiency was also associated with decreased proliferation of bone marrow-derived osteoblast precursors ex vivo, concomitant with increased mineralization activity compared with control cells. We show that Irf1 plays a role in bone metabolism and suggest that Irf1 regulates the maturation and activity of osteoclasts and osteoblasts. The altered bone phenotype of Irf1(-/-) mutants is strikingly similar to that of Stat1(-/-) mice, suggesting that the two interacting proteins play a critical enabling role in the common regulation of these two cell lineages.Entities:
Keywords: bone development; bone resorption; knockout mouse; mesenchymal cell differentiation; osteoclast differentiation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24954358 PMCID: PMC4152406 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.12327
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Fig. 1Radiological analysis of femurs from control and Irf1 mice. High-resolution X-ray (A), bone mineral density (B) 2D (C) and 3D (D) micro-CT from representative 8-week-old wild-type (Bl6) and mutant (Irf1−/−) are shown. B: ***P < 0.001.
Quantitative micro-CT
| Parameter (unit) | Trabecular bone adjacent to GP | Trabecular bone away from GP | Cortical bone in diaphysis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT | WT | WT | |||||||
| TV | 4.31 | 4.43 | NS | 2.97 | 2.74 | NS | 1.10 | 1.20 | 0.009 |
| BV/TV (%) | 16.1 | 16.2 | NS | 5.75 | 3.41 | 0.008 | 98.9 | 99.0 | NS |
| BS/TV (mm−1) | 11.5 | 11.2 | NS | 4.83 | 2.89 | 0.001 | 13.1 | 11.9 | 0.002 |
| Tb.Sp (mm−1) | 0.22 | 0.25 | NS | 0.34 | 0.61 | 0.008 | – | – | – |
| Tb.N (mm−1) | 2.63 | 2.55 | NS | 0.93 | 0.50 | 0.004 | – | – | – |
| Po.N (cl) | 23.5 | 76.5 | 0.001 | 2.00 | 4.75 | NS | 150 | 429 | 0.002 |
| SMI | NS | 2.68 | 3.46 | 0.025 | 0.16 | −1.52 | 0.002 | ||
TV, total volume; BV/TV, bone volume/total volume; BS/TV, bone surface/total volume; Tb.Sp, trabecular separation; Tb.N, trabecular number; Po.N (cl), number of closed pores; SMI, structure model index.
Fig. 2Histological analysis of bone apposition in control and Irf1 mice. Representative B6 (A–E) and Irf1 (F–J) bone was sectioned at 10 μm and imaged with a fluorescence microscope before staining with Von Kossa/Toluidine blue and re-imaging. Boxed areas (A and F) identify the regions shown at higher magnification (B, C, G, H) with the corresponding fluorescence images of calcein labelling. Arrowheads indicate the regions of cortical bone shown at higher magnification (D, E, I, J) with the corresponding fluorescence images. Scale bars represent 500 μm (A and F) and 200 μm (B–E, G–J).
Fig. 3Histochemical staining of femurs from control and Irf1 mice. Five-micron sections of decalcified bone from representative B6 (A) and Irf1 (D) mice were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (A and D) for bone marrow (inset). Five-micron sections of un-decalcified bone were stained for alkaline phosphatase activity (brown) in hypertrophic chondrocytes and osteoblasts (B and E) or for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase activity (arrowheads) in osteoclasts (C and F). Scale bars represent 500 μm (A and D) and 50 μm (inset) or 200 μm (B, C, E, F). Bone histomorphometric measurements of osteoblast surface per bone surface (Ob. S/BS; G) and osteoclast number per bone surface (N. Oc/BS; H).
Fig. 4Altered osteoblast function in Irf1 mice. (A) Marrow stromal cells (MSCs) isolated from 8-week-old male mice were maintained in medium and cells were counted at days 3, 6 and 9. Results represented as means ± SD, n = 4. **P < 0.05. (B) Bone MSCs were isolated from 8-week-old male Irf1 mice and WT controls and maintained in osteoblast differentiation medium consisting of ascorbic acid and β-glycerophosphate for 10 or 15 days. Cultures were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and stained in situ for ALP activity and with silver nitrate (von Kossa) to detect mineralized nodules. (C) Microscopic images of mineralized nodules (three independent experiments; n = 3 mice/group). (D) Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of mRNA expression of Osteocalcin (Ocn), Osteopontin (Opn), Matrix gla protein (Mgp), Receptor activator of NFκB ligand (Rankl) in cultured osteoblasts (at day 6). Expression of test genes is relative to Gapdh, which was used as an internal control (mean of three experiments ± SD).
Fig. 5Enhanced osteoclast activity and bone resorption in Irf1 mice. (A) Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs) from 8-week-old Irf1 mice and WT controls were stimulated with RANKL in the presence of M-CSF to produce osteoclasts. After 7 days, TRAP staining was performed. TRAP-positive cells appear as large, multi-nucleated cells (MNCs). (B) The number of TRAP-positive MNCs containing at least three nuclei was quantitated. (C) BMMs were plated on OsteoAssay plates coated with inorganic synthetic followed by stimulation with RANKL for 7 days to induce formation of resorption pits. (D) The number of resorption pits, and the total relative resorption area were counted by using Image J software. Results represented as means from nine independent experiments (±SD). ***P < 0.0001, **P < 0.001. NS, no statistical significance.
Fig. 6Biomechanical testing reveals stronger bones in Irf1−/− mice. Biomechanical testing by a three-point bending assay was performed and analysis demonstrated stiffness (A), force (B), ultimate displacement (d.Ult; C) and ultimate force to point (D); n = 5. Results represented as means (±SD). ***P < 0.0001. NS, no statistical significance.