Literature DB >> 24951808

Use of anidulafungin as a surrogate marker to predict susceptibility and resistance to caspofungin among 4,290 clinical isolates of Candida by using CLSI methods and interpretive criteria.

Michael A Pfaller1, Daniel J Diekema2, Ronald N Jones3, Mariana Castanheira3.   

Abstract

This study addressed the application of anidulafungin as a surrogate marker to predict the susceptibility of Candida to caspofungin due to unacceptably high interlaboratory variation of caspofungin MIC values. CLSI reference broth microdilution methods and species-specific interpretive criteria were used to test 4,290 strains of Candida (eight species), including 71 strains with documented fks mutations. Caspofungin MIC values were compared with those of anidulafungin to determine the percentage of categorical agreement (CA) and very major (VME), major (ME), and minor error rates, as well as the ability to detect fks mutants. For all 4,290 isolates the CA was 97.1% (0.2% VME and ME, 2.5% minor errors) using anidulafungin as the surrogate. Among the 62 isolates of Candida albicans (4 isolates), C. tropicalis (5 isolates), C. krusei (4 isolates), C. kefyr (2 isolates), and C. glabrata (47 isolates) that were nonsusceptible (NS; either intermediate [I] or resistant [R]) to both caspofungin and anidulafungin, 52 (83.8%) contained a mutation in fks1 or fks2. Eight mutants of C. glabrata, two of C. albicans, and one each of C. tropicalis and C. krusei were classified as susceptible (S) to both antifungal agents. The remaining 7 mutants (2 C. albicans and 5 C. glabrata) were susceptible to one of the agents and either intermediate or resistant to the other. Using the epidemiological cutoff value (ECV) of 0.12 μg/ml for both caspofungin and anidulafungin to differentiate wild-type (WT) from non-WT strains of C. glabrata, 42 of the 55 (76.4%) C. glabrata mutants were non-WT and 8 of the 55 (14.5%) were WT for both agents (90.9% concordance). Anidulafungin can accurately serve as a surrogate marker to predict S and R of Candida to caspofungin.
Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24951808      PMCID: PMC4313142          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00782-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  32 in total

Review 1.  Setting and revising antibacterial susceptibility breakpoints.

Authors:  John Turnidge; David L Paterson
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Correlation of MIC with outcome for Candida species tested against caspofungin, anidulafungin, and micafungin: analysis and proposal for interpretive MIC breakpoints.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; D J Diekema; L Ostrosky-Zeichner; J H Rex; B D Alexander; D Andes; S D Brown; V Chaturvedi; M A Ghannoum; C C Knapp; D J Sheehan; T J Walsh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Novel FKS mutations associated with echinocandin resistance in Candida species.

Authors:  Guillermo Garcia-Effron; Daniel Joseph Chua; Jon Rupert Tomada; Joseph DiPersio; David S Perlin; Mahmoud Ghannoum; Hector Bonilla
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Echinocandin susceptibility testing of Candida species: comparison of EUCAST EDef 7.1, CLSI M27-A3, Etest, disk diffusion, and agar dilution methods with RPMI and isosensitest media.

Authors:  Maiken Cavling Arendrup; Guillermo Garcia-Effron; Cornelia Lass-Flörl; Alicia Gomez Lopez; Juan-Luis Rodriguez-Tudela; Manuel Cuenca-Estrella; David S Perlin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Can antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin predict susceptibility to a newer fluoroquinolone, gatifloxacin?: Report from The SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997-99).

Authors:  R N Jones; M A Pfaller
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.803

6.  Wild-type MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for the echinocandins and Candida spp.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; L Boyken; R J Hollis; J Kroeger; S A Messer; S Tendolkar; R N Jones; J Turnidge; D J Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Breakthrough Aspergillus fumigatus and Candida albicans double infection during caspofungin treatment: laboratory characteristics and implication for susceptibility testing.

Authors:  Maiken Cavling Arendrup; Guillermo Garcia-Effron; Walter Buzina; Klaus Leth Mortensen; Nanna Reiter; Christian Lundin; Henrik Elvang Jensen; Cornelia Lass-Flörl; David S Perlin; Brita Bruun
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Effect of Candida glabrata FKS1 and FKS2 mutations on echinocandin sensitivity and kinetics of 1,3-beta-D-glucan synthase: implication for the existing susceptibility breakpoint.

