Literature DB >> 24949322

Inflammation-based score (Glasgow prognostic score) as an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer patients.

Kyeong Woon Choi1, Seong Woo Hong1, Yeo Goo Chang1, Woo Yong Lee1, Byungmo Lee1, In Wook Paik1, Hyucksang Lee1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate the systemic inflammatory response in colorectal cancer patients, and to estimate the usefulness of the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) as a prognostic factor.
METHODS: Patients with biopsy-proven colorectal adenocarcinoma who were operated between April 2005 and December 2008 were enrolled in this study. The GPS was estimated based on the measurement of CRP and serum albumin level. The GPS was compared with other clinicopathological factors. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the factors affecting cancer-specific survival.
RESULTS: GPS was significantly higher in patients with anemia, thrombocytosis, a high neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, tumor of the colon, and large tumor. Patient age, gender, serum CEA level, tumor gross appearance, TNM stage, and tumor differentiation were not related with the GPS. In univariate analysis, hemoglobin, CEA, gross appearance of tumor, TNM stage, tumor differentiation, and GPS were associated with cancer-specific survival. In multivariate analysis, TNM stage (III or IV : I or II; hazard ratio [HR], 12.322; P = 0.015), tumor differentiation (poorly differentiated : well or moderately differentiated; HR, 3.112; P = 0.021), and GPS (GPS 2 : GPS 0 or 1; HR, 5.168; P = 0.003) were identified as independent prognostic factors in colorectal cancer.
CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the GPS was an independent variable from tumor stage and a good and convenient prognostic factor in colorectal cancer patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal neoplasms; Inflammation; Prognosis

Year:  2014        PMID: 24949322      PMCID: PMC4062449          DOI: 10.4174/astr.2014.86.6.309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res        ISSN: 2288-6575            Impact factor:   1.859


INTRODUCTION

Malignant disease and inflammation have a close relationship with each other. Cancer can develop in several inflammatory conditions such as chronic hepatitis, chronic gastritis, inflammatory bowel diseases, and chronic pancreatitis [1]. Conversely, cancer can induce local or systemic inflammation, which is mediated by activation of transcription factors and production of major inflammatory cytokines [2]. Cancer-related inflammation can influence cell proliferation, cell survival, angiogenesis, tumor cell migration, invasion, metastasis, and inhibition of adaptive immunity [2]. Colorectal cancer (CRC) also has a close relationship with inflammation. Ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease, the most common inflammatory bowel diseases, are known as the premalignant conditions for CRC [3]. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were found to decrease the incidence of colorectal adenoma, and NSAIDs were also found to reduce the incidence of CRC [4]. Elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), which is a marker of systemic inflammation was reported as the risk factor for CRC [5]. Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), an inflammation-based prognostic score, which is assessed by simply using the serum CRP and albumin level, has been found to be a useful prognostic factor in several types of cancer [6]. Therefore, we hypothesized that systemic inflammation in CRC patients would be an important prognostic factor. This study was conducted to evaluate the systemic inflammatory response in CRC patients, and to estimate the usefulness of the GPS as a prognostic factor.

METHODS

Patients with biopsy-proven colorectal adenocarcinoma who were operated between April 2005 and December 2008 were enrolled in this study. Among these patients, data of serum CRP and albumin levels were available in 116 cases. Two cases of hospital mortality, 7 cases with TNM stage 0, one case of inaccurate staging, and one case of cancer perforation were excluded. None of the cases had other accompanying systemic inflammatory diseases. Finally, 105 patients were evaluated in this study. Patients' data recorded in our CRC database were analyzed. The following clinicopathological factors were selected and evaluated: age, gender, hemoglobin, thrombocytosis, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR, NLR was defined as the absolute neutrophil count divided by the absolute lymphocyte count), CEA, location of tumor (colon or rectum), tumor size, gross appearance of tumor, TNM stage (American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th ed.), and tumor differentiation. The GPS was estimated as described previously [7]. Briefly, patient with both an elevated level of CRP (>1.0 mg/dL) and hypoalbuminemia (<3.5 g/dL) were allocated a score of 2. Patients with only one of the above two abnormalities were allocated a score of 1. Patients with neither of the above two abnormalities were allocated a score of 0. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) was measured from the date of surgery to the date of death from CRC; the observations were censored at death from causes other than CRC. Categorical variables were analyzed by χ2 test. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the cumulative survival rate and to plot the survival curves. The long-rank test was used to compare the curves. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to confirm the independent relationship with survival. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

