Literature DB >> 32529683

Measuring intrarater association between correlated ordinal ratings.

Kerrie P Nelson1, Thomas J Zhou1, Don Edwards2.   

Abstract

Variability between raters' ordinal scores is commonly observed in imaging tests, leading to uncertainty in the diagnostic process. In breast cancer screening, a radiologist visually interprets mammograms and MRIs, while skin diseases, Alzheimer's disease, and psychiatric conditions are graded based on clinical judgment. Consequently, studies are often conducted in clinical settings to investigate whether a new training tool can improve the interpretive performance of raters. In such studies, a large group of experts each classify a set of patients' test results on two separate occasions, before and after some form of training with the goal of assessing the impact of training on experts' paired ratings. However, due to the correlated nature of the ordinal ratings, few statistical approaches are available to measure association between raters' paired scores. Existing measures are restricted to assessing association at just one time point for a single screening test. We propose here a novel paired kappa to provide a summary measure of association between many raters' paired ordinal assessments of patients' test results before versus after rater training. Intrarater association also provides valuable insight into the consistency of ratings when raters view a patient's test results on two occasions with no intervention undertaken between viewings. In contrast to existing correlated measures, the proposed kappa is a measure that provides an overall evaluation of the association among multiple raters' scores from two time points and is robust to the underlying disease prevalence. We implement our proposed approach in two recent breast-imaging studies and conduct extensive simulation studies to evaluate properties and performance of our summary measure of association.
© 2020 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  association; generalized linear mixed model; model-based kappa; ordinal classifications; screening test

Year:  2020        PMID: 32529683      PMCID: PMC7649720          DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201900177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biom J        ISSN: 0323-3847            Impact factor:   2.207


  31 in total

1.  2 x 2 kappa coefficients: measures of agreement or association.

Authors:  D A Bloch; H C Kraemer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Latent-variable models for longitudinal data with bivariate ordinal outcomes.

Authors:  David Todem; KyungMann Kim; Emmanuel Lesaffre
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Valencia King; Jennifer D Brooks; Jonine L Bernstein; Anne S Reiner; Malcolm C Pike; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Using replicate observations in observer agreement studies with binary assessments.

Authors:  S G Baker; L S Freedman; M K Parmar
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Asymptotic distributions of kappa statistics and their differences with many raters, many rating categories and two conditions.

Authors:  Luca Grassano; Guido Pagana; Marco Daperno; Enrico Bibbona; Mauro Gasparini
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.207

6.  Inter- and intrarater reliability of osteoarthritis classification at the trapeziometacarpal joint.

Authors:  R M Choa; H P Giele
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 7.  Predictors of interobserver agreement in breast imaging using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.

Authors:  Anna Liza M Antonio; Catherine M Crespi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.

Authors:  K Kerlikowske; D Grady; J Barclay; S D Frankel; S H Ominsky; E A Sickles; V Ernster
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-12-02       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Validity of the clinical dementia rating scale for the detection and staging of dementia in Brazilian patients.

Authors:  Márcia Lorena Fagundes Chaves; Ana Luiza Camozzato; Cláudia Godinho; Renata Kochhann; Artur Schuh; Vanessa Lopes de Almeida; Jeffrey Kaye
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.703

10.  A measure of association for ordered categorical data in population-based studies.

Authors:  Kerrie P Nelson; Don Edwards
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.021

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.