Literature DB >> 11404067

Can antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin predict susceptibility to a newer fluoroquinolone, gatifloxacin?: Report from The SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997-99).

R N Jones1, M A Pfaller.   

Abstract

A serious problem confronting clinical laboratories and hospital formulary practices is the delayed availability of approved, commercially prepared susceptibility test reagents for newer antimicrobials. A current example is gatifloxacin, a new 8-methoxy fluoroquinolone with expanded potency against many Gram-positive pathogens. This study addresses the use of "surrogate marker" fluoroquinolones to predict susceptibility for gatifloxacin. Reference broth microdilution MIC results for 29,632 strains isolated in United States medical centers (SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997-99) were used: staphylococci (9,940 strains), enterococci (2,570), Streptococcus pneumoniae (3,784), Enterobacteriaceae (10,670) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (2,668). Gatifloxacin interpretation categories were compared to those of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin by regression statistics and error rate bounding analyses. For the Enterobacteriaceae, the absolute categorical agreement was 97.9 to 98.7% (false-susceptible or very-major error [VME], 0.03%-0.1%) for comparisons of both ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin with gatifloxacin. P. aeruginosa testing was more problematic (higher minor error rates), but acceptable at 0.6% to 1.1% VME and a 85.7% to 89.9% overall agreement. Ciprofloxacin results used to predict gatifloxacin in Gram-positive species was almost without VME (0.0%-0.2%) because gatifloxacin was significantly superior against these species, especially for S. pneumoniae, where gatifloxacin (MIC(90,) 0.5 microg/ml) was fourfold more potent than levofloxacin (MIC(90,) 2 microg/ml). The preferred gatifloxacin predictor drug was ciprofloxacin for all species except S. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa, where levofloxacin results had a slightly greater predictive value. Susceptibility testing results for selected currently available fluoroquinolones can be used to predict susceptibility to gatifloxacin with high confidence. Many Gram-positive cocci, however, will be categorized as false-resistant by this interim method since gatifloxacin has a 11% to 34% wider spectrum of activity compared to ciprofloxacin when testing staphylococci and enterococci. Clinical laboratories can reliably use these suggested "surrogate markers" until reliable tests for gatifloxacin become available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11404067     DOI: 10.1016/s0732-8893(01)00229-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  10 in total

1.  Use of in vitro vancomycin testing results to predict susceptibility to oritavancin, a new long-acting lipoglycopeptide.

Authors:  Ronald N Jones; John D Turnidge; Greg Moeck; Francis F Arhin; Rodrigo E Mendes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Use of anidulafungin as a surrogate marker to predict susceptibility and resistance to caspofungin among 4,290 clinical isolates of Candida by using CLSI methods and interpretive criteria.

Authors:  Michael A Pfaller; Daniel J Diekema; Ronald N Jones; Mariana Castanheira
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Selection of a surrogate agent (vancomycin or teicoplanin) for initial susceptibility testing of dalbavancin: results from an international antimicrobial surveillance program.

Authors:  Ronald N Jones; Helio S Sader; Thomas R Fritsche; Patricia A Hogan; Daniel J Sheehan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Use of micafungin as a surrogate marker to predict susceptibility and resistance to caspofungin among 3,764 clinical isolates of Candida by use of CLSI methods and interpretive criteria.

Authors:  Michael A Pfaller; Shawn A Messer; Daniel J Diekema; Ronald N Jones; Mariana Castanheira
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of in vitro activities of gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin against four taxa of rapidly growing mycobacteria.

Authors:  Barbara A Brown-Elliott; Richard J Wallace; Christopher J Crist; Linda Mann; Rebecca W Wilson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Use of fluconazole as a surrogate marker to predict susceptibility and resistance to voriconazole among 13,338 clinical isolates of Candida spp. Tested by clinical and laboratory standards institute-recommended broth microdilution methods.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; S A Messer; L Boyken; C Rice; S Tendolkar; R J Hollis; D J Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Cross-resistance between fluconazole and ravuconazole and the use of fluconazole as a surrogate marker to predict susceptibility and resistance to ravuconazole among 12,796 clinical isolates of Candida spp.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; S A Messer; L Boyken; C Rice; S Tendolkar; R J Hollis; D J Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Selection of a surrogate agent (fluconazole or voriconazole) for initial susceptibility testing of posaconazole against Candida spp.: results from a global antifungal surveillance program.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; S A Messer; L Boyken; S Tendolkar; R J Hollis; D J Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Antimicrobial susceptibility breakpoints and first-step parC mutations in Streptococcus pneumoniae: redefining fluoroquinolone resistance.

Authors:  Sue Lim; Darrin Bast; Allison McGeer; Joyce de Azavedo; Donald E Low
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Increased fluoroquinolone resistance with time in Escherichia coli from >17,000 patients at a large county hospital as a function of culture site, age, sex, and location.

Authors:  Lauren Becnel Boyd; Robert L Atmar; Graham L Randall; Richard J Hamill; David Steffen; Lynn Zechiedrich
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.090

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.