The patient's median age was 63 years (range, 32-86 years). The number of male and female patients are 63 and 42. The number of colon cancer cases was 70, and the number of rectal cancer cases was 35. Twelve cases were in the stage I, and 29, 40, and 24 cases were in the stages II, III, and IV, respectively. The mean follow-up was 44 months (range, 2-81 months). Median serum level of albumin was 3.8 g/dL, and the range was 2.5-4.6 g/dL. Median CRP level was 0.2 ng/dL (range, 0-14.6 ng/dL). The GPS was 0 in 69 cases (65.7%), 1 in 23 cases (21.9%) and 2 in 13 cases (12.4%) (Table 1).
Table 1

Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) of colorectal cancer patients based on the serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin

The relationship between the GPS and other clinicopathological characteristics was analyzed and is shown in Table 2. The GPS was significantly higher in patients with anemia, thrombocytosis, a high NLR, tumor of the colon, and a large tumor. Patient age, gender, serum CEA level, tumor gross appearance, TNM stage, and tumor differentiation were not related with the GPS.
Table 2

The relationship between Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) and other clinicopathological characteristics

CSS was evaluated according to the GPS. There was a significant difference in the survival rate according to the GPS (Fig. 1) (P < 0.001). But, the survival curve of the patients with a GPS of 0 was not different from that of the patients with a GPS of 1 (P = 0.6027). In univariate analysis of the other clinicopathological variables, hemoglobin, CEA, gross appearance of tumor, TNM stage, and tumor differentiation were associated with CSS. In multivariate analysis, TNM stage (III or IV : I or II; hazard ratio [HR] 12.322; P = 0.015), tumor differentiation (poorly differentiated : well or moderately differentiated; HR, 3.112; P = 0.021), and GPS (GPS 2 : GPS 0 or 1; HR, 5.168; P = 0.003) were identified as independent prognostic factors in CRC (Table 3).
Fig. 1

Cancer-specific survival curve according to the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS). There was a significant difference in the survival rate according to the GPS (P < 0.001). Survival curve of the patients with a GPS of 0 was not different from that of the patients with a GPS of 1 (P = 0.6027).

Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analyses for cancer-specific survival

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; GPS, Glasgow prognostic score.