Authors:  Guillermo Garcia-Effron; Samuel Lee; Steven Park; John D Cleary; David S Perlin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Multicenter study of anidulafungin and micafungin MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for eight Candida species and the CLSI M27-A3 broth microdilution method.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; A Espinel-Ingroff; B Bustamante; E Canton; D J Diekema; A Fothergill; J Fuller; G M Gonzalez; J Guarro; C Lass-Flörl; S R Lockhart; E Martin-Mazuelos; J F Meis; L Ostrosky-Zeichner; T Pelaez; G St-Germain; J Turnidge
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  Peter G Pappas; Carol A Kauffman; David Andes; Daniel K Benjamin; Thierry F Calandra; John E Edwards; Scott G Filler; John F Fisher; Bart-Jan Kullberg; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; Annette C Reboli; John H Rex; Thomas J Walsh; Jack D Sobel
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 9.079

View more
  22 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of a new commercial colorimetric microdilution assay (SensiQuattro Candida EU) with MIC test strip and EUCAST broth microdilution methods for susceptibility testing of invasive Candida isolates.

Authors:  Hedda Luise Koehling; Birgit Willinger; Jan Buer; Peter-Michael Rath; Joerg Steinmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Implication of Candida parapsilosis FKS1 and FKS2 mutations in reduced echinocandin susceptibility.

Authors:  M Martí-Carrizosa; F Sánchez-Reus; F March; E Cantón; P Coll
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Molecular Analysis of Resistance and Detection of Non-Wild-Type Strains Using Etest Epidemiological Cutoff Values for Amphotericin B and Echinocandins for Bloodstream Candida Infections from a Tertiary Hospital in Qatar.

Authors:  Saad J Taj-Aldeen; Husam Salah; Winder B Perez; Muna Almaslamani; Mary Motyl; Atqah AbdulWahab; Kelley R Healey; David S Perlin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Monitoring Antifungal Resistance in a Global Collection of Invasive Yeasts and Molds: Application of CLSI Epidemiological Cutoff Values and Whole-Genome Sequencing Analysis for Detection of Azole Resistance in Candida albicans.

Authors:  Mariana Castanheira; Lalitagauri M Deshpande; Andrew P Davis; Paul R Rhomberg; Michael A Pfaller
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Multicenter Study of Method-Dependent Epidemiological Cutoff Values for Detection of Resistance in Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. to Amphotericin B and Echinocandins for the Etest Agar Diffusion Method.

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; M Arendrup; E Cantón; S Cordoba; E Dannaoui; J García-Rodríguez; G M Gonzalez; N P Govender; E Martin-Mazuelos; M Lackner; C Lass-Flörl; M J Linares Sicilia; M A Rodriguez-Iglesias; T Pelaez; R K Shields; G Garcia-Effron; J Guinea; M Sanguinetti; J Turnidge
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Antifungal susceptibility profiles of bloodstream yeast isolates by Sensititre YeastOne over nine years at a large Italian teaching hospital.

Authors:  Brunella Posteraro; Teresa Spanu; Barbara Fiori; Flavio De Maio; Elena De Carolis; Alessia Giaquinto; Valentina Prete; Giulia De Angelis; Riccardo Torelli; Tiziana D'Inzeo; Antonietta Vella; Alessio De Luca; Mario Tumbarello; Walter Ricciardi; Maurizio Sanguinetti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Antifungal Susceptibility Testing: Current Approaches.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Berkow; Shawn R Lockhart; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Anidulafungin Susceptibility Testing of Candida glabrata Isolates from Blood Cultures by the MALDI Biotyper Antibiotic (Antifungal) Susceptibility Test Rapid Assay.

Authors:  Mansoureh Vatanshenassan; Amir Arastehfar; Teun Boekhout; Judith Berman; Cornelia Lass-Flörl; Katrin Sparbier; Markus Kostrzewa
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Echinocandin Resistance in Candida Species: a Review of Recent Developments.

Authors:  Nathan P Wiederhold
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.725

10.  Hot topics in antifungal susceptibility testing: A new drug, a bad bug, sweeping caspofungin testing under the rug, and solving the ECV shrug.

Authors:  Shawn R Lockhart; Elizabeth L Berkow
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Newsl       Date:  2016-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.