Literature DB >> 24951014

Reliability and validity of a new measurement of lumbar foraminal volume using a computed tomography.

Frédéric Khiami1, Sid-Ali Aziria, Stéphanie Ragot, Hugues Pascal-Moussellard, Jean-Pierre Richer, Michel Scepi, Cyril Brèque, Caroline Hirsch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Measuring foraminal stenosis is generally determined by an area calculation. It is difficult to know exactly where it is most appropriate to measure. No precise data are available on a method for calculating the foraminal volume using a CT. To develop a new method for measuring lumbar foraminal volume, we analyzed repeatability and reliability for measuring methods for foraminal volume using CT.
METHODS: The measurements were performed using a CT scan from ten healthy patients, with a mean age of 26.3 years. L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1 foramen were studied, to obtain 60 foraminal measurements. Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility was calculated. Each series was analyzed using the VitreaCore® reconstruction software for volume calculation.
RESULTS: Average volume measurements of 60 foramina and 20 L4-L5 foramina were, respectively, 1.17 and 1.25 mm(3) for observer 1 and 1.21 and 1.29 for observer 2. The intra-observer correlation coefficients for observer 1 when measuring all foramina and L4-L5 foramina were 0.98 and 0.99, respectively. For observer 2, coefficients were 0.90 and 0.92, respectively. The inter-observer correlation coefficients for observer 1 when measuring all foramina and L4-L5 foramina were 0.78 and 0.83, respectively. For observer 2, coefficients were 0.77 and 0.8, respectively. The average differences in intra- and inter-observer measurements regardless of the evaluator group were less than 0.2 mm(3).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study measuring lumbar foraminal volume using CT. The excellent reproducibility of this simple measure can supplement a range of foramen measurement tools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24951014     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-014-1324-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  17 in total

1.  Morphologic changes in the lumbar intervertebral foramen due to flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation: an in vitro anatomic and biomechanical study.

Authors:  A Fujiwara; H S An; T H Lim; V M Haughton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Spine update. Lumbar foraminal stenosis.

Authors:  L G Jenis; H S An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Observer variation in the evaluation of lumbar herniated discs and root compression: spiral CT compared with MRI.

Authors:  J C van Rijn; N Klemetso; J B Reitsma; P M Bossuyt; F J Hulsmans; W C Peul; G J den Heeten; J Stam; C B L M Majoie
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Intervertebral foramen size and volume changes in low grade, low dysplasia isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Spivak; Frederick J Kummer; Deyu Chen; Martin Quirno; Jonathan R Kamerlink
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Morphologic Changes in Contralateral Lumbar Foramen in Unilateral Cantilever Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Kidney-type Intervertebral Spacers.

Authors:  Takahiro Iwata; Kei Miyamoto; Akira Hioki; Kazunari Fushimi; Takatoshi Ohno; Katsuji Shimizu
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2015-06

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Lumbar vertebra morphometry and stereological assesment of intervertebral space volumetry: a methodological study.

Authors:  Hamit S Karabekir; Nuket Gocmen-Mas; Mete Edizer; Tolga Ertekin; Canan Yazici; Derya Atamturk
Journal:  Ann Anat       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  Prevalence of symptoms of cervical and lumbar stenosis among participants in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study.

Authors:  Molly T Vogt; Peggy Mannen Cawthon; James D Kang; William F Donaldson; Jane A Cauley; Michael C Nevitt
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Onset and recovery of hyperalgesia and hyperexcitability of sensory neurons following intervertebral foramen volume reduction and restoration.

Authors:  Xue-Jun Song; Dong-Sheng Xu; Carlos Vizcarra; Ronald L Rupert
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  Reliability of readings of magnetic resonance imaging features of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jon D Lurie; Anna N Tosteson; Tor D Tosteson; Eugene Carragee; John A Carrino; John Carrino; Jay Kaiser; Roberto T Blanco Sequeiros; Amy Rosen Lecomte; Margaret R Grove; Emily A Blood; Loretta H Pearson; James N Weinstein; Richard Herzog
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  1 in total

1.  Efficacy of computed tomography in prediction of operability of L5/S1 foraminal stenosis using region of interest: A STROBE-compliant retrospective study.

Authors:  Dong Woo Shim; Byung Ho Lee; Jiwoon Seo; Hyunjoo Hong; Sung Chul Shin; Hak Sun Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.