DISCUSSION

Chronic inflammation affects all phases of carcinogenesis. Inflammation can induce the initial genetic mutation and epigenetic changes for cancer initiation. Inflammation can modify the tissue microenvironment that permits cancer cells to progress and metastasize. Inflammation can also suppress the immune response to tumor cells [1]. Conversely, cancer cells induce an inflammatory response which can be observed in the early phase of carcinogenesis. A recent experimental study showed that oncogenes could activate several inflammatory factors: colony stimulating factors (CSFs) which could recruit leukocytes and extend the survival; interleukin 1β, one of the main inflammatory cytokines; chemokines (CCL2, CCL20, IL-8) which activate monocyte recruitment and angiogenesis; chemokines and chemokine receptors (CXCL12, CXCR4) which activate tumor cell migration, proliferation, survival, and metastasis; proteases (matrix metalloproteinase [MMP]7, MMP9, MMP10, and urokinase-type plasminogen activator and its receptor) which are related with tumor cell invasion and dissemination [2,8]. Cancer producing proinflammatory cytokines induce the acute phase protein, which is a key marker of systemic inflammation. Systemic inflammation has been found to be positively associated with weight loss, hypermetabolism, anorexia, and poor prognosis in cancer patients [9]. In CRC, inflammation has an important role in the initiation and progression [3]. In colitis-associated colon cancer, chronic inflammation causes oxidative damage to DNA, leading to p53 mutations in tumor cells, and the inflamed epithelium and the inflammatory microenvironment at the tumor border can influence several key stages of invasion and metastasis [10]. McMillan et al. [11] reported that the prognostic score based on the serum CRP and albumin levels had an independent prognostic value after resection of CRC. Both CRP and albumin are acute phase proteins. Acute phase proteins are produced in the liver in response to inflammatory cytokines, mainly IL-6 and IL-1β. CRP level can be elevated to as much as 1,000-fold after an inflammatory stimulus [12]. But, the albumin level is decreased in response to inflammation. The albumin level is known to be decreased in cancer patients due to malnutrition and systemic inflammation [13]. Forrest et al. [7] designed the GPS, an inflammation-based prognostic score, which was assessed by simply using the serum CRP and serum albumin levels. The GPS has been proved to be an independent prognostic factor in many studies which have been performed in unselected cohorts, operable cancer patients, and chemo-radiotherapy and inoperable cancer patients [14]. In our study, we retrospectively evaluated the GPS of CRC patients without considering the TNM stages. A large number of patients were not enrolled in this study because we did not routinely check the CRP level in cancer patients until 2005. In comparison with the other clinicopathological factors, the GPS was significantly higher in patients with anemia, thrombocytosis, a high NLR, tumor of the colon, and large tumor. Anemia and thrombocytosis are considered to be the common manifestations induced by inflammatory cytokines in cancer patients [12]. NLR is another well-known indicator of systemic inflammatory response and a prognostic factor in CRC patients [15]. In comparison with rectal cancer, colon cancer and larger tumors had a close relationship with a high GPS in this study. In another study also, colon cancer was associated with a higher GPS [11]. CRP level was reported to be higher in patients with colon cancer and larger tumors [16]. In our study, patient age, gender, serum CEA level, tumor gross appearance, TNM stage, and tumor differentiation were not related with the GPS. TNM stage and serum CEA level are very good indicators of tumor progression. This finding indicates that the GPS may not be a dependent variable reflecting tumor progression. McMillan et al. [11] showed that the GPS was not related with Dukes' stage of the tumor. But, other authors reported that the GPS was positively correlated with advanced TNM stage and high level of CEA [17]. Many studies confirmed that the GPS was a good indicator of prognosis in several kinds of cancers including lung cancer [7], CRC [11], gastric cancer [18], and hepatocellular carcinoma [19]. In this study of CRC patients, patients with a GPS of 0 and a GPS of 1 had a similar prognosis, but patients with a GPS of 2 had worse prognosis compared with that in patients with a GPS of 0 or 1 in the multivariate analysis. The GPS was proved to be a valuable independent prognostic factor in this study. Our results suggest that anti-inflammatory agents with other therapeutic modalities may prolong the survival of CRC patients [20]. In conclusion, our study showed that the GPS was an independent variable from tumor stage and a good and convenient prognostic factor in CRC patients.
  20 in total

1.  Albumin concentrations are primarily determined by the body cell mass and the systemic inflammatory response in cancer patients with weight loss.

Authors:  D C McMillan; W S Watson; P O'Gorman; T Preston; H R Scott; C S McArdle
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.900

2.  Is C-reactive protein a prognostic factor of colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Yu-Chen Shiu; Jen-Kou Lin; Chi-Jung Huang; Jeng-Kai Jiang; Ling-Wei Wang; Huei-Chen Huang; Shung-Haur Yang
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 3.  The systemic inflammation-based Glasgow Prognostic Score: a decade of experience in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Donald C McMillan
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 12.111

4.  Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) in patients undergoing resection for colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Donald C McMillan; Joseph E M Crozier; Khalid Canna; Wilson J Angerson; Colin S McArdle
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Inflammation and colon cancer.

Authors:  Janos Terzić; Sergei Grivennikov; Eliad Karin; Michael Karin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  Systemic inflammation, cachexia and prognosis in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Christopher Deans; Stephen J Wigmore
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 7.  Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors for primary prevention of colorectal cancer: a systematic review prepared for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Alaa Rostom; Catherine Dubé; Gabriela Lewin; Alexander Tsertsvadze; Nicholas Barrowman; Catherine Code; Margaret Sampson; David Moher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Inflammation-based prognostic score as a predictor of postoperative gastric cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Mohri; Koji Tanaka; Masaki Ohi; Yuji Toiyama; Hiromi Yasuda; Yasuhiro Inoue; Keiichi Uchida; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.480

9.  A prospective study of serum C-reactive protein and colorectal cancer risk in men.

Authors:  Marc J Gunter; Rachael Stolzenberg-Solomon; Amanda J Cross; Michael F Leitzmann; Stephanie Weinstein; Richard J Wood; Jarmo Virtamo; Philip R Taylor; Demetrius Albanes; Rashmi Sinha
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Use of aspirin postdiagnosis improves survival for colon cancer patients.

Authors:  E Bastiaannet; K Sampieri; O M Dekkers; A J M de Craen; M P P van Herk-Sukel; V Lemmens; C B M van den Broek; J W Coebergh; R M C Herings; C J H van de Velde; R Fodde; G J Liefers
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  28 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy of rectal carcinoma : Baseline hematologic parameters influencing outcomes.

Authors:  Miroslav Hodek; Igor Sirák; Alexander Ferko; Július Örhalmi; Eva Hovorková; Dimitar Hadži Nikolov; Petr Paluska; Jindřich Kopecký; Jiří Petera; Milan Vošmik
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Preoperative lymphocyte-monocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratios as predictors of overall survival in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Gui-Ming Zhang; Yao Zhu; Lei Luo; Fang-Ning Wan; Yi-Ping Zhu; Li-Jiang Sun; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-06-02

3.  A new dimensional-reducing variable obtained from original inflammatory scores is highly associated to morbidity after curative surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Martin Bailon-Cuadrado; Baltasar Perez-Saborido; Javier Sanchez-Gonzalez; Mario Rodriguez-Lopez; Agustin Mayo-Iscar; David Pacheco-Sanchez
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Evaluation of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients undergoing hepatobiliary resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Masataka Okuno; Tomoki Ebata; Yukihiro Yokoyama; Tsuyoshi Igami; Gen Sugawara; Takashi Mizuno; Junpei Yamaguchi; Masato Nagino
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  Clinical Significance of the Glasgow Prognostic Score for Survival after Colorectal Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Tunc Eren; Busra Burcu; Ercument Tombalak; Tugrul Ozdemir; Metin Leblebici; Ibrahim Ali Ozemir; Sedat Ziyade; Orhan Alimoglu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  The Prognostic Value of Preoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Hidemasa Kubo; Yasutoshi Murayama; Tomohiro Arita; Yoshiaki Kuriu; Masayoshi Nakanishi; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  The Charlson Comorbidity Index as an Independent Prognostic Factor in Older Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Tetsuro Tominaga; Takashi Nonaka; Hiroaki Takeshita; Masaki Kunizaki; Yorihisa Sumida; Shigekazu Hidaka; Terumitsu Sawai; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 0.656

8.  Cetuximab versus bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: a comparative effectiveness study.

Authors:  Rui Pedro Marques; Ana Rita Godinho; Peter Heudtlass; Helena Luna Pais; António Quintela; Ana Paula Martins
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Systemic and local inflammation in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Roberts Rumba; Sandra Cipkina; Fanija Cukure; Andrejs Vanags
Journal:  Acta Med Litu       Date:  2018

10.  The relationship between Glasgow Prognostic Score and serum tumor markers in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ai-Gui Jiang; Hong-Lin Chen; Hui-Yu Lu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.